Assessment of the fracture process zone in rocks using digital image correlation technique: The role of mode-mixity, size, geometry and material
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental research on the length and shape of the fracture process zone of rocks under mode I, mixed mode (I + II) and mode II loading conditions for different geometries of cracked specimens made of two types of rocks, using the digital image correlation approach. Single edge notch bending (SENB) and semi-circular bend specimens are the two geometries considered. In order to investigate the effect of the specimen size on the fracture process zone length, rocks with three different sizes are produced and tested. To investigate the effect of the mode mixity on the fracture process zone length of marble and sandstone, the specimens are tested under different modes of loading. According to the experimental results, it is found that the fracture process zone length changes with mode ratio, specimen size, geometry and the material properties. The fracture process zone length increases when the mode of loading moves from mode I to mode II. Experimental results also show that fracture process zone becomes longer for specimens with larger sizes. The fracture process zone is also affected by the specimen geometry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fatigue and Fracture Research Laboratory, Center of Excellence in Experimental Solid Mechanics and Dynamics, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
INEGI, Porto, Portugal
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.10.00610.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.10.006 ↗
2. 10.1201/978131537029310.1201/9781315370293 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.10.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.10.011 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.10.00110.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.10.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.00510.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.09.01110.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.09.011 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05233.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05233.x ↗
8. Bazant ZP · 1997
9. Brooks Z · 2013
10. 10.1007/s11340-006-9001-010.1007/s11340-006-9001-0 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.12.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.12.003 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.03110.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.031 ↗
13. 10.1016/0013-7944(93)90155-L10.1016/0013-7944(93)90155-L ↗
14. 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0124016010.1007/BF01240160 ↗
16. 10.1177/105678951350431910.1177/1056789513504319 ↗
17. Kozicki J · Archives of Hydro-Engineering and Environmental Mechanics · 2007 · 54 · 3
18. 10.1016/0148-9062(87)90178-110.1016/0148-9062(87)90178-1 ↗
19. Li F-F, Fang G and Qian L-Y (2019) Forming limit analysis of Mg-2Zn-1.2Al-0.2Ca-0.2RE alloy sheet using ductile fracture models. International Journal of Damage Mechanics . DOI: 10.1177/1056789519855763.10.1177/1056789519855763 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.018 ↗
21. Lin Q · Journal of Acoustic Emission · 2011 · 29 · 68
22. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.04310.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.043 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.07.02810.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.07.028 ↗
24. 10.1177/105678951347712110.1177/1056789513477121 ↗
25. Otsuka K, Date H, Kurita T (1998) Fracture process zone in concrete tension specimens by X-ray and AE techniques. Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures— Proceedings FraMCoS-3 , 12 October, pp. 1169–1182. Freiburg: AEDIFICATIO Publishers.
26. 10.1088/0957-0233/20/6/06200110.1088/0957-0233/20/6/062001 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-0-387-78747-310.1007/978-0-387-78747-3 ↗
28. 10.1177/105678951877261910.1177/1056789518772619 ↗
29. 10.1177/105678951880521810.1177/1056789518805218 ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00605.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00605.x ↗
31. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.02.00810.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.02.008 ↗
32. Veselý V · Applied Computational Mechanics · 2010 · 4 · 237
33. Volokh KY · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · 2004 · 20 · 845
34. 10.1007/BF0002084910.1007/BF00020849 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.08.01610.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.08.016 ↗
36. 10.1029/2000JB90023910.1029/2000JB900239 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0148-9062(97)00323-910.1016/S0148-9062(97)00323-9 ↗