Parameter distribution characteristics of material fatigue life using improved bootstrap method
Source abstract
Abstract
The bootstrap method is mostly used to estimate statistical characteristics of small sample data. However, the limitations of the bootstrap method itself lead to a reduction in the reliability of small-sample estimates. In this article, an improved bootstrap method is developed to address this problem. In the statistically significant error range (the sample average error and the limit error of sampling) of the original single sample data, expanding the virtual test data that obey two distributions to overcome the limitations of the bootstrap method itself. This article compares and analyses these two methods through the case; the result indicates that the improved bootstrap method can enhance the reliability of the estimation results without changing its probability distribution. We also discussed how to reduce the fluctuation of the improved bootstrap method. And the effectiveness and feasibility of this improved method are discussed in the analysis of fatigue life test data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Bai H · 2007
2. Beran R · 1992
3. Bhachu KS, Haftka RT and Kim NH (2015) Using bootstrap to assess sampling uncertainty in fatigue crack growth life. In: 17th AIAA non-deterministic approaches conference . Kissimmee, Florida: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.10.2514/6.2015-0662 ↗
4. 10.1177/1748006X1668689510.1177/1748006X16686895 ↗
5. 10.1006/jmva.2000.190310.1006/jmva.2000.1903 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0015675210.1007/BF00156752 ↗
7. 10.1093/biomet/73.3.55510.1093/biomet/73.3.555 ↗
8. 10.1214/aos/117634455210.1214/aos/1176344552 ↗
9. Efron B · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1997 · 92 · 548
10. 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-910.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 ↗
11. Fang J · Journal of Psychological Science · 2013 · 36 · 722
12. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1937.tb02154.x10.1111/j.1469-1809.1937.tb02154.x ↗
13. Haibach E (2003) Analytical Strength Assessment of Components in Mechanical Engineering (5th edition). Frank-furt: FKM Guideline.
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.02610.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.026 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01781.x10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01781.x ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00533.x10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00533.x ↗
17. 10.1214/aos/117634865210.1214/aos/1176348652 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ymben.2006.04.00310.1016/j.ymben.2006.04.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00028-010.1016/S0167-4730(02)00028-0 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmva.2015.05.00110.1016/j.jmva.2015.05.001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jkss.2011.08.00910.1016/j.jkss.2011.08.009 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3803-210.1007/978-1-4757-3803-2 ↗
23. 10.1186/1745-7580-2-210.1186/1745-7580-2-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.08.00210.1016/j.jeconom.2009.08.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.036 ↗
26. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_410.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.03.00710.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.03.007 ↗
28. 10.1080/0027317080203484410.1080/00273170802034844 ↗
29. 10.1080/10635150075004976110.1080/106351500750049761 ↗
30. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-610.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6 ↗
31. 10.1177/105678951561644810.1177/1056789515616448 ↗
32. 10.1198/000313004284510.1198/0003130042845 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)84334-810.1016/S0003-2670(01)84334-8 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)89054-610.1016/S0003-2670(00)89054-6 ↗
35. Veritas DN. (2011) Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures , (DNV-RP-C203) 176.
36. 10.1016/j.ress.2016.12.00610.1016/j.ress.2016.12.006 ↗
37. 10.1002/qre.208910.1002/qre.2089 ↗
38. 10.1177/105678951771911710.1177/1056789517719117 ↗
39. 10.1520/JTE2016029610.1520/JTE20160296 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cja.2013.07.02310.1016/j.cja.2013.07.023 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.007 ↗
42. 10.1177/105678951665567110.1177/1056789516655671 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.02.02310.1016/j.actaastro.2012.02.023 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.01310.1016/j.ress.2015.12.013 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.03110.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.031 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.00410.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.004 ↗
47. 10.5351/CSAM.2017.24.1.00110.5351/CSAM.2017.24.1.001 ↗
48. Yu X · ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition · 2016 · 14 · V014T14A007
49. Zar JH · 2007
50. 10.1007/s11431-013-5385-010.1007/s11431-013-5385-0 ↗
51. 10.1177/105678951668883510.1177/1056789516688835 ↗
52. 10.1177/105678951039707710.1177/1056789510397077 ↗