journal article·2026-06-05Open access

Development of a Precast Column Solution Using Precast Prestressed Concrete Piles Filled with Cast-In-Place Concrete

Emmanuel Montero-Carvajal, Hansol Jang, Hwa-Ching Wang, Oguzhan Bayrak

Abstract

This paper examines a novel construction method utilizing Precast Prestressed Concrete Piles (PCP) filled with concrete cast-in-place, working as one complete column to evaluate their structural performance under varying levels of eccentricity, with the goal of introducing a new precast column system. A control specimen was constructed cast-in-place following traditional methods according to current bridge design standards and tested to establish a baseline for comparison. Once the behavior and performance of the control specimen were understood, the proposed construction methodology was applied to fabricate four specimens. These specimens were designed to investigate the effects of the internal roughness of the precast elements (PCP) and the embedment length for the connectors to the foundation and the bent cap. The specimens underwent testing using the same procedures as the control specimen to evaluate their performance and the influential factors. Test results indicated that precast specimens with a sufficiently long embedment length exhibited performance comparable to the control specimen, despite differences in internal roughness among the specimens. Conversely, precast columns featuring an intentionally roughened interior and a shorter embedment length displayed a decrease in load-carrying capacity. A composite section was achieved between the precast prestressed pile and the cast-in-place core without employing shear connectors, resulting in a satisfactory non-contact splice of the connectors in the core and prestressed strands in the pile section. This finding suggests that the proposed methodology can be effectively utilized in future construction projects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (2020). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
2. AASHTO. (2024). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 10th Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
3. ACI Committee 224. (2001). “Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures (224R-01)”. American Concrete Institute.10.14359/10632 ↗
4. ACI Committee 318. (2025). “Building Code Requirement for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-125) and Commentary of Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318R-25).” American Concrete Institute.
5. Aktan, H., Attanayake, U. (2013). “Improving Bridges with Prefabricated Precast Concrete Systems,” Western Michigan University. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26869/dot_26869_DS1.pdf.
6. Alrasyid, H., & Amalia, R. (2024). “Numerical analysis of high-strength precast concrete column with grouted sleeve connection”. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.018575210.1063/5.0185752 ↗
7. ASTM A370 (2024). “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products”. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org
8. ASTM A416 (2018). “Standard Specification for Low-Relaxation, Seven-Wire Steel Strand for Prestressed Concrete”. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org
9. ASTM C39/C39M (2021). “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens”. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org
10. ASTM C469/C469M (2010). “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression”. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org
11. Billington, S., Barnes, R., Breen, J. (1998). “A Precast Substructure Design for Standard Bridge Systems,” Research Report 1410–2F, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42217/dot_42217_DS1.pdf
12. Birely, A., Mander, J., Lee, J., McKee, C., Yole, K., & Barooah, U. (2018). “Precast, Prestressed Concrete Bent Caps: Volume 1 Preliminary Design Considerations and Experimental Test Program”. Texas A&M Transportation Institute. https://library.ctr.utexas.edu/hostedpdfs/tti/0-6863-r1-vol1.pdf
13. Caluk, N., Mantawy, I., & Azizinamini, A. (2020). Cyclic test of concrete bridge column utilizing ultra-high performance concrete shell. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/036119812090608810.1177/0361198120906088 ↗
14. Chen, H., Masud, M., Sawab, J., Huang, H.-W., Xu, B., Mo, Y., & Hsu, T. (2018). Multiscale analysis of non-contact splices at drilled shaft to bridge column interface. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.08510.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.085 ↗
15. Chen, H., Masud, M., Sawab, J., Huang, H., Xu, B., Mo, Y., & Hsu, T. (2019). Parametric study on the non-contact splices at drilled shaft to bridge column interface based on multiscale modeling approach. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.05410.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.054 ↗
16. Cheng, Z., Sritharan, S., & Ashlock, J. (2020). “Design and Performance Verification of a Bridge Column/Footing/Pile System for Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC)”. Bridge Engineering Center Iowa State University. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54608
17. Culmo, M. (2009). Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/prefab/if09010/report.pdf
18. Fawaz, G., Murcia-Delso, J., Bayrak, O. “Synthesis of Precast Column Designs for Texas Bridges,” Rep. No. 0-6978, University of Texas at Austin. Center for Transportation Research (CTR), Austin, Texas, 2019, 89 pp. https://library.ctr.utexas.edu/ctr-publications/0-6978-1.pdf
19. Fouad, F. H., Rizk, T., Stafford, E.L., Hamby, D. (2006). “A Prefabricated Precast Concrete Bridge System for the State of Alabama,” Report No. 05215, University Transportation Center for Alabama, University of Alabama. http://utca.eng.ua.edu/research/projects/?id=05215
20. Haraldsson, O., Janes, T., Eberhard, M., & Stanton, J. (2013). Seismic Resistance of Socket Connection between Footing and Precast Column. Bridge Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000041310.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000413 ↗
21. Hewes, J.T., Priestley, M.J.N. (2002). “Seismic Design and Performance of Precast Concrete Segmental Bridge Columns,” Report No. SSRP 2001/25, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California at San Diego.
22. Kim, C. S., Lee, H. J., Park, C. K., Hwang, H. J., & Park, H. G. (2017). Cyclic Loading test for concrete-filled hollow precast concrete columns produced by using a new fabrication method. Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000170310.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001703 ↗
23. Kim, C. S., Lim, W. Y., Park, H. G., & Oh, J. K. (2016). Cyclic loading test for cast-in-place concrete-filled hollow precast concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal, 113(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.14359/5168819510.14359/51688195 ↗
24. Masud, M., Chen, H., Sawab, J., Huang, H., Xu, B., Mo, Y., & Hsu, T. (2019). Performance of non-contact lap splices in geometrically dissimilar bridge column to drilled shaft connections. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.11000010.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110000 ↗
25. Masud, M., Chen, H., Wang, J., Sawab, J., Mo, Y., & Hsu, T. (2021). High-fidelity finite element simulation of non-contact splices in column-drilled shaft connections. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11218610.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112186 ↗
26. Masud, M., Sawab, J., Zhou, T., Mo, Y. L., & Hsu, T. T. (2020). “Non-Contact Splices at Drilled Shaft To Bridge Column Interface: Final Report”. University of Houston, Texas. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/55556
27. Mehrabi, A., Ali, H., Zaman, M., Baqersad, M., & Ali, S. (2021). “Development of Guide for Selection of Substructure for ABC Projects”. Florida International University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. https://abc-utc.fiu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Substructure-FIU-OU-Final-Draft-Report-Combined-corrected-1.pdf
28. Montero-Carvajal, E., Kotha, C., Small, L., Zilveti, L., Park, C., Jang, H., Bayrak, O. (2024). “Develop and Validate Precast Column Solutions for Texas Bridges”. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from https://library.ctr.utexas.edu/ctr-publications/0-7089-1.pdf
29. Murcia-Delso, J., Shing, P. B., Stavridis, A., and Liu, Y. (2013). “Required embedment length of column reinforcement extended into type II shafts.” Rep. No. SSRP–13/05, Dept. of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego. Retrieved from https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/research-innovation-system-information/documents/final-reports/ca14-2240-finalreport-a11y.pdf
30. Ou, Y.C. (2007). “Precast Segmental Post-tensioned Concrete Bridge Columns for Seismic Regions,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of New York at Buffalo.
31. Ou, Y. C., Alrasyid, H., Haber, Z. B., & Lee, H. J. (2015). Cyclic Behavior of Precast High-Strength Reinforced Concrete Columns. ACI Structural Journal, 112(6), 839–850. https://doi.org/10.14359/5168791110.14359/51687911 ↗
32. Pang, J.B.K., Steuck, K.P., Cohagen, L., Eberhard, M.O., Stanton, J.F. (2008). “Rapidly Constructible Large‐Bar Precast Bridge‐Bent Seismic Connection,” Report Mo. WA‐RD 684.2, Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington. https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/research/reports/fullreports/684.2.pdf.
33. Paudel, S., Tanapornraweekit, G., & Tangtermsirikul, S. (2022). Numerical investigation of concrete filled hollow precast composite columns subjected to lateral cyclic loading. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11358610.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113586 ↗
34. Precast Prestress Concrete Institute Northeast (PCINE). (2022). Guidelines for Precast Substructures Used in ABC. https://www.pci.org/PCI_Docs/PCI_Northeast/Technical_Resources/Bridge/2022_05_13%20PCINE-22-GPSABC.pdf
35. Precast Prestress Concrete Institute (PCI). (2025). “Bridge Design Manual Chapter 20 Precast, Prestressed Concrete Piles”. 2nd Edition. https://doi.org/10.15554/pci.mnl-133-23/ch20.10.15554/pci.mnl-133-23/ch20 ↗
36. Takatsu, H., Ousalem, H. (2023). “Development of Precast Concrete Members with Non-contact Lap Spliced Longitudinal Bars Encased in Grouted Corrugated Ducts”. In: Ilki, A., Çavunt, D., Çavunt, Y.S. (eds) Building for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient. fib Symposium 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 350. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32511-3_150.10.1007/978-3-031-32511-3_150 ↗
37. Tazarv, M., LaVoy, M., Sjurseth, T., Greeneway, E., & Wehbe, N. (2023). Analysis and design of mechanically spliced precast bridge columns. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11572610.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115726 ↗
38. Texas Department of Transportation. (2017). “Interior Bents TYPE TX28 THRU TX54 PRESTR CONC I-GIRDERS”. TxDOT. https://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/cmd/cserve/standard/bridge/IG-BIG2400-17.pdf
39. Texas Department of Transportation. (2018). “Accelerated Construction Guidelines”. TxDOT. https://ftp.txdot.gov/pub/txdot/cst/regional-workshops/accelerated-construction-guidelines.pdf
40. Texas Department of Transportation. (2024a). “Prestressed, Precast Bent Cap Option for Round Columns (PPBC-RC)”. TxDOT. Retrieved from https://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/cmd/cserve/standard/bridge/MS-PPBC-RC-24.pdf
41. Texas Department of Transportation. (2024b). “Common Foundation Detail (FD)”. TxDOT. Retrieved from https://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/cmd/cserve/standard/bridge/MS-FD-24.pdf
42. Wang, Z., Wang, J., Liu, J., Han, F., & Zhang, J. (2019). Large-scale quasi-static testing of precast bridge column with pocket connections using noncontact lap spliced bars and UHPC grout. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00649-610.1007/s10518-019-00649-6 ↗
43. Wu, X., Kang, T. H. K., Mpalla, I. B., & Kim, C. S. (2018). Axial load testing of hybrid concrete columns consisting of UHPFRC tube and normal-strength concrete core. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0275-210.1186/s40069-018-0275-2 ↗
44. Yang, Y., Nie, X., Tian, C.-y, Ding, R., & Li, R. (2022). Experimental study on seismic performance of prefabricated RC columns with non-contact lap splices. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11447010.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114470 ↗
45. Zaborac, J., & Bayrak, O. (2022). Unified approach for reinforcement development length using the partly cracked elastic stage for bond strength. Structural Concrete. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.20220011710.1002/suco.202200117 ↗