journal article·2025-03-17Open access

Consideration on Application of Nondestructive Test to Estimate In-Situ Compressive Strength of Concrete: A Case Study

Seung-Hee Kwon, Jung-Soo Lee, Gi-Beom Ji, Hyeong-Ki Kim

Abstract

Abstract To comprehensively explore the utility of non-destructive tests (NDT) results for structural diagnosis, this study collected NDT results and core compressive strength test results from aged bridges. Girders and slabs were obtained from seven such bridges, and after sectioning, rebound hardness test (RHT) or ultrasonic pulse velocity test (UPVT) were conducted alongside coring. The standard equations for estimation in South Korea were applied and a comparison between core strength and strength estimated using NDT results was conducted. In addition, the relationship between the static modulus and core specimen strength was determined to assess the soundness of the concrete cores, a factor that influences NDT signals. Based on the experimental results, this study deliberates on the practical applications of NDT results in structural diagnosis. A protocol for calculating the characteristic in-situ compressive strength using NDT results without coring was proposed and statistically validate this protocol via a probabilistic simulation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Ali-Benyahia, K., et al. (2023). Analysis of the accuracy of in-situ concrete characteristic compressive strength assessment in real structures using destructive and non-destructive testing methods. Construction and Building Materials, 366, 130161.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130161 ↗
2. Alwash, M., Breysse, D., & Sbartaï, Z. M. (2015). Non-destructive strength evaluation of concrete: Analysis of some key factors using synthetic simulations. Construction and Building Materials, 99, 235–245.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.023 ↗
3. Breysse, D., et al. (2020). Risk evaluation on concrete strength assessment with NDT technique and conditional coring approach. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101541.10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101541 ↗
4. Breysse, D., & Balayssac, J.-P. (2021). Non-destructive in situ strength assessment of concrete. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-64900-5 ↗
5. Cho, Y., et al. (2014). Estimation of compressive strength of high-strength concrete with recycled aggregate using non-destructive test and numerical analysis. Materials Research Innovations. https://doi.org/10.1179/1432891714Z.00000000041510.1179/1432891714Z.000000000415 ↗
6. Crawford, G. (1997). Guide to nondestructive testing of concrete. United States: Federal Highway Administration.
7. Creasey, R., et al. (2017). Long-term 20-year performance of surface coating repairs applied to façades of reinforced concrete buildings. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 7, 348–360.10.1016/j.cscm.2017.11.001 ↗
8. Galvão, J., et al. (2018). Variability of in-situ testing on rendered walls in natural ageing conditions–Rebound hammer and ultrasound techniques. Construction and Building Materials, 170, 167–181.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.152 ↗
9. Garnier, V., et al. Non destructive testing of concrete: transfer from laboratory to on-site measurement. 2014.
10. Hamidian, M., et al. (2012). Application of Schmidt rebound hammer and ultrasonic pulse velocity techniques for structural health monitoring. Scientific Research and Essays, 7(21), 1997–2001.
11. Hannachi, S. and M.N. Guetteche. Review of the rebound hammer method estimating concrete compressive strength on site. 2014.
12. Helal, J., Sofi, M., & Mendis, P. (2015). Non-destructive testing of concrete: A review of methods. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 14(1), 97–105.10.56748/ejse.141931 ↗
13. Hoła, J., & Schabowicz, K. (2005). New technique of nondestructive assessment of concrete strength using artificial intelligence. NDT & E International, 38(4), 251–259.10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.08.002 ↗
14. Hong, S., et al. (2020). Evaluation of condition of concrete structures using ultrasonic pulse velocity method. Applied Sciences, 10(2), 706.10.3390/app10020706 ↗
15. Imam, A., Salami, B. A., & Oyehan, T. A. (2021). Predicting the compressive strength of a quaternary blend concrete using Bayesian regularized neural network. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 6(4), 237–246.10.1080/24705314.2021.1892572 ↗
16. Ishigami, A., et al. (2018). Concrete facility function diagnosis method corresponding to deterioration characteristics in cold regions. Journal of the Society of Agricultural and Rural Engineering in Japan, 86(6), 509–512.
17. Ju, M., Park, K., & Oh, H. (2017). Estimation of compressive strength of high strength concrete using non-destructive technique and concrete core strength. Applied Sciences, 7(12), 1249.10.3390/app7121249 ↗
18. Kumar, K. H., Babu, N. V., & Lingeshwaran, N. (2021). A study on repair of concrete structure using non destructive tests. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 5439–5446.
19. Kumar, S., & Rai, B. (2019). Pulse velocity–strength and elasticity relationship of high volume fly ash induced self-compacting concrete. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 4(4), 216–229.10.1080/24705314.2019.1657615 ↗
20. Kwon, S.H., Lee, J.S., & Kim, H.K. (2024). On determination protocols of characteristic in-situ compressive strength of concrete for existing structure: Case study with core samples from actual bridges. Case Studies in Construction Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0303110.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03031 ↗
21. Lee, K., et al. (2021). Field experiment on a PSC-I bridge for convolutional autoencoder-based damage detection. Structural Health Monitoring, 20(4), 1627–1643.10.1177/1475921720926267 ↗
22. Liu, J.-C., Sue, M.-L., & Kou, C.-H. (2009). Estimating the strength of concrete using surface rebound value and design parameters of concrete material. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 12(1), 1–7.
23. Mahmoudipour, M. Statistical case study on Schmidt hammer, ultrasonic and core compression strength tests’ results performed on cores obtained from Behbahan cement factory in Iran. 5th International Workshop of NDT Experts. 2009.
24. Maierhofer, C. (2010). Planning a non-destructive test programme for reinforced concrete structures. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1533/9781845699604.1.3 ↗
25. Malhotra, V. M., & Carino, N. J. (2003). Handbook on nondestructive testing of concrete. Florida: CRC Press.10.1201/9781420040050 ↗
26. Martín-del-Rio, J. J., Canivell, J., & Falcon, R. M. (2020). The use of non-destructive testing to evaluate the compressive strength of a lime-stabilised rammed-earth wall: Rebound index and ultrasonic pulse velocity. Construction and Building Materials, 242, 118060.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118060 ↗
27. No, T.C.S., Guidebook on non-destructive testing of concrete structures. Training Course Series, 2002.
28. Pfister, V., Tundo, A., & Luprano, V. A. (2014). Evaluation of concrete strength by means of ultrasonic waves: A method for the selection of coring position. Construction and Building Materials, 61, 278–284.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.017 ↗
29. Pucinotti, R. (2015). Reinforced concrete structure: Non destructive in situ strength assessment of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 75, 331–341.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.023 ↗
30. Revilla-Cuesta, V., et al. (2022). Hammer rebound index as an overall-mechanical-quality indicator of self-compacting concrete containing recycled concrete aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 347, 128549.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128549 ↗
31. Saint-Pierre, F., et al. (2016). Concrete quality designation based on ultrasonic pulse velocity. Construction and Building Materials, 125, 1022–1027.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.158 ↗
32. Saleh, E., et al. (2022). Guide to non-destructive concrete strength assessment: Homogeneity tests and sampling plans. Journal of Building Engineering, 49, 104047.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104047 ↗
33. Samia, H. and G. Mohamed Nacer, Application of the combined method for evaluating the compressive strength of concrete on site. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012. 2012.
34. Shah, M. U., et al. (2023). Diagnosis of durability-related problems in concrete structures through comprehensive analysis and non-destructive testing: A case study. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 8(4), 260–270.10.1080/24705314.2023.2233812 ↗
35. Shariq, M., Prasad, J., & Masood, A. (2013). Studies in ultrasonic pulse velocity of concrete containing GGBFS. Construction and Building Materials, 40, 944–950.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.070 ↗
36. Sharma, K. K., et al. (2020). Compressive strength modeling of blended concrete based on empirical and artificial neural network techniques. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 5(4), 252–264.10.1080/24705314.2020.1783120 ↗
37. Soutsos, M. N., et al. (2012). Estimation of on-site compressive strength of concrete. In D. Breysse (Ed.), Non-Destructive Assessment of Concrete Structures: Reliability and Limits of Single and Combined Techniques: State-of-the-Art Report of the RILEM Technical Committee (pp. 119–186). Dordrecht p: Springer, Netherlands.