Integrated Experimental and Data-Driven Approach to Strength Prediction of Mortars Incorporating Thermally Activated Construction Waste Powder
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study investigated the feasibility of waste construction powder (WCP), a by-product generated from construction waste recycling plants, as a partial replacement for Portland cement through thermal activation. Mortar specimens were prepared using thermally activated WCP at 600 °C and 800 °C, replacing cement at rates of 6%, 13%, and 20%. The flowability, compressive strength, and flexural strength were evaluated. The results showed that mortar with WCP activated at 800 °C met the KS L 5201 industrial standard even at a 20% replacement ratio, achieving up to 21% and 6% increases in compressive strength and flexural strength, respectively. In addition, a machine learning (ML) model based on the light gradient boosting (LGB) algorithm was developed using 405 literature-derived data entries to predict the compressive strength of cementitious composites incorporating thermally activated WCP. The predictive performance was validated against experimental results, achieving strong correlation with the measured data ( R 2 = 0.813), and yielding an RMSE of 3.044 MPa, MAE of 2.507 MPa, and SMAPE of 5.675%. More than 90% of the predictions fell within a ± 10% error margin. These findings demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed ML model for strength prediction of WCP-based cementitious materials, as well as the technical feasibility of thermally activated WCP as cement replacement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Asadi Shamsabadi, E., Salehpour, M., Zandifaez, P., & Dias-da-Costa, D. (2023). Data-driven multicollinearity-aware multi-objective optimisation of green concrete mixes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390, Article 136103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13610310.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136103 ↗
2. Asteris, P. G., Skentou, A. D., Bardhan, A., Samui, P., & Lourenço, P. B. (2021). Soft computing techniques for the prediction of concrete compressive strength using Non-Destructive tests. Construction and Building Materials, 303, Article 124450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12445010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124450 ↗
3. Ben Chaabene, W., Flah, M., & Nehdi, M. L. (2020). Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review. Construction and Building Materials, 260, Article 119889. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.11988910.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.119889 ↗
4. Carriço, A., Bogas, J. A., & Guedes, M. (2020a). Thermoactivated cementitious materials—a review. Construction and Building Materials, 250, Article 118873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11887310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118873 ↗
5. Carriço, A., Bogas, J. A., Real, S., & Pereira, M. F. C. (2022). Shrinkage and sorptivity of mortars with thermoactivated recycled cement. Construction and Building Materials, 333, Article 127392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12739210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127392 ↗
6. Carriço, A., Real, S., Bogas, J. A., & Costa Pereira, M. F. (2020b). Mortars with thermo activated recycled cement: Fresh and mechanical characterisation. Construction and Building Materials, 256, Article 119502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11950210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119502 ↗
7. Chen, L., Wei, M., Lei, N., & Li, H. (2024). Effect of chemical–thermal activation on the properties of recycled fine powder cementitious materials. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 20, Article e02956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0295610.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02956 ↗
8. Chen, Z., Lee, Y., Cho, H., Lee, H., & Lim, S. (2019). Improvement in carbonation resistance of Portland cement mortar incorporating γ -Dicalcium silicate. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/985673410.1155/2019/9856734 ↗
9. Davawala, M., Joshi, T., & Shah, M. (2023). Compressive strength prediction of high-strength concrete using machine learning. Emergent Materials, 6(1), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-022-00409-410.1007/s42247-022-00409-4 ↗
10. Deboucha, W., Leklou, N., Khelidj, A., & Oudjit, M. N. (2017). Hydration development of mineral additives blended cement using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA): Methodology of calculating the degree of hydration. Construction and Building Materials, 146, 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.13210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.132 ↗
11. EN 197-6. (2022). Cement—part 6: Cement with recycled building materials. British Standards Institution.
12. GB/T 25177-2010. (2010). Standard for recycled coarse aggregate for concrete. China National Standard.
13. Gomaa, E., Han, T., ElGawady, M., Huang, J., & Kumar, A. (2021). Machine learning to predict properties of fresh and hardened alkali-activated concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 115, Article 103863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10386310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103863 ↗
14. Guo, Y., Wu, S., Lyu, Z., Shen, A., Yin, L., & Xue, C. (2021). Pore structure characteristics and performance of construction waste composite powder-modified concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 269, Article 121262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12126210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121262 ↗
15. Haroon, M., Khan, R. B. N., & Khitab, A. (2024). Performance of concrete containing waste demolished concrete powder as a partial substitute for cement. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2024-000210.1108/IJBPA-01-2024-0002 ↗
16. Hu, R., Wang, C., Shen, J., & Ma, Z. (2023). Chloride transport and thermoactivated modification of sustainable cement-based materials with high-content waste concrete powder. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 23, 4012–4031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.04810.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.048 ↗
17. JIS A 5021. (2018). Recycled aggregate for concrete-class H. Japanese Standards Association. Japanese Standards Association Tokyo, Japan.
18. Jun, M.-H. (2018). Suggestions for revitalizing the use of recycled aggregate in the public sector. Magazine of RCR, 13(2), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.14190/MRCR.2018.13.2.03310.14190/MRCR.2018.13.2.033 ↗
19. Kalinowska-Wichrowska, K., Pawluczuk, E., & Bołtryk, M. (2020). Waste-free technology for recycling concrete rubble. Construction and Building Materials, 234, Article 117407. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.11740710.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.117407 ↗
20. Kim, J. (2021). Construction and demolition waste management in Korea: Recycled aggregate and its application. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23, 2223–2234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02177-x10.1007/s10098-021-02177-x ↗
21. Kim, J. (2024). Sustainable construction exploration: A review of multi-recycling of concrete waste. International Journal of Environmental Research, 18(6), 103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00652-z10.1007/s41742-024-00652-z ↗
22. Kim, J., & Kim, N. (2023). Exploring the role of thermal activation of cement exposed to the external environment on the improvement of concrete properties. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.19510.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.195 ↗
23. Kim, J., & Lee, D. (2025). Comparative study on hyperparameter tuning for predicting concrete compressive strength. Buildings, 15(13), 2173. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings1513217310.3390/buildings15132173 ↗
24. Kim, J., Nciri, N., Sicakova, A., & Kim, N. (2023). Characteristics of waste concrete powders from multi-recycled coarse aggregate concrete and their effects as cement replacements. Construction and Building Materials, 398, Article 132525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13252510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132525 ↗
25. Kim, Y. J., & Choi, Y. W. (2012). Utilization of waste concrete powder as a substitution material for cement. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.04210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.042 ↗
26. Ling, H., Qian, C., Kang, W., Liang, C., & Chen, H. (2019). Combination of Support Vector Machine and K-Fold cross validation to predict compressive strength of concrete in marine environment. Construction and Building Materials, 206, 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.07110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.071 ↗
27. Liu, K.-H., Zheng, J.-K., Pacheco-Torgal, F., & Zhao, X.-Y. (2022). Innovative modeling framework of chloride resistance of recycled aggregate concrete using ensemble-machine-learning methods. Construction and Building Materials, 337, Article 127613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12761310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127613 ↗
28. Liu, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, C., & Ma, Z. (2024). Reusing thermoactivated waste paste/concrete powder for sustainable alkali-activated materials: Effects of thermoactivated temperature. Construction and Building Materials, 437, Article 136973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13697310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136973 ↗
29. Ma, Z., Liu, M., Duan, Z., Liang, C., & Wu, H. (2020). Effects of active waste powder obtained from C&d waste on the microproperties and water permeability of concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, Article 120518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12051810.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120518 ↗
30. Ma, Z., Shen, J., Wu, H., & Zhang, P. (2022). Properties and activation modification of eco-friendly cementitious materials incorporating high-volume hydrated cement powder from construction waste. Construction and Building Materials, 316, Article 125788. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.12578810.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.125788 ↗
31. Meng, T., Hong, Y., Ying, K., & Wang, Z. (2021). Comparison of technical properties of cement pastes with different activated recycled powder from construction and demolition waste. Cement and Concrete Composites, 120, Article 104065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10406510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104065 ↗
32. Mirrashid, M., & Naderpour, H. (2021). Recent trends in prediction of concrete elements behavior using soft computing (2010–2020). Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28(4), 3307–3327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09500-710.1007/s11831-020-09500-7 ↗
33. Munir, M. J., Kazmi, S. M. S., Wu, Y. F., Lin, X., & Ahmad, M. R. (2022). Development of novel design strength model for sustainable concrete columns: A new machine learning-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, Article 131988. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.13198810.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.131988 ↗
34. Nguyen, H., Vu, T., Vo, T. P., & Thai, H. T. (2021). Efficient machine learning models for prediction of concrete strengths. Construction and Building Materials, 266, Article 120950. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.12095010.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.120950 ↗
35. Rahmati, M., & Toufigh, V. (2022). Evaluation of geopolymer concrete at high temperatures: An experimental study using machine learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372, Article 133608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13360810.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133608 ↗
36. Real, S., Carriço, A., Bogas, J. A., & Guedes, M. (2020). Influence of the treatment temperature on the microstructure and hydration behavior of thermoactivated recycled cement. Materials, 13(18), 3937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1318393710.3390/ma13183937 ↗
37. Rilem, T. C. (1994). 121-DRG. Specifications for concrete with recycled aggregates. Materials and Structures, 27(173), 557–559.
38. Sasui, S., Kim, G., Nam, J., Alam, S. F., Eu, H., Lee, Y., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Alkali activation of waste concrete powder: Effects of alkali type and concentration. Ceramics International, 49(10), 16260–16271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.22410.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.224 ↗
39. Sui, Y., Ou, C., Liu, S., Zhang, J., & Tian, Q. (2020). Study on properties of waste concrete powder by thermal treatment and application in mortar. Applied Sciences, 10(3), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1003099810.3390/app10030998 ↗
40. Sun, C., Chen, L., Xiao, J., Singh, A., & Zeng, J. (2021). Compound utilization of construction and industrial waste as cementitious recycled powder in mortar. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 170, Article 105561. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2021.10556110.1016/J.RESCONREC.2021.105561 ↗
41. Tomosawa, F., Noguchi, T., & Tamura, M. (2005). The way concrete recycling should be. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 3(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.3.310.3151/jact.3.3 ↗
42. Truong, G. T., Choi, K.-K., Nguyen, T.-H., & Kim, C.-S. (2023). Prediction of shear strength of RC deep beams using XGBoost regression with Bayesian optimization. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 27(14), 4046–4066. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2023.216935710.1080/19648189.2023.2169357 ↗
43. Vashistha, P., Oinam, Y., Kim, H.-K., & Pyo, S. (2023). Effect of thermo-mechanical activation of waste concrete powder (WCP) on the characteristics of cement mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 362, Article 129713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12971310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129713 ↗
44. Villain, G., Thiery, M., & Platret, G. (2007). Measurement methods of carbonation profiles in concrete: Thermogravimetry, chemical analysis and gammadensimetry. Cement and Concrete Research, 37(8), 1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.04.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2007.04.015 ↗
45. Wu, H., Xu, J., Yang, D., & Ma, Z. (2021a). Utilizing thermal activation treatment to improve the properties of waste cementitious powder and its newmade cementitious materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 322, Article 129074. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.12907410.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.129074 ↗
46. Wu, H., Yang, D., & Ma, Z. (2021b). Micro-structure, mechanical and transport properties of cementitious materials with high-volume waste concrete powder and thermal modification. Construction and Building Materials, 313, Article 125477. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.12547710.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.125477 ↗
47. Xi, X., Zheng, Y., Du, C., Zhang, P., & Sun, M. (2024). Study on the hydration characteristics, mechanical properties, and microstructure of thermally activated low-carbon recycled cement. Construction and Building Materials, 447, Article 138042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13804210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138042 ↗
48. Xiao, J., Ma, Z., Sui, T., Akbarnezhad, A., & Duan, Z. (2018). Mechanical properties of concrete mixed with recycled powder produced from construction and demolition waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.27710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.277 ↗
49. Xu, J.-G., Chen, S.-Z., Xu, W.-J., & Shen, Z.-S. (2021). Concrete-to-concrete interface shear strength prediction based on explainable extreme gradient boosting approach. Construction and Building Materials, 308, Article 125088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12508810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125088 ↗
50. Xu, L., Wang, J., Li, K., Lin, S., Li, M., Hao, T., et al. (2022). A systematic review of factors affecting properties of thermal-activated recycled cement. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 185, Article 106432. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2022.10643210.1016/J.RESCONREC.2022.106432 ↗
51. Xuan, D. X., & Shui, Z. H. (2011). Rehydration activity of hydrated cement paste exposed to high temperature. Fire and Materials, 35(7), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.106710.1002/fam.1067 ↗
52. Yang, Y., Tian, D., Gao, P., Zhan, B., Yu, Q., Wang, J., et al. (2024). Study on the effect and mechanism of microwave excitation on the activity of recycled powder of waste concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 429, Article 136410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13641010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136410 ↗
53. Yao, P., Yang, D., Wang, C., & Ma, Z. (2022). Upcycling of construction waste powder for sustainable ultra-high performance engineered cementitious composites: Effects of waste powder source and content. Construction and Building Materials, 349, Article 128789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12878910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128789 ↗
54. Yuan, X., Tian, Y., Ahmad, W., Ahmad, A., Usanova, K. I., Mohamed, A. M., & Khallaf, R. (2022). Machine learning prediction models to evaluate the strength of recycled aggregate concrete. Materials, 15(8), 2823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1508282310.3390/ma15082823 ↗
55. Zhang, D., Zhang, S., Huang, B., Yang, Q., & Li, J. (2022). Comparison of mechanical, chemical, and thermal activation methods on the utilisation of recycled concrete powder from construction and demolition waste. Journal of Building Engineering, 61, Article 105295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10529510.1016/j.jobe.2022.105295 ↗
56. Zhang, X., Dai, C., Li, W., & Chen, Y. (2023a). Prediction of compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete using machine learning and Bayesian optimization methods. Frontiers in Earth Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.111210510.3389/feart.2023.1112105 ↗
57. Zhang, Z., Liu, X., Hu, R., Liang, C., Zhang, Y., & Ma, Z. (2023b). Mechanical behavior of sustainable engineered cementitious composites with construction waste powder as binder and sand replacement. Construction and Building Materials, 404, Article 133185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13318510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133185 ↗