journal article·2017-09Open access

Analytical Study of Force–Displacement Behavior and Ductility of Self-centering Segmental Concrete Columns

Reza Hassanli, Osama Youssf, Julie Mills, Mostafa Fakharifar

Abstract

In this study the behavior of unbonded post-tensioned segmental columns (UPTSCs) was investigated and expressions were proposed to estimate their ductility and neutral axis (NA) depth at ultimate strength. An analytical method was first employed to predict the lateral force–displacement, and its accuracy was verified against experimental results of eight columns. Two stages of parametric study were then performed to investigate the effect of different parameters on the behavior of such columns, including concrete compressive strength, axial stress ratio, diameter and height of the column, axial stress level, duct size, stress ratio of the PT bars, and thickness and ultimate tensile strain of fiber reinforced polymer wraps. It was found that the column’s aspect ratio and axial stress ratio were the most influential factors contributing to the ductility, and axial stress ratio and column diameter were the main factors contributing to the NA depth of self-centering columns. While at aspect ratios of less than ten, as the axial stress ratio increased, the ductility increased; at aspect ratios higher than ten, the ductility tended to decrease when the axial stress ratio increased. Using the results of parametric study, nonlinear multivariate regression analyses were performed and new expressions were developed to predict the ductility and NA depth of UPTSCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Bu, Z.-Y., & Ou, Y.-C. (2013). Simplified analytical pushover method for precast segmental concrete bridge columns. Advances in Structural Engineering, 16, 805–822.10.1260/1369-4332.16.5.805 ↗
2. Bu, Z.-Y., Ou, Y.-C., Song, J.-W., Zhang, N.-S., & Lee, G. C. (2015). Cyclic loading test of unbonded and bonded posttensioned precast segmental bridge columns with circular section. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21, 04015043.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000807 ↗
3. Cao, Z., Guo, T., Xu, Z., & Lu, S. (2015). Theoretical analysis of self-centering concrete piers with external dissipators. Earthquakes and Structures, 9, 1313–1336.10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1313 ↗
4. Chang, K., Loh, C., Chiu, H., Hwang, J., Cheng, C., & Wang, J. (2002). Seismic behavior of precast segmental bridge columns and design methodology for applications in Taiwan. Taipei: Taiwan Area National Expressway Engineering Bureau.
5. Chou, C.-C., Chang, H.-J., & Hewes, J. T. (2013). Two-plastic-hinge and two dimensional finite element models for post-tensioned precast concrete segmental bridge columns. Engineering Structures, 46, 205–217.10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.009 ↗
6. Chou, C. C., & Chen, Y. C. (2006). Cyclic tests of post-tensioned precast CFT segmental bridge columns with unbonded strands. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, 159–175.10.1002/eqe.512 ↗
7. Dawood, H., ElGawady, M., & Hewes, J. (2011). Behavior of segmental precast posttensioned bridge piers under lateral loads. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 17(5), 735–746.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000252 ↗
8. ElGawady, M., Booker, A., & Dawood, H. (2010). Seismic behavior of posttensioned concrete-filled fiber tubes. Journal of Composites for Construction, 14(5), 616–628.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000107 ↗
9. ElGawady, M., & Sha’lan, A. (2011). Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge bents. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 16(3), 328–339.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000174 ↗
10. Hadi, M. N. (2009). Behaviour of eccentric loading of FRP confined fibre steel reinforced concrete columns. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 1102–1108.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.024 ↗
11. Hassanli R. (2015). Behavior of unbonded post-tensioned masonry walls. PhD Thesis, University of South Australia, South Australia.
12. Hassanli, R., ElGawady, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Plastic hinge length of unbonded post-tensioned masonry walls. 12th North American Masonry. Denver: The Masonry Society.
13. Hassanli, R., ElGawady, M. A., & Mills, J. E. (2016a). Force–displacement behavior of unbonded post-tensioned concrete walls. Engineering Structures, 106, 495–505.10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.035 ↗
14. Hassanli, R., ElGawady, M., & Mills, J. (2016b). Experimental investigation of in-plane cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned masonry walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142, 04015171.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001450 ↗
15. Hassanli, R., ElGawady, M., & Mills, J. (2017a). In-plane flexural strength of unbonded post-tensioned concrete masonry walls. Engineering Structures, 136, 245–260.10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.016 ↗
16. Hassanli, R., Youssf, O., & Mills, J. (2017b). Seismic performance of precast post-tensioned aegmental crumb rubber concrete columns. Journal of Composites for Construction, 21, 04017006.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000789 ↗
17. Henry RS. Self-centering precast concrete walls for buildings in regions with low to high seismicity. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland. Auckland, New Zealand; 2011.
18. Hewes, J. T., & Priestley, M. J. N. (2002). Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns. Berkeley, CA: Dept. of Structural Engineering, University of California.
19. Ho, J., & Pam, H. (2002). Flexural strength and ductility performance of high-strength reinforced concrete columns. Structural Engineering, 80, 26–34.
20. IBC I. International building code. International Code Council, Inc (formerly BOCA, ICBO and SBCCI). 2006;4051:60478–65795.
21. Kent, D. C., & Park, R. (1971). Flexural members with confined concrete. Journal of the Structural Division, 97(7), 1969–1990.10.1061/JSDEAG.0002957 ↗
22. Kim, T.-H. (2013). Comparison of totally prefabricated bridge substructure designed according to Korea Highway Bridge Design (KHBD) and AASHTO-LRFD. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 7, 319–332.10.1007/s40069-013-0050-3 ↗
23. Kim, J., & Choi, H. (2015). Monotonic loading tests of RC beam-column subassemblage strengthened to prevent progressive collapse. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9, 401–413.10.1007/s40069-015-0119-2 ↗
24. Kim, T.-H., Lee, H.-M., Kim, Y.-J., & Shin, H. (2010). Performance assessment of precast concrete segmental bridge columns with a shear resistant connecting structure. Engineering Structures, 32, 1292–1303.10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.007 ↗
25. Kim, D. H., Moon, D. Y., Kim, M. K., Zi, G., & Roh, H. (2015). Experimental test and seismic performance of partial precast concrete segmental bridge column with cast-in-place base. Engineering Structures, 100, 178–188.10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.034 ↗
26. Kim, T.-H., Seong, D.-J., & Shin, H. M. (2012). Seismic performance assessment of hollow reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridge columns. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 6, 165–176.10.1007/s40069-012-0015-y ↗
27. Kurama, Y. C., Sause, R., Pessiki, S., & Lu, L. W. (2002). Seismic response evaluation of unbonded post-tensioned precast walls. ACI Structural Journal, 99(5), 641–651.
28. Kwan, W.-P., & Billington, S. L. (2003). Unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge piers. I: Monotonic and cyclic analyses. Journal of Bridge Engineering., 8, 92–101.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:2(92) ↗
29. Lam L, Teng J. (2001). A new stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete. FRP Composites in Civil Engineering Proceedings of the International Conference on FRP composites in Civil Engineering (pp. 283–292). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company.
30. Lam, L., & Teng, J. (2003). Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 17, 471–489.10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X ↗
31. Marriott, D., Pampanin, S., & Palermo, A. (2009). Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 38, 331–354.10.1002/eqe.857 ↗
32. Motaref, S., Saiidi, M., & Sanders, D. (2010). Experimental study of precast bridge columns with built-in elastomer. Transportation Research Record, 2202, 109–116.10.3141/2202-14 ↗
33. Motaref, S., Saiidi, M. S., & Sanders, D. (2013). Shake table studies of energy dissipating segmental bridge columns. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 19, 186–199.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000518 ↗
34. Ou, Y.-C., Chiewanichakorn, M., Aref, A. J., & Lee, G. C. (2007). Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133, 1636–1647.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1636) ↗
35. Ou, Y.-C., Oktavianus, Y., & Tsai, M.-S. (2013). An emulative precast segmental concrete bridge column for seismic regions. Earthquake Spectra, 29, 1441–1457.10.1193/082511EQS205M ↗
36. Ou, Y. C., Tsai, M. S., Chang, K. C., & Lee, G. C. (2010). Cyclic behavior of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with high performance or conventional steel reinforcing bars as energy dissipation bars. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39, 1181–1198.10.1002/eqe.986 ↗
37. Ou, Y.-C., Wang, P.-H., Tsai, M.-S., Chang, K.-C., & Lee, G. C. (2009). Large-scale experimental study of precast segmental unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136, 255–264.
38. Ozbakkaloglu, T., Lim, J. C., & Vincent, T. (2013). FRP-confined concrete in circular sections: Review and assessment of stress–strain models. Engineering Structures, 49, 1068–1088.10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.010 ↗
39. Palermo, A., Pampanin, S., & Marriott, D. (2007). Design, modeling, and experimental response of seismic resistant bridge piers with posttensioned dissipating connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133, 1648–1661.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1648) ↗
40. Pampanin, S., Priestley, M. N., & Sritharan, S. (2001). Analytical modelling of the seismic behaviour of precast concrete frames designed with ductile connections. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 5, 329–367.
41. Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced concrete structures (pp. 53–54). New York: Wiley.10.1002/9780470172834 ↗
42. Perez, F., Sause, R., & Pessiki, S. (2007). Analytical and experimental lateral load behavior of unbonded posttensioned precast concrete walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(11), 1531–1540.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1531) ↗
43. Priestley, M. (2002). Direct displacement-based design of precast/prestressed concrete buildings. PCI Journal, 47, 66–79.10.15554/pcij.11012002.66.79 ↗
44. Priestley M, Calvi G, Kowalsky M. (2007). Direct displacement-based seismic design of structures. In NZSEE conference 2007.
45. Priestley, M., & Park, R. (1987). Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading. ACI Structural Journal, 84, 61–76.
46. Priestley, M., Seible, F., & Calvi, G. (1996a). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Newyork: Wiley.10.1002/9780470172858 ↗
47. Priestley, M. N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G. M. (1996b). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9780470172858 ↗
48. Priestley, M., Sritharan, S., Conley, J. R., & Pampanin, S. (1999). Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building. PCI Journal, 44, 42–67.10.15554/pcij.11011999.42.67 ↗
49. Roh, H., & Reinhorn, A. M. (2010). Hysteretic behavior of precast segmental bridge piers with superelastic shape memory alloy bars. Engineering Structures, 32, 3394–3403.10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.013 ↗
50. Roh, H., Reinhorn, A. M., & Lee, J. S. (2012). Modeling and cyclic behavior of segmental bridge column connected with shape memory alloy bars. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 11, 375–389.10.1007/s11803-012-0128-y ↗
51. Shajil, N., Srinivasan, S. M., & Santhanam, M. (2016). An experimental study on self-centering and ductility of pseudo-elastic shape memory alloy (PESMA) fiber reinforced beam and beam-column joint specimens. Materials and Structures, 49, 783–793.10.1617/s11527-015-0538-1 ↗
52. Shim, C. S., Chung, C.-H., & Kim, H. H. (2008). Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of precast segmental bridge piers with a circular solid section. Engineering Structures, 30, 3782–3792.10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.005 ↗
53. Sideris, P. (2015). Nonlinear quasi-static analysis of hybrid sliding–rocking bridge columns subjected to lateral loading. Engineering Structures, 101, 125–137.10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.053 ↗
54. Wang, J. C., Ou, Y. C., Chang, K. C., & Lee, G. C. (2008). Large-scale seismic tests of tall concrete bridge columns with precast segmental construction. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 1449–1465.10.1002/eqe.824 ↗
55. Wight, G. D., Kowalsky, M. J., & Ingham, J. M. (2007). Direct displacement-based seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned masonry walls. ACI Structural Journal, 104(5), 560–569.
56. Yamashita, R., & Sanders, D. (2009). Seismic performance of precast unbonded prestressed concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal, 106, 821–830.
57. Youssf, O., ElGawady, M. A., & Mills, J. E. (2015a). Experimental investigation of crumb rubber concrete columns under seismic loading. Structures (pp. 13–27). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
58. Youssf, O., ElGawady, M. A., & Mills, J. E. (2015b). Displacement and plastic hinge length of FRP-confined circular reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Structures, 101, 465–476.10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.026 ↗
59. Youssf, O., ElGawady, M. A., & Mills, J. E. (2016). Static cyclic behaviour of FRP-confined crumb rubber concrete columns. Engineering Structures, 113, 371–387.10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.033 ↗