journal article·2026-04-01Open access

Evaluating the Splice Effect on the Flexural Performance of RC Beams Reinforced with Hybrid and GFRP Rebars

Salah Mohsen, Mohamed H. Makhlouf, Marwa I. Badawi, Gamal Ismail

Abstract

Abstract Lap splices play a critical role in the flexural performance of reinforced concrete (RC) members, particularly when non-ductile reinforcement, such as glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars, is used. This study experimentally and numerically investigates the influence of lap splice length on the flexural behavior of RC beams reinforced with GFRP, hybrid (GFRP–steel), and steel bars. Sixteen beams were tested under four-point bending, with varying splice lengths, splice ratios, and reinforcement configurations. Experimental results showed that splice length strongly governs the ultimate load and failure mode of RC beams. When four bars were lap-spliced at a splice length of 0.8 Ld, the steel-reinforced beam achieved the highest ultimate load (85 kN), followed by the hybrid beam, while the GFRP-reinforced beam exhibited the lowest capacity (64 kN) and a more brittle splitting-type failure. Reducing splice lengths below code limits caused ultimate-load decreases exceeding 25% in fully spliced GFRP beams, whereas reductions were significantly smaller for hybrid and steel-reinforced beams. A nonlinear finite element model developed in ABAQUS reproduced the global load–deflection response and crack patterns, with deviations generally less than 10% in the ultimate load. The findings demonstrate the high sensitivity of GFRP lap-spliced members to splice detailing and confirm that hybrid reinforcement provides a balanced response between strength, ductility, and durability, offering a practical solution for durability-critical RC structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Abbas, H., Elsanadedy, H., Alaoud, L., Almusallam, T., & Al-Salloum, Y. (2023). Effect of confining stirrups and bar gap in improving bond behavior of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bar lap splices in RC beams. Construction and Building Materials, 381, 129943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12994310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129943 ↗
2. Abdelhamed, S. S., Gamal El Din, A. A., El-Salakawy, T. S., & Deifalla, A. F. (2025). Behavior of hybrid reinforced concrete beams under influence of seawater. Banha Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21608/BJAS.2025.370101.163610.21608/BJAS.2025.370101.1636 ↗
3. Achillides, Z., & Pilakoutas, K. (2004). Bond behavior of fiber reinforced polymer bars under direct pullout conditions. Journal of Composites for Construction, 8(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:2(173)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:2(173) ↗
4. ACI Committee 440. (2015). Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars (ACI 440.1R-15). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
5. ACI Committee 318. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318–19) and Commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
6. Al-Salloum, Y., Alaoud, L., Elsanadedy, H., Albidah, A., Almusallam, T., & Abbas, H. (2022). Bond performance of GFRP bar-splicing in reinforced concrete beams. Journal of Composites for Construction, 26(4), 04022027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000119010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001190 ↗
7. Anand, N., Kiran, T., Lubloy, E., Mathews, M. E., Kanagaraj, B., & Andrushia, D. (2023). Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams with FRP bars exposed to elevated temperature. Periodica Polytechnica. Civil Engineering, 67(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.2095010.3311/PPci.20950 ↗
8. Basaran, B., & Kalkan, I. (2020). Investigation on variables affecting bond strength between FRP reinforcing bar and concrete by modified hinged beam tests. Composite Structures, 242, 112185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11218510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112185 ↗
9. Basaran, B., Kalkan, I., Bergil, E., & Erdal, E. (2021). Estimation of the FRP-concrete bond strength with code formulations and machine learning algorithms. Composite Structures, 268, 113972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11397210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113972 ↗
10. Bediwy, A. G., & El-Salakawy, E. F. (2022). Assessment of bond strength of GFRP bars embedded in fiber-reinforced cementitious composites. Journal of Composites for Construction, 26(2), 04022012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000119810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001198 ↗
11. Bi, Q. W., Wang, Q. X., & Wang, H. (2010). Study on bond properties of BFRP bars to Basalt Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Advanced Materials Research, 163, 1251–1256. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.163-167.125110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.163-167.1251 ↗
12. Chen, L., Liang, K., & Shan, Z. (2023). Experimental and theoretical studies on bond behavior between concrete and FRP bars with different surface conditions. Composite Structures, 316, 116721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11672110.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116721 ↗
13. Dong, Y.-R., Xu, Z.-D., Zeng, K., Cheng, Y., & Xu, C. (2018). Seismic behavior and cross-scale refinement model of damage evolution for RC shear walls. Engineering Structures, 167, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.09610.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.096 ↗
14. Dziomdziora, P., & Smarzewski, P. (2025). Reinforced concrete beams with FRP and hybrid steel–FRP composite bars: Load–deflection response, failure mechanisms, and design implications. Materials, 18(18), 4381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1818438110.3390/ma18184381 ↗
15. Eltantawi, I., Alnahhal, W., El Refai, A., Younis, A., Alnuaimi, N., & Kahraman, R. (2022). Bond performance of tensile lap-spliced basalt-FRP reinforcement in high-strength concrete beams. Composite Structures, 294, 114987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11498710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114987 ↗
16. Esfahani, M. R., Rakhshanimehr, M., & Mousavi, S. R. (2013). Bond strength of lap-spliced GFRP bars in concrete beams. Journal of Composites for Construction, 17(3), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000035910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000359 ↗
17. Fahmy, S. H., Fahmy, A. S., & Swelem, S. M. (2025). Investigating the load-bearing behavior of CFS steel decking. Banha Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.21608/BJAS.2025.375464.171710.21608/BJAS.2025.375464.1717 ↗
18. Fava, G., Carvelli, V., & Pisani, M. A. (2016). Remarks on bond of GFRP rebars and concrete. Composites Part b, Engineering, 93, 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.012 ↗
19. Golafshani, E. M., Rahai, A., & Sebt, M. H. (2014). Bond behavior of steel and GFRP bars in self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 61, 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.021 ↗
20. Han, J., Tian, P., Shan, Z., & Tang, D. (2025). Shear strength of double-skin truss-reinforced composite shear walls: Finite element analysis. Buildings, 15(20), 3788. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings1520378810.3390/buildings15203788 ↗
21. Hu, B., Lia, Y., Jiang, Y.-T., & Tang, H.-Z. (2020). Bond behavior of hybrid FRP-to-steel joints. Composite Structures, 237, 111936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11193610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111936 ↗
22. Jafar, J., Yulianto, H., Ambarwati, Z., & Musyaffa, M. F. (2024). Experimental study on flexural performance of lap-spliced and mechanical-spliced (clamp type) rebars in RC beams. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.2453710.56748/ejse.24537 ↗
23. Jiang, S. Y., Ye, Y., & Fei, W. (2012). Experiment on the bonding performance of BFRP bars reinforced concrete. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 174, 993–998. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.174-177.99310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.174-177.993 ↗
24. Kusnadi, R., Djamaluddin, B., Muhiddin, R., & Irmawaty, R. (2020). The bonding strength of GFRP bars embedded within concrete under direct pull-out test. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 419(1), 012062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/419/1/01206210.1088/1755-1315/419/1/012062 ↗
25. Labibzadeh, M., & Hamidi, R. (2017). Effect of stress path, size and shape on the optimum parameters of a brittle–ductile concrete model. Engineering Structures and Technologies, 9(4), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.3846/2029882X.2017.141463610.3846/2029882X.2017.1414636 ↗
26. Li, H., Xu, S., Zhang, Z., & Song, C. (2021). Experimental and numerical investigation on the corrosion effects on the bonding behavior between CFRP and steel. Composite Structures, 259, 113465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11346510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113465 ↗
27. Makhmalbaf, E., & Razaqpur, A. G. (2021). Development length of glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebar based on non-uniform bond stress. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 49(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2020-040010.1139/cjce-2020-0400 ↗
28. Omar, M. I., ElSayed, K. M., & Khaleel, G. I. (2024). Finite element analysis of strengthened R.C flat slab edge column connections subjected to punching shear. Banha Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(2), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.21608/BJAS.2024.288865.142510.21608/BJAS.2024.288865.1425 ↗
29. Pang, Y., Wu, G., Wang, H., Gao, D., & Zhang, P. (2021). Bond-slip model of the CFRP–steel interface with the CFRP delamination failure. Composite Structures, 256, 113015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11301510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113015 ↗
30. Perera, U. N. D., Arachchi, K. A. D. Y. T. K., & Gamage, J. C. P. H. (2022). An analytical approach to predict cohesion and interfacial failures of CFRP/steel composites under prolonged exposure to aqueous solutions. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0094910.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00949 ↗
31. Quayyum, S., & Rteil, A. (2011). Bond strength of FRP rebar to concrete: effect of concrete confinement. In Y. Bai, L. Teng, & J. Zhang (Eds.), Advances in FRP composites in civil engineering (pp. 957–960). Springer-Verlag.
32. Revanna, N., Moy, C. K. S., & Krevaikas, T. (2020). Verifying a finite element analysis methodology with reinforced concrete beam experiments. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 8(11), 2549–2556. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2020.81119010.4236/jamp.2020.811190 ↗
33. Saad, S., & Polak, M. A. (2025). Bond behavior of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars embedded in concrete, a review. Materials, 18(14), 3367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1814336710.3390/ma18143367 ↗
34. Shen, D., Wen, C., Zhu, P., Li, M., Ojha, B., & Li, C. (2020). Bond behavior between basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars and concrete under cyclic loading. Construction and Building Materials, 258, 119518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11951810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119518 ↗
35. Sólyom, S., & Balázs, G. L. (2020). Bond of FRP bars with different surface characteristics. Construction and Building Materials, 264, 119839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11983910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119839 ↗
36. Tian, L., Wang, L., & Xian, G. (2024). Machine learning prediction of interfacial bond strength of FRP bars with different surface characteristics to concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e03984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0398410.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03984 ↗
37. Tran, H., Nguyen-Thoi, T., & Dinh, H.-B. (2025). State-of-the-art review of studies on the flexural behavior and design of FRP-reinforced concrete beams. Materials, 18(14), 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1814329510.3390/ma18143295 ↗
38. Wang, H., & Belarbi, A. (2025). Bond-slip behavior between the steel-CFRP composite bar and hybrid fiber-reinforced coral aggregate concrete under monotonic load: Experimental study. Construction and Building Materials, 489, 142305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14230510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142305 ↗
39. Wang, M., Wang, Y., & Chen, G. (2025). Bond-slip law for the analysis of ribbed steel-FRP composite bars embedded into FRP-confined concrete. Engineering Structures, 339, 120672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.12067210.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120672 ↗
40. Wang, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Chen, G. (2024). Bond behavior and bond strength model for ribbed FRP bar in FRP-confined concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 389, 138318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13831810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138318 ↗
41. Xing, L., Sun, S., Mei, K., Guo, Y., & Yang, Z. (2024). Research progress on short-term mechanical properties of FRP bars and FRP-reinforced concrete beams. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 11(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2023.06.00510.1016/j.jtte.2023.06.005 ↗
42. Xu, L., Wang, X., Pan, J., Zhou, J., & Liu, W. (2024). Bond behavior between steel-FRP composite bars and engineered cementitious composites in pullout conditions. Engineering Structures, 299, 117086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11708610.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117086 ↗
43. Xue, W., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). Bond behavior of flexible braided AFRP tendons in high-performance concrete based on pull-out and beam tests. Journal of Building Engineering, 67, 108153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10815310.1016/j.jobe.2023.108153 ↗