The development of continuum damage mechanics-based theories for predicting forming limit diagrams for hot stamping applications
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a novel plane-stress continuum damage mechanics (CDM) model for the prediction of the different shapes of forming limit diagrams (FLCs) for aluminium alloys under hot stamping conditions. Firstly, a set of uniaxial viscoplastic damage constitutive equations is determined from tensile experimental data of AA5754 at a temperature range of 350–550℃ and strain rates of 0.1, 1.0 and 10 s −1 . The tests were carried out on Gleeble materials simulator (3800). Based on the analysis of features of FLCs for different materials forming at different temperatures, a plane-stress damage equation is proposed to take account the failure of materials at different stress-state sheet metal forming conditions. In this way, a set of multiaxial viscoplastic damage constitutive equations is formulated. The model is calibrated from the FLC data at temperature of 350℃ and strain rate of 1.0 s −1 for AA5754. A good agreement has been achieved between the experimental and numerical data. The effect of the maximum principal stress, effective stress and hydrostatic stress on the materials failure features and on the shape of FLCs is studied individually and in combination. Using the newly developed plane-stress unified viscoplastic damage constitutive equations, the FLC of materials can be predicted at different temperatures and strain rate forming conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, UK
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Ali WJ, Balod AO (2007) Theoretical determination of forming limit diagram for steel, brass and aluminium alloy sheets. Al-Rafidain Engineering 15(1): 40–55.
2. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.07.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.07.003 ↗
3. 10.1002/nme.211210.1002/nme.2112 ↗
4. 10.1177/105678950809754810.1177/1056789508097548 ↗
5. 10.1177/105678950606493810.1177/1056789506064938 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.03010.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.030 ↗
7. Fatmaoui H, Mesrar R, Chaoufi J (2008) Intrinsic diagram of sheet metal forming limits for arbitrary strain paths. Journal of Materials: Design and Applications 222(4): 223–229.
8. 10.1177/105678950934307710.1177/1056789509343077 ↗
9. 10.1243/03093247JSA23010.1243/03093247JSA230 ↗
10. Garrett PR Lin J and Dean TA (2005) An investigation of the effects of solution heat treatment on mechanical properties for AA 6xxx alloys: Experimentation and modelling. International Journal of Plasticity 21(8): 1640–1657.10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.11.002 ↗
11. Goodwin GM (1968) Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming problems in the press shop. Metallurgia Italiana 60: 764–774.
12. 10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00838-010.1016/S0924-0136(03)00838-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/0022-5096(72)90015-410.1016/0022-5096(72)90015-4 ↗
15. 10.1177/105678951039633110.1177/1056789510396331 ↗
16. Johnson W and Duncan JL (1963) A rapid method of determining stress–strain curves for sheet metal using the bulge test. In: Proceedings of the fourth international MTDR conference Manchester Pergamon Press Oxford p.257.
17. Keeler SP (1965) Determination of forming limits in automotive stampings. Sheet Metal Industries 42: 683–691.
18. 10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00036-X10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00036-X ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.00610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.006 ↗
20. Kröhn MA, Leen SB, Hyde TH (2007) A superplastic forming limit diagram concept for Ti-6Al-4V. Journal of Materials: Design and Applications 221(4): 251–264.
21. 10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00045-010.1016/S0020-7403(02)00045-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00021-810.1016/S0020-7403(02)00021-8 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.07.00310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.07.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00311-410.1016/S0924-0136(02)00311-4 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.02610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.026 ↗
26. 10.1016/0020-7403(93)90065-310.1016/0020-7403(93)90065-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.02.01010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.02.010 ↗
28. 10.1177/105678950505035710.1177/1056789505050357 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00031-510.1016/S0749-6419(99)00031-5 ↗
30. Marciniak Z Kuczynski K and Pokora T (1973) Influence of the plastic properties of a material on the forming limit diagram for sheet metal in tension. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 15: 789–805.10.1016/0020-7403(73)90068-4 ↗
31. McClintock and Frank A (1996) Mechanical behaviour of materials. Reading MA Addison Wesley pub.Co.
32. Mohamed M, Foster AD, Lin J (2008) Solution heat treatment in HFQ process. Steel Research International 79(11): 160–167.
33. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.07.00510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.07.005 ↗
34. Nakazima K Kikuma T and Asaku K (1968) Study on the formability of steel sheet. Yawata Technical Report 264.
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.00910.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.009 ↗
36. 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02344-810.1016/0924-0136(96)02344-8 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00122-310.1016/S0924-0136(99)00122-3 ↗
38. Takuda H, Mori K (2000) Prediction finite element analysis of limit strains in biaxial stretching of sheet metals allowing for ductile fracture. International Journal Machine Tools and Manufacture 42: 785–798.
39. 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00442-710.1016/S0924-0136(98)00442-7 ↗
40. 10.1080/1042691080197480410.1080/10426910801974804 ↗
41. Wesley AS Joshua JJ Timothy AM et al. (2010) Effect of electrical pulsing on various heat treatments of 5xxx series aluminum alloys. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 world conference on innovative virtual reality WINVR2010 Ames IA USA.
42. 10.1243/03093247V31318710.1243/03093247V313187 ↗