journal article·2023-02

Combined high and low cycle fatigue life prediction model based on damage curve method considering loading interaction effect

Jun Hou, Xiaowei Wang, Hui Guo, Yansong Wang, Fangjie Li, Qin Shen

Publisher page

Abstract

Through analyzing the characteristics of the Miner’s rule and the Manson-Halford (M-H) model, a nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation model is established based on the damage curve method under combined high and low cycle fatigue loading. In this model, an interaction factor related to the maximum stress and high cycle stress range is proposed to consider the loading interaction effect. Furthermore, the proposed model does not require any additional material parameters except for the S-N curve parameters. The experimental data of five materials, including TC11 alloy, 2024-T3 aluminum alloy, 45 steel, LY12-CZ aluminum alloy, and GH4033 Ni-based alloy, are introduced to verify the proposed model. Compared with the Miner’s rule and the M-H model, most of the prediction results by the proposed model are within the life factor range of 2, implying the established model has higher prediction accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, PR China

School of Materials Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, PR China

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.01710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.017 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.01010.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.02510.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.025 ↗
4. 10.1111/ffe.1372210.1111/ffe.13722 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2009.00666.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2009.00666.x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10639310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106393 ↗
7. 10.3390/met1102020410.3390/met11020204 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.02710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.027 ↗
9. 10.1177/1056789521104542010.1177/10567895211045420 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10312310.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103123 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01577.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01577.x ↗
12. 10.1111/ffe.1352610.1111/ffe.13526 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10314310.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103143 ↗
14. 10.1177/105678951244963810.1177/1056789512449638 ↗
15. Li R · Aircraft Design · 2010 · 30 · 18
16. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10715410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107154 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10578910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105789 ↗
18. 10.1177/105678951770153110.1177/1056789517701531 ↗
19. 10.1111/ffe.1359210.1111/ffe.13592 ↗
20. 10.1177/105678951882439610.1177/1056789518824396 ↗
21. 10.1177/105678951452407510.1177/1056789514524075 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.005 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0005351910.1007/BF00053519 ↗
24. 10.1115/1.400945810.1115/1.4009458 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10613810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106138 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.02310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.023 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.01910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.019 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.03910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.039 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.06.01110.1016/j.tafmec.2018.06.011 ↗
30. 10.1177/1056789521104604310.1177/10567895211046043 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.02210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.022 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma1412339510.3390/ma14123395 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.09.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.09.010 ↗
34. 10.1177/1056789521104512010.1177/10567895211045120 ↗
35. Wang S, Shao J (1998) Contrast between low cycle fatigue and high-low cycle complex fatigue behavior of metal materials. In: International conference on mechanical testing of materials and structures , China, Hong Kong, October (1998) pp. 101–104. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
36. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10634610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106346 ↗
37. Yan XJ · Journal of Aerospace Power · 2011 · 26 · 1824
38. 10.1111/ffe.1324610.1111/ffe.13246 ↗
39. 10.1177/105678952098685410.1177/1056789520986854 ↗
40. Zhang Y · International Journal of Aerospace Engineering · 2018 · 2018 · 7154784
41. 10.1016/j.cja.2020.10.02110.1016/j.cja.2020.10.021 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.10.03710.1016/j.msea.2012.10.037 ↗
43. 10.1177/105678951986774710.1177/1056789519867747 ↗
44. 10.1177/1056789522108802910.1177/10567895221088029 ↗