Evaluation of the KDS 14 Draft Design Method for Predicting the Shear Strength of Prestressed Concrete Beams
Source abstract
Abstract
One-way shear strength evaluation is one of the essential and complex aspects in the design of prestressed concrete (PSC) members. Current design standards adopt different empirical or semi-empirical approaches to predict the one-way shear strength of PSC members. This study evaluated the applicability of the KDS 14 draft design method, which is based on compression zone failure theory, for predicting the shear strength of slender PSC beams. The evaluation utilized the ACI-DAfStb database, comprising 331 one-way shear tests on PSC beams with and without shear reinforcement. The strength prediction of the KDS 14 draft model was compared against those of existing design codes and design-oriented models. Results indicated that the KDS 14 draft model demonstrated promising performance in predicting the shear strength of a large dataset of PSC beams, both with and without stirrups. For PSC beams without stirrups, the KDS 14 draft model exhibited better accuracy with less scatteredness compared to the ACI 318-19 and CSA A23.3:24 models, while maintaining design conservatism. For PSC beams with stirrups, the KDS 14 draft model showed predictive performance comparable to the CSA A23.3:24 model. In addition, the KDS model exhibits similar scatteredness compared to the mechanics-based model proposed Marí et al. but while providing more conservative predictions. Furthermore, parametric study and design example were conducted to understand the influence of key design parameters and the applicability of the KDS 14 draft model for PSC beams. Overall, the predictions by the KDS 14 draft model closely aligned with trends observed in experimental results across most scenarios.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2024. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 10th edition. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
2. ACI Committee, and International Organization for Standardization, ACI 318-19: Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. American Concrete Institute, 2019.
3. CEN (2002) EN1990: Eurocode—basis of structural design. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
4. CSA (Canadian Standard Association), CSA S6:19: Canadian highway bridge design code. Ottawa, Canada: CSA Group, 2019.
5. CSA (Canadian Standard Association), CSA A23.3:24: Design of Concrete Structures. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA Group, 2024.
6. Chen, W. (1982). Plasticity in reinforced concrete (pp. 204–205). McGraw-Hill.
7. Chen, Y., Wang, C. L., Zeng, B., & Zhu, H. (2024). Design method and experimental investigation of two-stage prestressed precast continuous beams. Structures, 63, 106405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10640510.1016/j.istruc.2024.106405 ↗
8. Choi, K.-K., Kim, J. C., & Park, H. G. (2016). Shear strength model of concrete beams based on compression zone failure mechanism. ACI Structural Journal. https://doi.org/10.14359/5168903210.14359/51689032 ↗
9. Choulli, Y., Marí, A. R., & Cladera, A. (2008). Shear behaviour of full-scale prestressed i-beams made with self compacting concrete. Materials and Structures, 41, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9225-110.1617/s11527-007-9225-1 ↗
10. Collins, M. P., Bentz, E. C., Sherwood, E. G., & Xie, L. (2008). An adequate theory for the shear strength of reinforced concrete structures. Magazine of Concrete Research, 60(9), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2008.60.9.63510.1680/macr.2008.60.9.635 ↗
11. De Silva, S., Mutsuyoshi, H., Witchukreangkrai, E., & Takagi, M. (2006). Experimental study on shear cracking behavior in I-shaped partially prestressed concrete beams. Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute, 28(2), 817–822.
12. Dinh, N. H., Park, S. H., Kim, S. H., & Choi, K. K. (2021). Cyclic behavioral characteristics of RC beams strengthened by U-wrapped TRM jacket with anchorage details. Engineering Structures, 247, 113205.10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113205 ↗
13. Dunkelberg, D., & Reineck, K. H. (2017). ACI-DAfStb databases 2015 with shear tests for evaluating relationships for the shear design of structural concrete members without and with stirrups. DAfStb, Germany.10.35789/fib.BULL.0085.Ch08 ↗
14. Elsamak, G., Ghalla, M., Hu, J. W., Albogami, A., Emara, M., & Ahmed, S. O. (2024). Embedded aluminum sections and prestressed high-performance concretes for improving shear performance of RC beams. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 22, e04168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0416810.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04168 ↗
15. Elzanaty, A. H., & Nilson, A. H. (1986). Shear capacity of prestressed concrete beams using high-strength concrete. ACI Journal Proceedings, 83(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.14359/1043610.14359/10436 ↗
16. Eurocode 2 (EC 2). Design of concrete structures - Part I: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization Brussels; 2002.
17. fib (Fédération Internationale du Béton): Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010.
18. Hanson, J. M., & Hulsbos, C. L. (1964). Ultimate shear tests of prestressed concrete i-beams under concentrated and uniform loadings. Journal of PCI, 9(256), 15–28.10.15554/pcij.06011964.15.28 ↗
19. Hassan, B. R., & Yousif, A. R. (2024). Effect of size factor and tapered angles on the shear behavior and strength of haunched beams reinforced with basalt fiber reinforced polymer rebars: Experimental and analytical study. Structures, 61, 106036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10603610.1016/j.istruc.2024.106036 ↗
20. Hegger, J., & Görtz, S. (2003). Analyse des Schubrissverhaltens und dessen Auswirkungen auf die Querkrafttragfähigkeit. Schlussbericht (DBV-Nr. 227), Institutsbericht Nr. 86/2003, RWTH Aachen (in German).
21. Johnson, M. K., & Ramirez, J. A. (1989). Minimum shear reinforcement in beams with higher strength concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 86(4), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.14359/289610.14359/2896 ↗
22. Jumaa, G. B., & Yousif, A. R. (2019). Size effect on the shear failure of high-strength concrete beams reinforced with basalt FRP bars and stirrups. Construction and Building Materials, 209, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.07610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.076 ↗
23. Kani, G. N. J. (1964). The riddle of shear failure and its solution. Journal Proceedings, 61(4), 441–468. https://doi.org/10.14359/779110.14359/7791 ↗
24. Kar, J. N. (1968). Diagonal cracking in prestressed concrete beams. Journal of the Structural Division, 94(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.000187610.1061/JSDEAG.0001876 ↗
25. KCI (Korea Concrete Institute), KDS 14 20 22: Design code for shear and torsion of concrete structures. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (revision draft), 2024.
26. Kuchma, D. A., Hawkins, N. M., Kim, S. H., Sun, S., & Kim, K. S. (2008). Simplified shear provisions of the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. PCI Journal, 53(3), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05012008.53.7310.15554/pcij.05012008.53.73 ↗
27. Laskar, A., Hsu, T. T., & Mo, Y. L. (2010). Shear strengths of prestressed concrete beams part 1: Experiments and shear design equations. ACI Structural Journal. https://doi.org/10.14359/5166369810.14359/51663698 ↗
28. Leonhardt, F., & Walther, R. (1962). Schubversuche an einfeldrigen Stahlbetonbalken mit und ohne Schubbewehrung zur Ermittlung der Schubtragfähigkeit und der oberen Schubspannungsgrenze. W. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, Germany.
29. Liu, J., Alexander, J., & Li, Y. (2023). Probabilistic error assessment and correction of design code-based shear strength prediction models for reliability analysis of prestressed concrete girders. Engineering Structures, 279, 115664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11566410.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115664 ↗
30. Liu, J., Alexander, J., & Li, Y. (2025). Gaussian process regression-based model error diagnosis and quantification using experimental data of prestressed concrete beams in shear. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part a: Civil Engineering, 11(1), 04024095. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-145510.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1455 ↗
31. Marí, A., Bairán, J. M., Cladera, A., & Oller, E. (2016). Shear design and assessment of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams based on a mechanical model. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(10), 04016064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000153910.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001539 ↗
32. Megahed, K. (2024a). Prediction and reliability analysis of shear strength of RC deep beams. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 14590. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64386-w10.1038/s41598-024-64386-w ↗
33. Megahed, K. (2024b). STM-based symbolic regression for strength prediction of RC deep beams and corbels. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 25066. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74803-910.1038/s41598-024-74803-9 ↗
34. Morrow, J., & Viest, I. M. (1957). Shear strength of reinforced concrete frame members without web reinforcement. ACI Journal Proceedings, 53(3), 833–869. https://doi.org/10.14359/1155810.14359/11558 ↗
35. Muguruma, A.,Watanabe, F., & Fujii, M. (1983). Experimental study on shear resisting behavior of prestressed reinforced concrete beams. Transactions of the Japan Concrete Institute, pp. 453–456 (in Japanese).
36. Muhammad, J. H., & Yousif, A. R. (2023). Effect of basalt minibars on the shear strength of BFRP-reinforced high-strength concrete beams. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 18, e02020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e0202010.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02020 ↗
37. Park, H. G., Choi, K.-K., & Wight, J. K. (2006). Strain-based shear strength model for slender beams without web reinforcement. ACI Structural Journal, 103(6), 783. https://doi.org/10.14359/1822810.14359/18228 ↗
38. Park, H. G., Kang, S., & Choi, K. K. (2013). Analytical model for shear strength of ordinary and prestressed concrete beams. Engineering Structures, 46, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.01510.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.015 ↗
39. Park, S. H., Dinh, N. H., Kim, S. H., Lee, S. J., & Choi, K. K. (2021). Direct shear behavior of precast panel connections with cast-in-place shear keys using steel fiber-reinforced cementitious mortar (SFRCM). Structures, 32, 2130–2142.10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.025 ↗
40. Perera, S. V. T., & Mutsuyoshi, H. (2013). Shear behavior of reinforced high-strength concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal. https://doi.org/10.14359/5168432810.14359/51684328 ↗
41. Pham, H. H., Dinh, N. H., & Choi, K. K. (2023). Tensile behavior of lightweight carbon textile-reinforced cementitious composites with dispersed fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 384, 131455.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131455 ↗
42. Rupf, M., Ruiz, M. F., & Muttoni, A. (2013). Post-tensioned girders with low amounts of shear reinforcement: Shear strength and influence of flanges. Engineering Structures, 56, 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.02410.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.024 ↗
43. Saqan, E. I., & Frosch, R. J. (2009). Influence of flexural reinforcement on shear strength of prestressed concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal, 106(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.14359/5628410.14359/56284 ↗
44. Sozen, M. A., & Hawkins, N. M. (1962). Discussion of “shear and diagonal tension” by ACI-ASCE Committee 326 (426). ACI Journal Proceedings, 59(9), 1341–1347.
45. Tao, X., & Du, G. (1985). Ultimate stress of unbonded tendons in partially prestressed concrete beams. PCI Journal, 30(6), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011985.72.9110.15554/pcij.11011985.72.91 ↗
46. Taylor, H. P. (1972). Shear strength of large beams. Journal of the Structural Division, 98(11), 2473–2490. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.000337610.1061/JSDEAG.0003376 ↗
47. Thoma, S., & Fischer, O. (2023). Experimental investigations on the shear strength of prestressed beam elements with a focus on the analysis of crack kinematics. Structural Concrete, 24(4), 4993–5010. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.20220069910.1002/suco.202200699 ↗
48. Vecchio, F. J., & Collins, M. P. (1986). The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear. ACI Journal, 83(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.14359/1041610.14359/10416 ↗
49. Zhang, T., Visintin, P., Oehlers, D. J., & Griffith, M. C. (2014a). Presliding shear failure in prestressed RC beams. I: Partial-interaction mechanism. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(10), 04014069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000098810.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000988 ↗
50. Zhang, T., Visintin, P., Oehlers, D. J., & Griffith, M. C. (2014b). Presliding shear failure in prestressed RC beams. II: Behavior. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(10), 04014070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000098410.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000984 ↗
51. Zwoyer, E. M., & Siess, C. P. (1954). Ultimate strength in shear of simply-supported prestressed concrete beams without web reinforcement. ACI Journal Proceedings, 51(10), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.14359/1167310.14359/11673 ↗