A rate-dependent dynamic damage model in peridynamics for concrete under impact loading
Source abstract
Abstract
To study the dynamic behavior and impact damage and failure of concrete materials and structures, a dynamic damage model was reformulated under the framework of the non-local peridynamic theory in this paper. The stretch rate of material bonds, equivalent to the strain rate in classical continuum mechanics, was introduced, and a rate-dependent peridynamic model describing the dynamic damage and failure of concrete materials was then proposed, taking both the dynamic failure of bonds and the rate-sensitivity of damage evolution under different stretch rate into account. The connection between the stretch rate and strength and tensile and compressive failure of concrete materials was established in the peridynamic model. To verify the proposed dynamic damage model for concrete failure, several typical examples simulating the mixed-mode fracture of concrete specimen were investigated. The failure mode, crack propagation paths and the crack propagation speed in the specimen in different cases were captured, which agree well with the experimental results and available numerical results. After model validation, the effect of the number and length of pre-existing cracks on the dynamic failure of concrete components was investigated further.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanics and Materials, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
Funding
the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China · Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province · the National Natural Science Foundation of China · the National Key R&D Program of China
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.01910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.019 ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:6(685)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:6(685) ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0247201610.1007/BF02472016 ↗
4. Bede N (2015) Numerical and experimental study of concrete fracture under dynamic loading. PhD Thesis, University of Rijeka, Croatia.
5. 10.1002/1097-0207(20010210)50:4<993::AID-NME164>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/1097-0207(20010210)50:4<993::AID-NME164>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.02.01510.1016/j.jmps.2015.02.015 ↗
7. 10.1680/ceb-fipmc1990.3543010.1680/ceb-fipmc1990.35430 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.03010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.030 ↗
9. 10.1177/105678951665169210.1177/1056789516651692 ↗
10. 10.1177/105678951351602810.1177/1056789513516028 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-210.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-2 ↗
12. Fan HF · International Journal of Impact Engineering · 2015 · 86 · 14
13. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.05.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.05.005 ↗
14. 10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.201100240710.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2011002407 ↗
15. 10.1260/2041-4196.1.1.14510.1260/2041-4196.1.1.145 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.006 ↗
17. Holmquist TJ, Johnson GR and Cook WH (1993) A computational constitutive model for concrete subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high pressure. In: 14th international symposium on ballistics , Quebec City, Canada, 26-29 September, pp: 591600. Sweden: National Defence Research Establishment.
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.018 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.finel.2009.05.00610.1016/j.finel.2009.05.006 ↗
20. 10.1177/105678951772161610.1177/1056789517721616 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:3(585)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:3(585) ↗
22. 10.1016/0029-5493(76)90015-710.1016/0029-5493(76)90015-7 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.05.00710.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.05.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.finel.2006.10.00410.1016/j.finel.2006.10.004 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.005 ↗
26. Lin S · Engineering Mechanics · 2005 · 22 · 116
27. Malvar LJ · ACI Materials Journal · 1998 · 95 · 735
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.07.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2011.07.019 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.09.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.09.002 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.02.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.02.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00155-910.1016/S0020-7683(99)00155-9 ↗
32. Parks ML, Seleson P and Plimpton SJ (2011) Peridynamics with lammps: A user guide v0.3 beta. Report, Sandia National Laboratories, USA.
33. 10.1002/nme.115110.1002/nme.1151 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cma.2010.03.03110.1016/j.cma.2010.03.031 ↗
35. 10.1177/105678951245596810.1177/1056789512455968 ↗
36. Samiee A · Solid State Communications · 2011 · 70 · 455
37. 10.1016/0029-5493(94)90169-410.1016/0029-5493(94)90169-4 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-010.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.02610.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.026 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10659-007-9125-110.1007/s10659-007-9125-1 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0065-2156(10)44002-810.1016/S0065-2156(10)44002-8 ↗
42. 10.1177/105678951769091510.1177/1056789517690915 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.10.02910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.10.029 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.01.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.01.005 ↗
45. 10.1177/105678950809656510.1177/1056789508096565 ↗
46. 10.1177/105678951880522010.1177/1056789518805220 ↗
47. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19960515)39:9<1555::AID-NME917>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19960515)39:9<1555::AID-NME917>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
48. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.05.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.05.008 ↗
49. 10.1177/105678951880753210.1177/1056789518807532 ↗