journal article·2025-09-09Open access

Maximum Shear Strength Limit for Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams

Jung-Yoon Lee, Yeonje Choi, DongIk Shin

Abstract

Although it is widely known that the shear strength of reinforced concrete (RC) deep beams is higher than that of general RC beams to which Bernoulli’s assumption can be applied, the maximum shear strength limit of deep beams is identical to that of general beams. Therefore, the shear strength of deep beams is limited to a low value due to the shear strength limit in many cases. Different codes currently in use have different limit values for the maximum shear strength of deep beams. The strength limit of deep beams in the ACI 318–19 code is a function of the square root of concrete compressive strength ( $$\sqrt{{{\varvec{f}}}_{{\varvec{c}}}\boldsymbol{\prime}}$$ ), but that in the AASHTO-LRFD code is a linear function of $${{\varvec{f}}}_{{\varvec{c}}}\boldsymbol{\prime}$$ . Therefore, the ACI 318–19 code tends to underestimate the shear strength of deep beams with high-strength concrete. In addition, because the strength limits of the two codes do not consider the influences of the shear span-to-depth ratio, they may overestimate the strength of large-size deep beams with a large shear span-to-depth ratio. In this study, an equation for evaluating the maximum shear strength limit of deep beams was developed and verified against the experimental results, considering the effective compressive strength of concrete, shear span-to-depth ratio. The proposed maximum strength limit of deep beams was compared with the shear strengths of 672 deep beams, and the results indicated that the prediction closely matched the measured strength limit. The coefficient of variation of the shear strength ratio of ACI318-19 code was 39.2%, while that of the proposed equation was 32.3%, which was the smallest among the three predictions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO LRFD. (2020). Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition. Washington, DC, American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials.
2. ACI Committee 318 .(1999). 318–99/318R-99: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete & Commentary. American Concrete Institute.
3. ACI Committee 318. (2002). Building code requirements for structural concrete:(ACI 318–02) and commentary (ACI 318R-02). American Concrete Institute.
4. ACI Committee 318. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318–19) and Commentary (ACI 318R–19). American Concrete Institute.
5. ACI Committee 445. (2002). Examples for the design of structural concrete with strut-and-tie models. American Concrete Institute.
6. BD-002 Concrete Structures Committee. (2009). AS 3600–2009—Standards for concrete structures. Standards.
7. Bediwy, A. G., & El-Salakawy, E. F. (2021). Ductility and performance assessment of glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete deep beams incorporating cementitious composites reinforced with basalt fiber pellets. ACI Structural Journal, 118(4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.14359/5173264610.14359/51732646 ↗
8. Brown, M. D. (2005). Design for shear in reinforced concrete using strut-and-tie and sectional models. The University of Texas at Austin.
9. Comité Euro-International du Béton. (1993). 0727739441: CEB-FIP model code 1990: Design code. Thomas Telford Publishing.10.1680/ceb-fipmc1990.35430 ↗
10. Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). (2004). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures, Part 1–1 general rules and rules for buildings (EC2-04). CEN.
11. Crist, R. A. (1966). Shear behavior of deep reinforced concrete beams. In Symposium on the Effects of RepeatedLoading of Materials and Structural Elements (Mexico City, 1966), vol. 4, pp. 31.
12. CSA Committee A23.3–19. (2019). Design of concrete structures for buildings (CSA A23.3–19). Canadian Standards Association.
13. de Paiva, H. R., & Siess, C. P. (1965). Strength and behavior of deep beams in shear. Journal of the Structural Division, 91(5), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.000132910.1061/JSDEAG.0001329 ↗
14. Foster, S. J. (1998). Design of non-flexural members for shear. Cement and Concrete Composites, 20(6), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00029-810.1016/S0958-9465(98)00029-8 ↗
15. Foster, S. J., & Gilbert, R. I. (1998). Experimental studies on high-strength concrete deep beams. ACI Structural Journal, 95(4), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.14359/55410.14359/554 ↗
16. Foster, S. J., & Malik, A. R. (2002). Evaluation of efficiency factor models used in strut-and-tie modeling of nonflexural members. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(5), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:5(569)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:5(569) ↗
17. Hwang, S. J., Yang, Y. H., & Li, Y. A. (2021). Maximum shear strength of reinforced concrete deep beams. ACI Structural Journal, 118(6), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.14359/5173307610.14359/51733076 ↗
18. Imjai, T., Aosai, P., Garcia, R., Raman, S. N., & Chaudhary, S. (2024). Deflections of high-content recycled aggregate concrete beams reinforced with GFRP bars and steel fibres. Engineering Structures, 312, 118247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11824710.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118247 ↗
19. Imjai, T., Guadagnini, M., Garcia, R., & Pilakoutas, K. (2016). A practical method for determining shear crack induced deformation in FRP RC beams. Engineering Structures, 126, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.00710.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.007 ↗
20. Imjai, T., Kefyalew, F., Aosai, P., Garcia, R., Kim, B., Abdalla, H. M., & Raman, S. N. (2023). A new equation to predict the shear strength of recycled aggregate concrete Z push-off specimens. Cement and Concrete Research, 169, 107181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.10718110.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107181 ↗
21. Kong, F. K. (1990). Reinforced concrete deep beams. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
22. Larson, N., Gomez, E. F., Garber, D., Bayrak, O., & Ghannoum, W. (2013). Strength and serviceability design of reinforced concrete inverted-T beams. Report.
23. Lee, J. Y., Haroon, M., Shin, D., & Kim, S. W. (2021). Shear and torsional design of reinforced concrete members with high-strength reinforcement. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 147(2), 04020327. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000288710.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002887 ↗
24. Lee, J. Y., & Hwang, H. B. (2010). Maximum shear reinforcement of reinforced concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal, 107(5), 580–588. https://doi.org/10.14359/5166390910.14359/51663909 ↗
25. Lee, J. Y., & Kang, Y. M. (2021). Strut-and-tie model without discontinuity for reinforced concrete deep beams. ACI Structural Journal, 118(5), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.14359/5173282410.14359/51732824 ↗
26. Leelatanon, S., Imjai, T., Setkit, M., Garcia, R., & Kim, B. (2022). Punching shear capacity of recycled aggregate concrete slabs. Buildings, 12(10), 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings1210158410.3390/buildings12101584 ↗
27. Ms, S., Nagarajan, P., & AP, S. (2022). Behavior of steel fiber-reinforced rubcrete deep beams under shear. ACI Structural Journal, 119(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.14359/5173300310.14359/51733003 ↗
28. Nielsen, M., Braestrup, M., Jensen, B. & Bach, F. (1978). Concrete Plasticity: Beam Shear—Shear in Joints—Punching Shear. Danish Society for Structural Science and Engineering, 1–129.
29. Proestos, G. T., Bentz, E. C., & Collins, M. P. (2018). Maximum shear capacity of reinforced concrete members. ACI Structural Journal, 115(5), 1463–1473. https://doi.org/10.14359/5170225210.14359/51702252 ↗
30. Rogowsky, D. M., MacGregor, J. G., & Ong, S. Y. (1986). Tests of reinforced concrete deep beams. ACI Journal Proceedings., 83, 614–623.
31. Russo, G., Somma, G., & Mitri, D. (2005). Shear strength analysis and prediction for reinforced concrete beams without stirrups. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:1(66)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:1(66) ↗
32. Setkit, M., Leelatanon, S., Imjai, T., Garcia, R., & Limkatanyu, S. (2021). Prediction of shear strength of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete beams without stirrups. Buildings, 11(9), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings1109040210.3390/buildings11090402 ↗
33. Shin, S. W., Lee, K. S., Moon, J. I., & Ghosh, S. K. (1999). Shear strength of reinforced high-strength concrete beams with shear span-to-depth ratios between 1.5 and 2.5. ACI Structural Journal, 96(4), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.14359/69110.14359/691 ↗
34. Smith K. & Vantsiotis A. (1982). Shear strength of deep beams. In ACI Journal Proceedings, pp. 201–213.
35. Tan, K., & Cheng, G. (2006). Size effect on shear strength of deep beams: Investigating with strut-and-tie model. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132(5), 673–685.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:5(673) ↗
36. Walravena, J., & Lehwalter, N. (1994). Size effects in short beams loaded in shear. ACI Structural Journal, 91(5), 585–593. https://doi.org/10.14359/417710.14359/4177 ↗
37. Watanabe F & Ichinose T. (1991). Strength and ductility design of RC members subjected to combined bending and shear. In Proceedings of Workshop on Concrete in Earthquake. University of Houston Texas, USA, pp. 429–438.
38. Watanabe, M., Tanaka, Y., & Shimomura, T. (2008). Size-effect of shear strength and estimation method of shear capacity of deep beam. Journal of JSCE, 64(4), 683–697. https://doi.org/10.2208/jsceje.64.68310.2208/jsceje.64.683 ↗
39. Yang, K. H., Chung, H. S., Lee, E. T., & Eun, H. C. (2003). Shear characteristics of high-strength concrete deep beams without shear reinforcements. Engineering Structures, 25(10), 1343–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00110-X10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00110-X ↗
40. Zhang, N., & Tan, K. H. (2007). Size effect in RC deep beams: Experimental investigation and STM verification. Engineering Structures, 29(12), 3241–3254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.00510.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.005 ↗