Prediction of Compressive Strength for Recycled Rubber Aggregate Concrete Using Hybrid Machine-Learning Algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents an innovative approach to predicting the compressive strength (CS) of recycled rubberized concrete (RC) using advanced hybrid machine learning (ML) algorithms. The integration of recycled rubber in concrete offers significant environmental and sustainability benefits by reducing waste and promoting circular construction practices. Its heterogeneous nature introduces complexity in accurately estimating mechanical properties through traditional empirical models. To address this challenge, five ML models, XGB, RF, GBR, and two hybrid ensembles, XGB–RF and XGB–GBR, were developed and evaluated using a data set comprising 369 experimental samples with seven key mix-design parameters. The innovation of this work lies in the development and comparison of hybrid learning frameworks, which effectively capture nonlinear relationships among input parameters and enhance model generalization beyond conventional ML techniques. Model performance was rigorously validated using statistical metrics, such as the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The XGB model achieved the highest predictive accuracy R 2 = 0.904, RMSE = 3.835 MPa, and MAE = 2.697, outperforming other individual and hybrid models. The XGB–GBR model achieved a high predictive accuracy of R 2 = 0.879, RMSE = 4.012 MPa, further validating the strength of hybrid ensemble approaches. To further interpret model behavior, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and partial dependence plot (PDP) analyses were conducted, revealing that rubberized aggregate (RA) content exerts the most significant negative influence on CS, followed by notable effects from fine aggregate, superplasticizer, and water content. The study not only highlights the effectiveness of AI-driven methods in forecasting concrete strength but also identifies optimal material proportions for mix design improvement. This research demonstrates that hybrid ML techniques provide a cost-effective, rapid, and highly accurate alternative to conventional testing for RC, offering valuable insights for sustainable material optimization and decision-making in modern civil engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Aayaz, R., et al. (2025). Evaluating mechanical and environmental impacts of sustainable natural fiber reinforced recycled aggregate concrete incorporating supervised machine learning methods. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 23, Article e05154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0515410.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05154 ↗
2. AbdelAleem, B. H., & Hassan, A. A. (2018). Development of self-consolidating rubberized concrete incorporating silica fume. Construction and Building Materials, 161, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.14610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.146 ↗
3. Ahmad, A., Farooq, F., Ostrowski, K. A., Śliwa-Wieczorek, K., & Czarnecki, S. (2021). Application of novel machine learning techniques for predicting the surface chloride concentration in concrete containing waste material. Materials, 14(9), Article 2297.10.3390/ma14092297 ↗
4. Aiello, M. A., & Leuzzi, F. (2010). Waste tyre rubberized concrete: Properties at fresh and hardened state. Waste Management (Oxford), 30(8–9), 1696–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.00510.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.005 ↗
5. Alahmari, T. S., Ullah, I., & Farooq, F. (2024). Machine learning models for estimating the compressive strength of rubberized concrete subjected to elevated temperature: Optimization and hyper-tuning. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 42, Article 101763.10.1016/j.scp.2024.101763 ↗
6. Ali, B. H. S. H., Faraj, R. H., Saeed, M. A. H., Ahmed, H. U., & Ahmed, F. W. (2024). Innovative machine learning approaches to predict the compressive strength of recycled plastic aggregate self-compacting concrete incorporating different waste ashes. Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design, 7(3), 2585–2604.10.1007/s41939-023-00356-5 ↗
7. Almaleeh, A. M., Shitote, S. M., & Nyomboi, T. (2017). Use of waste rubber tyres as aggregate in concrete. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction Technology, 8(2), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.5897/JCECT2016.042110.5897/JCECT2016.0421 ↗
8. Arachchi, V. K., Gamage, J., & Selvaranjan, K. (2022). Investigation of replacing aggregate with non-homogeneous waste tire rubber aggregate in concrete. In Proceedings of the 2022 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon), IEEE, 1–6.10.1109/MERCon55799.2022.9906163 ↗
9. Aslam, F., et al. (2022). Compressive strength prediction of rice husk ash using multiphysics genetic expression programming. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(3), 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.09.02010.1016/j.asej.2021.09.020 ↗
10. Asteris, P. G., Skentou, A. D., Bardhan, A., Samui, P., & Pilakoutas, K. (2021). Predicting concrete compressive strength using hybrid ensembling of surrogate machine learning models. Cement and Concrete Research, 145, Article 106449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.10644910.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106449 ↗
11. Azevedo, F., Pacheco-Torgal, F., Jesus, C., De Aguiar, J. B., & Camões, A. (2012). Properties and durability of HPC with tyre rubber wastes. Construction and Building Materials, 34, 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.06210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.062 ↗
12. Bachir, R., Sidi Mohammed, A. M., & Habib, T. (2018). Using artificial neural networks approach to estimate compressive strength for rubberized concrete. Periodica polytechnica civil engineering.10.3311/PPci.11928 ↗
13. Batayneh, M. K., Marie, I., & Asi, I. (2008). Promoting the use of crumb rubber concrete in developing countries. Waste Management, 28(11), 2171–2176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.03510.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.035 ↗
14. Bideci, A., Öztürk, H., Bideci, Ö. S., & Emiroğlu, M. (2017). Fracture energy and mechanical characteristics of self-compacting concretes including waste bladder tyre. Construction and Building Materials, 149, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.19110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.191 ↗
15. Bravo, M., & de Brito, J. (2012). Concrete made with used tyre aggregate: Durability-related performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 25, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.06610.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.066 ↗
16. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32.10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
17. Cakiroglu, C., Batool, F., Sangi, A. J., Fatima, B., & Nehdi, M. L. (2025). Explainable machine learning predictive model for mechanical strength of recycled ceramic tile-based concrete. Materials Today Communications, 44, Article 112139.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112139 ↗
18. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.293978510.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
19. Coffetti, D., Crotti, E., Gazzaniga, G., Carrara, M., Pastore, T., & Coppola, L. (2022). Pathways towards sustainable concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 154, Article 106718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.10671810.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106718 ↗
20. Dabiri, H., Kioumarsi, M., Kheyroddin, A., Kandiri, A., & Sartipi, F. (2022). Compressive strength of concrete with recycled aggregate; A machine learning-based evaluation. Cleaner Materials, 3, 100044.10.1016/j.clema.2022.100044 ↗
21. Das, P., Kashem, A., Rahat, J. U., & Karim, R. (2024). A comparative study of ensemble machine learning models for compressive strength prediction in recycled aggregate concrete and parametric analysis. Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-024-00409-310.1007/s41939-024-00409-3 ↗
22. Demir, F., Yesilata, B., Turgut, P., Bulut, H., & Isiker, Y. (2015). Investigation of the effects of pH, aging and scrap tire content on the dissolution behaviors of new scrap tire-concrete mixture structures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.04310.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.043 ↗
23. Dimitriou, G., Savva, P., & Petrou, M. F. (2018). Enhancing mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 158, 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.13710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.137 ↗
24. Dong, J., Wang, Q., & Guan, Z. (2012). Structural behaviour of RC beams externally strengthened with FRP sheets under fatigue and monotonic loading. Engineering Structures, 41, 24–33.10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.024 ↗
25. Dong, J.-F., Wang, Q.-Y., & Guan, Z.-W. (2016). Material and structural response of steel tube confined recycled earthquake waste concrete subjected to axial compression. Magazine of Concrete Research, 68(6), 271–282.10.1680/jmacr.14.00357 ↗
26. Dong, J., Wang, Q., Guan, Z., & Chai, H. (2022b). High-temperature behaviour of basalt fibre reinforced concrete made with recycled aggregates from earthquake waste. Journal of Building Engineering, 48, Article 103895.10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103895 ↗
27. Dong, J., Xu, Y., Guan, Z., & Wang, Q. (2022a). Freeze-thaw behaviour of basalt fibre reinforced recycled aggregate concrete filled CFRP tube specimens. Engineering Structures, 273, Article 115088.10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115088 ↗
28. Eldin, N. N., & Senouci, A. B. (1993). Rubber-tire particles as concrete aggregate. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 5(4), 478–496. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1993)5:4(478)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1993)5:4(478) ↗
29. Emiroğlu, M., Yildiz, S., & Keleştemur, M. H. (2015). A study on dynamic modulus of self-consolidating rubberized concrete. Computers and Concrete, an International Journal, 15(5), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.15.5.79510.12989/cac.2015.15.5.795 ↗
30. Etli, S., & Cemalgil, S. (2020). Effects of specimen size on the compressive strength of rubber modified self-compacting concrete. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 6(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.29132/ijpas.78948010.29132/ijpas.789480 ↗
31. Favier, A., De Wolf, C., Scrivener, K., & Habert, G. (2018). A sustainable future for the European cement and concrete industry: Technology assessment for full decarbonisation of the industry by 2050. ETH Zurich.
32. Farooq, F., Ahmed, W., Akbar, A., Aslam, F., & Alyousef, R. (2021). Predictive modeling for sustainable high-performance concrete from industrial wastes: A comparison and optimization of models using ensemble learners. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, Article 126032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12603210.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126032 ↗
33. Feng, W., et al. (2022). Prediction of thermo-mechanical properties of rubber-modified recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 318, Article 125970.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125970 ↗
34. Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/101320345110.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
35. Ganesan, N., Raj, J. B., & Shashikala, A. (2013). Flexural fatigue behavior of self compacting rubberized concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.07710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.077 ↗
36. Ganjian, E., Khorami, M., & Maghsoudi, A. A. (2009). Scrap-tyre-rubber replacement for aggregate and filler in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 23(5), 1828–1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.02010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.020 ↗
37. Gislason, P. O., Benediktsson, J. A., & Sveinsson, J. R. (2006). Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(4), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.08.01110.1016/j.patrec.2005.08.011 ↗
38. Gregori, A., Castoro, C., Marano, G. C., & Greco, R. (2019). Strength reduction factor of concrete with recycled rubber aggregates from tires. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31(8), Article 04019146. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000278310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002783 ↗
39. Gregori, A., Castoro, C., & Venkiteela, G. (2021). Predicting the compressive strength of rubberized concrete using artificial intelligence methods. Sustainability, 13(14), Article 7729. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1314772910.3390/su13147729 ↗
40. Güneyisi, E. (2010). Fresh properties of self-compacting rubberized concrete incorporated with fly ash. Materials and Structures, 43, 1037–1048. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-009-9564-110.1617/s11527-009-9564-1 ↗
41. Güneyisi, E., Gesoglu, M., Naji, N., & İpek, S. (2016). Evaluation of the rheological behavior of fresh self-compacting rubberized concrete by using the Herschel-Bulkley and modified Bingham models. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 16, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2015.09.00310.1016/j.acme.2015.09.003 ↗
42. Han, S. H., Khayat, K. H., Park, S., & Yoon, J. (2024). Machine learning-based approach for optimizing mixture proportion of recycled plastic aggregate concrete considering compressive strength, dry density, and production cost. Journal of Building Engineering, 83, Article 108393.10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108393 ↗
43. Huang, H., Guo, M., Zhang, W., & Huang, M. (2022). Seismic behavior of strengthened RC columns under combined loadings. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 27(6), 05022005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000187110.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001871 ↗
44. Huang, H., Huang, M., Zhang, W., Pospisil, S., & Wu, T. (2020). Experimental investigation on rehabilitation of corroded RC columns with BSP and HPFL under combined loadings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 146(8), 04020157.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002725 ↗
45. Huang, H., Huang, M., Zhang, W., & Yang, S. (2021a). Experimental study of predamaged columns strengthened by HPFL and BSP under combined load cases. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 17(9), 1210–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.180176810.1080/15732479.2020.1801768 ↗
46. Huang, X., Zhang, J., Sresakoolchai, J., & Kaewunruen, S. (2021b). Machine learning aided design and prediction of environmentally friendly rubberised concrete. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 1691.10.3390/su13041691 ↗
47. Idrus, M. M., Hamdan, S., Islam, M. S., Roslee, A. A., & Sobuz, H. R. (2013). The effects of binder on the physical and mechanical properties of chemically treated sawdust‐reinforced polypropylene composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 129(3), 1534–1540.10.1002/app.38842 ↗
48. Islam, M. S., Hamdan, S., Hassan, A., Talib, Z. A., & Sobuz, H. (2014). The chemical modification of tropical wood polymer composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 48(7), 783–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831347789410.1177/0021998313477894 ↗
49. Ismail, M. K., De Grazia, M. T., & Hassan, A. A. (2015). Mechanical properties of self-consolidating rubberized concrete with different supplementary cementing materials. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Transportation and Civil Engineering (ICTCE’15), London, UK. 21–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.04410.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.044 ↗
50. Ismail, M. K., & Hassan, A. A. (2016). Use of metakaolin on enhancing the mechanical properties of self-consolidating concrete containing high percentages of crumb rubber. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125, 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.04410.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.044 ↗
51. Ismail, Z. Z., & Al-Hashmi, E. A. (2008). Use of waste plastic in concrete mixture as aggregate replacement. Waste Management, 28(11), 2041–2047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.08.02310.1016/j.wasman.2007.08.023 ↗
52. Javed, M. F., et al. (2020). New prediction model for the ultimate axial capacity of concrete-filled steel tubes: An evolutionary approach. Crystals, 10(9), Article 741. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1009074110.3390/cryst10090741 ↗
53. Karalar, M., Ozturk, H., & Ozkilic, Y. O. (2023). Experimental and numerical investigation on flexural response of reinforced rubberized concrete beams using waste tire rubber. Steel and Composite Structures, 48(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2023.48.1.04310.12989/scs.2023.48.1.043 ↗
54. Kashem, A., Karim, R., Das, P., Datta, S. D., & Alharthai, M. (2024). Compressive strength prediction of sustainable concrete incorporating rice husk ash (RHA) using hybrid machine learning algorithms and parametric analyses. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 20, Article e03030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0303010.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03030 ↗
55. Kaundal, A., Chaturvedy, G. K., & Pandey, U. K. (2025). Synergistic effects of montmorillonite and rubber aggregates on concrete properties. Discover Concrete and Cement, 1(1), 23.10.1007/s44416-025-00023-7 ↗
56. Khan, M. A., et al. (2021b). Simulation of depth of wear of eco-friendly concrete using machine learning based computational approaches. Materials, 15(1), Article 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1501005810.3390/ma15010058 ↗
57. Khan, M. A., et al. (2022). Application of random forest for modelling of surface water salinity. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(4), 101635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.11.00410.1016/j.asej.2021.11.004 ↗
58. Khan, M. A., Zafar, A., Akbar, A., Javed, M. F., & Mosavi, A. (2021a). Application of gene expression programming (GEP) for the prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Materials, 14(5), 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1405110610.3390/ma14051106 ↗
59. Khan, S., et al. (2021c). Predicting the ultimate axial capacity of uniaxially loaded cfst columns using multiphysics artificial intelligence. Materials, 15(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1501003910.3390/ma15010039 ↗
60. Khatib, Z. K., & Bayomy, F. M. (1999). Rubberized Portland cement concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 11(3), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:3(206)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:3(206) ↗
61. Kou, S.-C., Poon, C.-S., & Wan, H.-W. (2012). Properties of concrete prepared with low-grade recycled aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 36, 881–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.06010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.060 ↗
62. Lee, B., Burnett, L., Miller, T., Postage, B., & Cuneo, J. (1993). Tyre rubber/cement matrix composites. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 12, 967–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0042018710.1007/BF00420187 ↗
63. Li, G., Garrick, G., Eggers, J., Abadie, C., Stubblefield, M. A., & Pang, S.-S. (2004b). Waste tire fiber modified concrete. Composites Part b: Engineering, 35(4), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.01.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2004.01.002 ↗
64. Li, G., Stubblefield, M. A., Garrick, G., Eggers, J., Abadie, C., & Huang, B. (2004a). Development of waste tire modified concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(12), 2283–2289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.013 ↗
65. Ling, T.-C. (2011). Prediction of density and compressive strength for rubberized concrete blocks. Construction and Building Materials, 25(11), 4303–4306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.07410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.074 ↗
66. Liu, Y., Dong, J., Yuan, S., Li, K., Hu, X., & Wang, Q. (2024). Variable fatigue loading effects on corrugated steel box girders with recycled concrete. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 215, Article 108526.10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.108526 ↗
67. Liu, Y., Han, Y., Shi, T., Lv, B., Zhang, F., & Zhou, X. (2026). An innovative method for preparing nano steel slag powder and analysis of carbonation reaction mechanism toward enhanced CO2 sequestration. Materials Letters, 403, Article 139411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2025.13941110.1016/j.matlet.2025.139411 ↗
68. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.0787410.48550/arXiv.1705.07874 ↗
69. Lv, J., Du, Q., Zhou, T., He, Z., & Li, K. (2019). Fresh and mechanical properties of self‐compacting rubber lightweight aggregate concrete and corresponding mortar. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019(1), 8372547. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/837254710.1155/2019/8372547 ↗
70. Ly, H.-B., Nguyen, T.-A., & Tran, V. Q. (2021). Development of deep neural network model to predict the compressive strength of rubber concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 301, Article 124081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12408110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124081 ↗
71. Mansour, W., Osama, B., Li, W., Wang, P., & Sobuz, M. H. R. (2024). Numerical response of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns externally strengthened with FRP composites subjected to cyclic loading. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 18(1), Article 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-024-00716-610.1186/s40069-024-00716-6 ↗
72. Mikulski, M., Ambrosewicz-Walacik, M., Hunicz, J., & Nitkiewicz, S. (2021). Combustion engine applications of waste tyre pyrolytic oil. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 85, Article 100915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2021.10091510.1016/j.pecs.2021.100915 ↗
73. Mishra, M., et al. (2025). Experimental assessment and data-driven hybrid machine learning quantification with parametric optimization of compressive strength of ceramic waste concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 23, Article e05043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0504310.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05043 ↗
74. Mohammed, B. S. (2010). Structural behavior and m–k value of composite slab utilizing concrete containing crumb rubber. Construction and Building Materials, 24(7), 1214–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.01810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.018 ↗
75. Mohammed, B. S., & Azmi, N. (2014). Strength reduction factors for structural rubbercrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 8, 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0265-710.1007/s11709-014-0265-7 ↗
76. Mohammed, B. S., Azmi, N. J., & Abdullahi, M. (2011). Evaluation of rubbercrete based on ultrasonic pulse velocity and rebound hammer tests. Construction and Building Materials, 25(3), 1388–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.004 ↗
77. Mohammed, B. S., Hossain, K. M. A., Swee, J. T. E., Wong, G., & Abdullahi, M. (2012). Properties of crumb rubber hollow concrete block. Journal of Cleaner Production, 23(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.03510.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.035 ↗
78. Momshad, A. M., et al. (2025). Assessing the engineering properties and environmental impact with explainable machine learning analysis of sustainable concrete utilizing waste banana leaf ash as a partial cement replacement. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2025.10088610.1016/j.clet.2025.100886 ↗
79. Nguyen, M. H., & Ly, H.-B. (2023). Development of machine learning methods to predict the compressive strength of fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete and sensitivity analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 367, Article 130339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13033910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130339 ↗
80. Niu, Y., Wang, W., Su, Y., Jia, F., & Long, X. (2024). Plastic damage prediction of concrete under compression based on deep learning. Acta Mechanica, 235(1), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-023-03743-810.1007/s00707-023-03743-8 ↗
81. Onuaguluchi, O., & Panesar, D. K. (2014). Hardened properties of concrete mixtures containing pre-coated crumb rubber and silica fume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 82, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.06810.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.068 ↗
82. Peng, Y., et al. (2024). Evaluation framework for bitumen-aggregate interfacial adhesion incorporating pull-off test and fluorescence tracing method. Construction and Building Materials, 451, Article 138773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13877310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138773 ↗
83. Pham, T. M., Chen, W., Khan, A. M., Hao, H., Elchalakani, M., & Tran, T. M. (2020). Dynamic compressive properties of lightweight rubberized concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 238, Article 117705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11770510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117705 ↗
84. Qi, B., Gao, S., & Xu, P. (2023). The application of rubber aggregate-combined permeable concrete mixture in sponge city construction. Coatings, 13(1), Article 87.10.3390/coatings13010087 ↗
85. Rahman Sobuz, M. H., et al. (2025). Comparative performance evaluation of quartz and snail shell powders modified concrete: Mechanical, machine learning, and microstructural assessments. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 36, 7766–7782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.29610.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.296 ↗
86. Safayet, M. A., Abdullah, A. A., Islam, M. F., Alahmari, T. S., Sobuz, M. H. R., & Khan, M. M. H. (2025). Combined influence of eggshell powder and nylon fiber on self-compacting concrete production: Experimental assessment and machine learning quantifications. Materials Research Express, 12(2), 025003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/adb0a610.1088/2053-1591/adb0a6 ↗
87. Shahzad, K., & Zhao, Z. (2022). Experimental study of NaOH pretreated crumb rubber as substitute of fine aggregate in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 358, Article 129448.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129448 ↗
88. Shu, J., et al. (2025). Subsurface defect area quantification of reinforced concrete structures with array ultrasound and dual-scale neural network. Journal of Building Engineering, 111, Article 113130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.11313010.1016/j.jobe.2025.113130 ↗
89. Shu, X., & Huang, B. (2014). Recycling of waste tire rubber in asphalt and portland cement concrete: An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 67, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.02710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.027 ↗
90. Siddique, R., Khatib, J., & Kaur, I. (2008). Use of recycled plastic in concrete: A review. Waste Management, 28(10), 1835–1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.01110.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.011 ↗
91. Skripkiūnas, G., Grinys, A., & Černius, B. (2007). Deformation properties of concrete with rubber waste additives. Materials Science [medžiagotyra], 13(3), 219–223.
92. Sobuz, M. H. R., et al. (2023). Performance of self-compacting concrete incorporating waste glass as coarse aggregate. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 12(5), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2022.208693610.1080/21650373.2022.2086936 ↗
93. Sobuz, M. H. R., et al. (2024a). Optimization of recycled rubber self-compacting concrete: Experimental findings and machine learning-based evaluation. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2779310.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27793 ↗
94. Sobuz, M. H. R., et al. (2024b). Optimization of recycled rubber self-compacting concrete: Experimental findings and machine learning-based evaluation. Heliyon, 10(6), Article e27793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2779310.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27793 ↗
95. Sobuz, M. H. R., et al. (2024c). High-strength self-compacting concrete production incorporating supplementary cementitious materials: Experimental evaluations and machine learning modelling. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 18(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-024-00707-710.1186/s40069-024-00707-7 ↗
96. Sobuz, M. H. R., et al. (2025a). Combined influence of modified recycled concrete aggregate and metakaolin on high-strength concrete production: Experimental assessment and machine learning quantifications with advanced SHAP and PDP analyses. Construction and Building Materials, 461, Article 139897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.13989710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.139897 ↗
97. Sobuz, M. H. R., et al. (2025b). Machine learning-based modeling to predict and parametrically optimize the compressive strength of nanomaterial concrete composites exposed to elevated temperatures. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 23, Article e05546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0554610.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05546 ↗
98. Song, Y., et al. (2025). Preparation of a novel green lithium slag expansive agent: Enhancing deformation control, crack resistance, and durability of mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 495, Article 143644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14364410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143644 ↗
99. Sun, L., Wang, X., & Zhang, C. (2024). Three-dimensional high fidelity mesoscale rapid modelling algorithm for concrete. Structures, 70, Article 107561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10756110.1016/j.istruc.2024.107561 ↗
100. Thomas, B. S., Gupta, R. C., & Panicker, V. J. (2016). Recycling of waste tire rubber as aggregate in concrete: Durability-related performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 504–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.04610.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.046 ↗