Influence of aggregate and interface properties on the impact response and scaling effect of RC beams: A mesoscale study
Source abstract
Abstract
As a multiphase composite material, concrete exhibits complex mechanical responses under dynamic loads due to the heterogeneity of its internal mesoscopic components. Prototype tests are the most reliable methodologies to explore structural performance under dynamic loads, but they are limited by equipment, technology, and cost. Therefore, researchers typically adopt scaled tests to analyze the structural impact response. However, the dynamic response of the structure may not satisfy the classical similarity law and the reasons are under investigation. In this study, the relationship between concrete heterogeneity and scaling effect was explored preliminarily. Based on the drop hammer impact simulations, the mesoscale numerical models of four reinforced concrete (RC) beams (scale factors λ = 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, and 1) were established after considering the heterogeneity of concrete. The effects of aggregate content, aggregate elastic modulus, and interfacial transition zone (ITZ) strength on the impact response and their scaling effects were investigated. Finally, the Gaussian function was applied to describe concrete heterogeneity and analyze its relationship with the scaling effect. The results indicate that aggregate elastic modulus and ITZ strength have a minor effect on the impact response. However, increased aggregate content enhances the midspan displacement and displacement scaling effect in geometrically similar RC beams. The more substantial the concrete heterogeneity in the spatial distribution, the stronger the peak displacement scaling effect on geometrically similar RC beams.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing University of Technology
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.04.07010.1016/j.istruc.2023.04.070 ↗
2. Bažant ZP, Planas J (1998) Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials. New York: Routledge.
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:8(1686)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:8(1686) ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0247201610.1007/BF02472016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11837510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118375 ↗
6. Dilger WH, Koch R, Kowalczyk R (1984) Ductility of plain and confined concrete under different strain rates. Journal Proceedings 81(1): 73–81.
7. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.005 ↗
8. Elfahal MM, Krauthammer T (2005) Dynamic size effect in normal-and high-strength concrete cylinders. ACI Materials Journal 102(2): 77–85.
9. Fang Q, Huan Y, Zhang YD, et al. (2007) Investigation into static properties of damaged plasticity model for concrete in ABAQUS. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology 8(3): 254–260. in Chinese.
10. 10.1061/TACEAT.000197910.1061/TACEAT.0001979 ↗
11. GB 50010-2010 code for design of concrete structures (2015) Beijing: Standards Press of China.
12. 10.1260/2041-4196.2.2.17710.1260/2041-4196.2.2.177 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.06.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.06.009 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.10.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.10.011 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10152610.1016/j.jobe.2020.101526 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.002 ↗
18. 10.1111/jace.1259110.1111/jace.12591 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.10374310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103743 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.10473110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104731 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.10488710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.104887 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.11.01910.1016/j.cemconres.2003.11.019 ↗
24. Liu F, Luo QZ, Jiang ZG (2015) Dynamic responses and failure mechanism of RC beams to low velocity impact. Engineering Mechanics 32(5): 155–161. in Chinese.
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12808110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128081 ↗
26. Liu YH, Ci WZ, Zhao YC, et al. (2023) Size effects of deflection of concrete-filled circular steel tubular members under lateral impact. Journal of Vibation and Shock 42(3): 103–111. in Chinese.
27. 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-410.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10185010.1016/j.jobe.2020.101850 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.09.00510.1016/j.compstruc.2016.09.005 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11963910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119639 ↗
31. Malvar LJ (1998) Review of static and dynamic properties of steel reinforcing bars. Materials Journal 95(5): 609–616.
32. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.10336410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103364 ↗
33. Mazzariol LM, Alves M (2019b) Similarity laws of structures under impact load: Geometric and material distortion. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 157: 633–647.
34. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10388910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103889 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.06.01110.1016/j.istruc.2019.06.011 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.006 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.02110.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.021 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10686310.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106863 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10845010.1016/j.jobe.2024.108450 ↗
40. 10.1177/10567895920010040410.1177/105678959200100404 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.10463010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104630 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.01610.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.016 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.10.01110.1016/j.tafmec.2017.10.011 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.01210.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.012 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.01510.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.015 ↗
46. 10.1177/1056789522112309210.1177/10567895221123092 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.04010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.040 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.09410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.094 ↗
49. 10.1177/1056789523116081110.1177/10567895231160811 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11534610.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115346 ↗
51. 10.1177/1056789524127478010.1177/10567895241274780 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10393310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103933 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10664610.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106646 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.08.04510.1016/j.corsci.2011.08.045 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.06.02110.1016/j.corsci.2016.06.021 ↗
56. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000311510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003115 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.04.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.04.002 ↗