journal article·2024-09

Strain energy density and entire fracture surface parameters relationship for LCF life prediction of additively manufactured 18Ni300 steel

Wojciech Macek, Ricardo Branco, Joel de Jesus, José Domingos Costa, Shun-Peng Zhu, Reza Masoudi Nejad, Andrew Gryguć

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the connection between total strain energy density and fracture surface topography is investigated in additively manufactured maraging steel exposed to low-cycle fatigue loading. The specimens were fabricated using laser beam powder bed fusion (LB-PBF) and examined under fully-reversed strain-controlled setup at strain amplitudes scale from 0.3% to 1.0%. The post-mortem fracture surfaces were explored using a non-contact 3D surface topography measuring system and the entire fracture surface method. The focus is on the relationship between fatigue characteristics, expressed by the total strain energy density, and the fracture surface topography features, represented by areal, volume, and fractal dimension factors. A fatigue life prediction model based on total strain energy density and fracture surface topography parameters is proposed. The presented model shows good accordance with fatigue test results and outperforms other existing models based on the strain energy density. This model can be useful for post-failure analysis of engineering elements under low-cycle fatigue, especially for materials produced by additive manufacturing (AM).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland

CEMMPRE, ARISE, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, P. R. China

Institute of Electronic and Information Engineering of UESTC in Guangdong, Dongguan, China

Faculty of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China

Department of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/105678952199162010.1177/1056789521991620 ↗
2. 10.1177/105678951774153110.1177/1056789517741531 ↗
3. Avanzini A · Materials 2023 · 2022 · 16 · 16
4. 10.1209/0295-5075/13/1/01310.1209/0295-5075/13/1/013 ↗
5. 10.3390/met801003210.3390/met8010032 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10640510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106405 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10946910.1016/j.matdes.2021.109469 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10713410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107134 ↗
9. 10.1177/10567895000090020410.1177/105678950000900204 ↗
10. Dan L · 2018 · 8 · 623
11. 10.1111/ffe.1356510.1111/ffe.13565 ↗
12. 10.1115/1.326556510.1115/1.3265565 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-94-009-2277-8_4210.1007/978-94-009-2277-8_42 ↗
14. Halford G · Journal of Materials · 1966 · 1 · 3
15. International Organisation of Standardization (2010) ISO 25178 . Geometric Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface texture: areal.
16. ISO - ISO 25178-2:2012 (2020) - Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: Areal—Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters (n.d.). Available at: www.iso.org/standard/42785.html (accessed 28 December 2023).
17. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10276310.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102763 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00102-X10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00102-X ↗
19. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00016-010.1016/S0142-1123(01)00016-0 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11661-998-0358-910.1007/s11661-998-0358-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.04.03810.1016/j.matchar.2019.04.038 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.34310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.343 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.00710.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.007 ↗
24. 10.1515/meceng-2015-000610.1515/meceng-2015-0006 ↗
25. Macek W · Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering · 2017 · 21 · 935
26. 10.1111/ffe.1267710.1111/ffe.12677 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.10397210.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103972 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10635410.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106354 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10612110.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106121 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10918210.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109182 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10738410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107384 ↗
32. 10.1038/308721a010.1038/308721a0 ↗
33. 10.1007/978-3-319-58205-410.1007/978-3-319-58205-4 ↗
34. 10.1016/0025-5416(81)90089-610.1016/0025-5416(81)90089-6 ↗
35. Mroziński S · Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics · 2007 · 45 · 773
36. 10.1115/1.364178010.1115/1.3641780 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.01310.1016/j.addma.2018.11.013 ↗
38. 10.3390/ma1415407710.3390/ma14154077 ↗
39. 10.3390/ma1605186510.3390/ma16051865 ↗
40. Ramberg W, Osgood WR (1943) Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters. Technical Note No. 902, National Advisory Committee For Aeronautics, Washington DC.
41. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.03010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.030 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10691310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106913 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.04.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.04.011 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2017.06.00110.1016/j.cirpj.2017.06.001 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.002 ↗
46. 10.1177/105678951142983610.1177/1056789511429836 ↗
47. 10.1177/105678951143278910.1177/1056789511432789 ↗