Effects of Vibration-Reducible Cementitious Materials on the Acoustic and Structural Responses of Buildings Adjacent to Urban Railway Systems: A Numerical Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Some studies have developed different kinds of vibration-reducible construction materials. However, no existing study has applied these materials in a building to prove their effectiveness at a structural level. Besides, much of the related research has focused only on measuring sound pressure or vibration levels within buildings adjacent to railway systems. Although some studies have provided methods to predict the vibration of a building structure, they cannot determine the train-induced sound pressure level simultaneously. Therefore, this study used the finite element model to simulate an existing building structure to prove the effectiveness of this method. Based on the combination of the acoustic and solid interaction modules in the finite element analysis method, the vibration and sound levels of buildings based on different kinds of vibration-reducible cementitious materials were estimated using different models. The results show that vibration-reducible cementitious materials can reduce vibration velocity and sound pressure levels by up to 7.1 dB and 5.2 dB with an increased floor height, respectively. In addition, reduced vibration can decrease structure-borne noise by up to 2.9 dB. A further parametric study shows that cementitious materials with a relatively high elastic modulus, a high damping loss factor, and low density can be effective for vibration and sound reduction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed, L. (2018). Dynamic measurements for determining poisson’s ratio of young concrete. Nordic Concrete Research, 58(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.2478/ncr-2018-000610.2478/ncr-2018-0006 ↗
2. AmirKaynia, B. M., Madshus, C., & Zackrisson, P. (2000). Ground vibration from high-speed trains: prediction and countermeasure. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126(6), 531–537.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:6(531) ↗
3. Anson, M., & Newman, K. (1966). The effect of mix proportions and method of testing on Poisson’s ratio for mortars and concretes. Magazine of Concrete Research, 18(56), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1966.18.56.11510.1680/macr.1966.18.56.115 ↗
4. ASTM C469-02, Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0469-02E01.10.1520/C0469-02E01 ↗
5. ASTM C215-19, Standard test method for fundamental transverse, longitudinal, and torsional resonant frequencies of concrete specimens, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1520/C0215-19.10.1520/C0215-19 ↗
6. Auersch, L. (2005). The excitation of ground vibration by rail traffic: Theory of vehicle-track-soil interaction and measurements on high-speed lines. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 284(1–2), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.06.01710.1016/j.jsv.2004.06.017 ↗
7. Bolin, K., Bluhm, G., Eriksson, G., & Nilsson, M. E. (2011). Infrasound and low frequency noise from wind turbines: Exposure and health effects. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/03510310.1088/1748-9326/6/3/035103 ↗
8. Čáp, I., Čápová, K., Smetana, M., & Borik, Š. (2021). Mechanical waves. In I. Čáp, K. Čápová, M. Smetana, & Š Borik (Eds.), Electromagnetic and acoustic waves in bioengineering applications. Rijeka: IntechOpen. 10.5772/intechopen.101651.10.5772/intechopen.90379 ↗
9. Chandra, R., Singh, S. P., & Gupta, K. (2003). A study of damping in fiber-reinforced composites. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 262(3), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00107-X10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00107-X ↗
10. L. Chi, S. Lu, & Y. Yao. (2019). Damping additives used in cement-matrix composites: A review, Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 164. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.057.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.057 ↗
11. K. H. Chua, K. W. Lo, & T. Balendra. (1995). Building response due to subway train traffic.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:11(747) ↗
12. COMSOL. (1998). Acoustics Module User’s Guide. [Online]. Retrieved from www.comsol.com/blogs
13. COMSOL. (2022). Introduction to COMSOL Multiphysics. [Online]. Retrieved from www.comsol.com/blogs
14. Connolly, D., Giannopoulos, A., & Forde, M. C. (2013). Numerical modelling of ground borne vibrations from high speed rail lines on embankments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 46, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.12.00310.1016/j.soildyn.2012.12.003 ↗
15. Connolly, D. P., Kouroussis, G., Woodward, P. K., Giannopoulos, A., Verlinden, O., & Forde, M. C. (2014). Scoping prediction of re-radiated ground-borne noise and vibration near high speed rail lines with variable soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 66, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.02110.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.021 ↗
16. Fiala, P., Degrande, G., & Augusztinovicz, F. (2007). Numerical modelling of ground-borne noise and vibration in buildings due to surface rail traffic. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 301(3–5), 718–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.10.01910.1016/j.jsv.2006.10.019 ↗
17. Fu, Q., & Wu, Y. (2019). Three-dimensional finite element modelling and dynamic response analysis of track-embankment-ground system subjected to high-speed train moving loads. Geomechanics and Engineering, 19(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.19.3.24110.12989/gae.2019.19.3.241 ↗
18. Heckl, M., Hauck, G., & Wettschureck, R. (1996). Structure-borne sound and vibration from rail traffic. Journal of Sound and Vibration. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.025710.1006/jsvi.1996.0257 ↗
19. D. E. Hudson. (1995). Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, by Anil K. Chopra, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995. No. of pages: xxviii + 761, ISBN 0-13-855214-2, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 24, 8, 1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240809.10.1002/eqe.4290240809 ↗
20. Hunt, H. E. M. (1991). Modelling of road vehicles for calculation of traffic-induced ground vibration as a random process. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 144, 41–51.10.1016/0022-460X(91)90731-X ↗
21. Hunt, H. E. M. (1996). Modelling of rail vehicles and track for calculation of ground-vibration transmission into buildings. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 193(1), 185–194.10.1006/jsvi.1996.0258 ↗
22. Kouroussis, G., Van Parys, L., Conti, C., & Verlinden, O. (2014). Using three-dimensional finite element analysis in time domain to model railway-induced ground vibrations. Advances in Engineering Software, 70, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.01.00510.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.01.005 ↗
23. Kouroussis, G., & Verlinden, O. (2013). Prediction of railway induced ground vibration through multibody and finite element modelling. Mechanical Sciences, 4(1), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-4-167-201310.5194/ms-4-167-2013 ↗
24. Kouroussis, G., Yang Zhu, S., & Vogiatzis, K. (2021). Noise and vibration from transportation. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A20NVT0110.1631/jzus.A20NVT01 ↗
25. Li, W. W., Ji, W. M., Liu, Y., Xing, F., & Liu, Y. K. (2015). Damping property of a cement-based material containing carbon nanotube. Journal of Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/37140410.1155/2015/371404 ↗
26. Liang, C., Xiao, J., Wang, Y., Wang, C., & Mei, S. (2021). Relationship between internal viscous damping and stiffness of concrete material and structure. Structural Concrete, 22(3), 1410–1428. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.20200062810.1002/suco.202000628 ↗
27. Lopes, P., Costa, P. A., Ferraz, M., Calçada, R., & Cardoso, A. S. (2014). Numerical modeling of vibrations induced by railway traffic in tunnels: From the source to the nearby buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 61–62, 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.02.01310.1016/j.soildyn.2014.02.013 ↗
28. Maclachlan, L., Ögren, M., van Kempen, E., Hussain-Alkhateeb, L., & Waye, K. P. (2018). Annoyance in response to vibrations from railways. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1509188710.3390/ijerph15091887 ↗
29. E. K. W. Ngai and C. F. Ng. (2000). Correlation of structure-borne noise and vibration along railway viaduct, In: The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering, 2000.
30. Ngai, K. W., & Ng, C. F. (2003). Structure-borne noise and vibration of concrete box structure and rail viaduct. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 255(2), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.415510.1006/jsvi.2001.4155 ↗
31. Y. Okumura and K. Kuno. (1991). Statistical analysis of field data of railway noise and vibration collected in an urban area.10.1016/0003-682X(91)90017-9 ↗
32. Persson, P., Persson, K., & Sandberg, G. (2016). Numerical study on reducing building vibrations by foundation improvement. Engineering Structures, 124, 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.02010.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.020 ↗
33. Qiu, J., Qin, Y., Feng, Z., Wang, L., & Wang, K. (2020). Safety risks and protection measures for city wall during construction and operation of Xi’an metro. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.000137410.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001374 ↗
34. Romero, A., Galvin, P., & Dominguez, J. (2012). A time domain analysis of train induced vibrations. Earthquakes and Structures. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.3_4.29710.12989/eas.2012.3.3_4.297 ↗
35. Sharma, N., Mahapatra, T. R., Panda, S. K., & Mehar, K. (2018). Evaluation of vibroacoustic responses of laminated composite sandwich structure using higher-order finite-boundary element model. Steel and Composite Structures, 28(5), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.5.62910.12989/scs.2018.28.5.629 ↗
36. Sun, C., Gao, L., Hou, B., & Yizhen, W. (2017). Analysis of vibration characteristics and influence parameters of buildings adjacent to subway line. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 41(4), 23–30.
37. Verbraken, H., Lombaert, G., & Degrande, G. (2011). Verification of an empirical prediction method for railway induced vibrations by means of numerical simulations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 330(8), 1692–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.10.02610.1016/j.jsv.2010.10.026 ↗
38. Wang, Z., Dai, Q., & Guo, S. (2017). Laboratory performance evaluation of both flake graphite and exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet modified asphalt composites. Construction and Building Materials, 149, 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.05.10010.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.05.100 ↗
39. With, C., & Bodare, A. (2007). Prediction of train-induced vibrations inside buildings using transfer functions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.06.00310.1016/j.soildyn.2006.06.003 ↗
40. Wu, S., Moges, K. A., Vashistha, P., & Pyo, S. (2023). Sustainable cementitious composites with 30% porosity and a compressive strength of 30 MPa. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 25, 5494–5505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.03610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.036 ↗
41. Wu, S., Park, S., & Pyo, S. (2022). Effect of types of microparticles on vibration reducibility of cementitious composites. Materials, 15(14), 4821. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1514482110.3390/ma15144821 ↗
42. Wu, S., & Pyo, S. (2023). Micromechanical modeling of damping behavior in vibration-reducible cementitious composites. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13130510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131305 ↗
43. Zhai, W., et al. (2013). High-speed train–track–bridge dynamic interactions–Part I: Theoretical model and numerical simulation. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 1(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2013.79149810.1080/23248378.2013.791498 ↗
44. Zhai, W., Wang, K., & Cai, C. (2009). Fundamentals of vehicle-track coupled dynamics. Vehicle System Dynamics, 47(11), 1349–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042311080262156110.1080/00423110802621561 ↗
45. Zheng, L., Sharon Huo, X., & Yuan, Y. (2008). Experimental investigation on dynamic properties of rubberized concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 22(5), 939–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.005 ↗
46. Zhu, Q., Wang, H., & Spencer, B. F., Jr. (2023). Investigation on vibration behavior of a high-speed railway bridge based on monitoring data. Smart Structures and Systems, 31(6), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2023.31.6.58510.12989/sss.2023.31.6.585 ↗
47. Zou, C., Wang, Y., & Tao, Z. (2020). Train-induced building vibration and radiated noise by considering soil properties. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su1203093710.3390/su12030937 ↗
48. Zou, C., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Guo, J. (2015). Measurement of ground and nearby building vibration and noise induced by trains in a metro depot. Science of the Total Environment, 536, 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.12310.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.123 ↗