journal article·2021-04

Influence of biochar from animal and plant origin on the compressive strength characteristics of degraded landfill surface soils

Manash Jyoti Bora, Sanandam Bordoloi, Himanshu Kumar, Nirmali Gogoi, Hong-Hu Zhu, Ajit K Sarmah, P Sreeja, S Sreedeep, Guoxiong Mei

Publisher page

Abstract

Growing awareness of sustainability in the landfill cover system has increased the use of biochar amendment for degraded landfill surface soils. Hydraulic and vegetative benefits of biochar on cover soil have been studied in the past, while ignoring mechanical characteristics, which is important to understand progressive failure of landfill infrastructure. In this study, the mechanical characteristics of four soil–biochar composites were investigated by conducting 81 unconfined compressive strength test. The results based on four in-house produced biochar were used to study the effect of compaction state (density, moisture content) and biochar percentage (5% and 10%) on unconfined compressive strength of soil–biochar. The ductility of soil–biochar was investigated for all the four biochars. Results from this study indicate a contrasting observation of strength gain depending on the type of biochar. The unconfined compressive strength of soil–biochar is potentially influenced by the different surface functional groups of biochar (hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity) and soil-biochar interlocking. It was noted that the peanut shell biochar gave comparable unconfined compressive strength of soil–biochar with that of bare soil for different compaction state. However, a diminution in the unconfined compressive strength was observed for all the other three soil–biochar sourced from water hyacinth, saw dust, and poultry litter. The study indicates that the use of biochar in soils does not ensure an improvement in the strength of soil–biochar. Enhancement in ductility was found for all the four soil–biochar irrespective of compaction state. Improvement in ductility was maximum when the soil–biochar is compacted at the dry state of optimum. Plant-based biochar has higher potency to increase the ductility of soil as compared to the animal-based biochar. Our study identifies peanut shell biochar ideal for landfill cover amendment material, considering its mechanical characteristics and design criterion. Soil biochar composite from water hyacinth, saw dust, and poultry litter can be used for potential application in green-infrastructure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies · Soil and Unsaturated Flow

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, India

Department of Environmental Science, Tezpur University, Tezpur, India

School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, China

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00032-110.1016/S0013-7952(01)00032-1 ↗
2. ASTM D1557 (2015) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lb/ft 3 (2,700 kN-m/m 3 )). Annual Book of Standards 4.
3. ASTM D1762-84 (2013) Standard Test Method for Chemical Analysis of Wood Charcoal, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, www.astm.org. DOI: 10.1520/D1762-84R1310.1520/D1762-84R13 ↗
4. ASTM D2487-11 (2011) Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, www.astm.org. DOI: 10.1520/D2487-1110.1520/D2487-11 ↗
5. ASTM D422-63 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, p. 1520.
6. ASTM D4318-10 (2010) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. DOI:10.1520/D4318-1010.1520/D4318-10 ↗
7. ASTM D854-14 (2014) Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer.
8. 10.1680/jgele.17.0018110.1680/jgele.17.00181 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.01110.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.011 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.04410.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.044 ↗
11. 10.1097/SS.0b013e3182357ca910.1097/SS.0b013e3182357ca9 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.01.00210.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.01.002 ↗
13. 10.1177/105678951774133910.1177/1056789517741339 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12205-010-0281-710.1007/s12205-010-0281-7 ↗
15. 10.1071/SR0710910.1071/SR07109 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.06110.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.061 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.00210.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.002 ↗
18. Deka S · Geotechnical Testing Journal · 2009 · 32 · 55310.1520/GTJ102205 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.07.06910.1016/j.jcis.2017.07.069 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.00510.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.005 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11600-019-00387-y10.1007/s11600-019-00387-y ↗
22. 10.1038/ngeo39510.1038/ngeo395 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11600-018-0237-810.1007/s11600-018-0237-8 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.12.01010.1016/j.biombioe.2013.12.010 ↗
25. 10.1177/105678951882305010.1177/1056789518823050 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11270-013-1820-x10.1007/s11270-013-1820-x ↗
27. 10.1177/105678951880262510.1177/1056789518802625 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000086110.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000861 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.03310.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.033 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11368-020-02573-810.1007/s11368-020-02573-8 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.41710.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.417 ↗
32. Lehmann J · Earthscan · 2009 · 25 · 15801
33. 10.1177/105678951772080410.1177/1056789517720804 ↗
34. 10.3390/su1207259910.3390/su12072599 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.00710.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.007 ↗
36. 10.1021/es301029g10.1021/es301029g ↗
37. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.01710.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.017 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13648610.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136486 ↗
39. 10.1680/jgele.17.0018010.1680/jgele.17.00180 ↗
40. 10.1680/jgeot.17.P.04010.1680/jgeot.17.P.040 ↗
41. 10.1177/0734242X1558019210.1177/0734242X15580192 ↗
42. 10.1023/A:101857021354610.1023/A:1018570213546 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.02510.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.025 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.03210.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.032 ↗
45. Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR (2015c) Shear strength of waste-wood biochar and biochar-amended soil used for sustainable landfill cover systems. In: From Fundamentals to App Geotech , IOS Press Amsterdam. pp. 745–752.
46. 10.1520/GTJ11118J10.1520/GTJ11118J ↗
47. 10.1002/tqem.2152810.1002/tqem.21528 ↗
48. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1989) Final covers on hazardous waste landfills and surface impoundments . Technical Guidance Document.
49. 10.1002/jsfa.613010.1002/jsfa.6130 ↗
50. Wang H, Garg A, Huang S, et al. (2020) Mechanism of compacted biochar-amended expansive clay subjected to drying–wetting cycles: Simultaneous investigation of hydraulic and mechanical properties. Acta Geophysica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-020-00423-210.1007/s11600-020-00423-2 ↗
51. 10.1007/s11368-009-0111-z10.1007/s11368-009-0111-z ↗
52. 10.1038/ncomms105310.1038/ncomms1053 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.03410.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.034 ↗
54. 10.1007/s11356-012-0873-510.1007/s11356-012-0873-5 ↗
55. 10.1002/jpln.20130059610.1002/jpln.201300596 ↗
56. 10.1007/s11368-015-1187-210.1007/s11368-015-1187-2 ↗