Process for Integrating Constructability into the Design Phase in High-Rise Concrete Buildings: Focused on Temporary Work
Source abstract
Abstract
With the increase in high-rise building construction, failure to consider constructability in the design phase can result in huge wastes in the construction phase, as well as losing opportunities for design improvement. However, existing approaches for reflecting constructability rely heavily on reviews, resulting in an inefficient decision-making process. Thus, by considering appropriate timing and detail levels when applying construction knowledge, this study proposes a process for integrating constructability activities related to temporary work into the design phase in high-rise concrete buildings. Through an investigation of information-dependency relationships, 22 constructability activities were linked with 33 design activities. Further, these activities’ implementation processes were constructed based on optimized information flows from a partitioned dependency structure matrix. The results of this study can help a project team address constructability issues at the appropriate time during the design process and will contribute to improving the efficiency of the overall project operation in high-rise building construction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: BIM and Construction Integration · Design Education and Practice · Product Development and Customization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahn, H. K., Ham, N. H., Kim, J. H., & Kim, J. J. (2013). A study on improvement of implementation documents using DSM (Dependency Structure Matrix). Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 29(3), 173–181.
2. Bae, J. I., Shin, J. W., & Kwon, O. K. (2006). A suggestion for design process improvement to develop a design management model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 7(6), 90–98.
3. Browning, T. R. (2001). Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3), 292–306.10.1109/17.946528 ↗
4. Construction Industry Guide (CII). (1993). Constructability implementation guide. CII Publication 34-1, Austin, Tex.
5. Design Structure Matrix (DSM). Retrieved March 15, 2018, from http://www.dsmweb.org .
6. Fisher, D. J., Anderson, S. D., & Rahman, S. P. (2000). Integration constructability tools into constructability review process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(2), 89–96.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:2(89) ↗
7. Fischer, M., & Tatum, C. B. (1997). Characteristic of design-relevant constructability knowledge. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(3), 253–260.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:3(253) ↗
8. Griffith, A., & Sidwell, A. C. (1995). Constructability in building and engineering projects (1st ed.). London: Palgrave HE UK.10.1007/978-1-349-13137-2 ↗
9. Kim, Y. S. (2005). Where does America’s design competitiveness come from? (1st ed.). Seoul: Bomoondang.
10. Kwon, D. H., & Kim, H. S. (2003). Analysis of constructability issues in high-rise office buildings. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 19(3), 155–162.
11. Kwon, S. H., Jang, K. P., Kim J. H., & Shah, S. P. (2016). State of the art on prediction of concrete pumping. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 10(3 Supplement), S75–S85.10.1007/s40069-016-0150-y ↗
12. Lam, P. T. I., Wong, F. W. H., & Chan, A. P. C. (2006). Contributions of designers to improving buildability and constructability. Design Studies, 27(4), 457–479.10.1016/j.destud.2005.10.003 ↗
13. Lee, J. W., Cho, K., & Kim, T. (2017a). Identifying construction engineering tasks at the design phase for enhancing constructability in high-rise building construction: Focused on temporary work. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 17(5), 453–463.10.5345/JKIBC.2017.17.5.453 ↗
14. Lee, J. W., Cho, K., & Kim, T. (2017b). Preliminary study on design process by reflecting construction engineering tasks. In Proceedings of KICEM Annual Conference, Seoul, Korea, 17–18 November 2017 (pp. 115–116).
15. Li, Z., Wang, L., & Ma, G. (2018). Method for the enhancement of buildability and bending resistance of 3D printable tailing mortar. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 12(1), 543–554.10.1186/s40069-018-0269-0 ↗
16. Motsa, N., Oladapo, A., & Othman, A. A. E. (2008). The benefits of using constructability during the design process. In Proceedings of the 5th Post Graduate Conference on Construction Industry Development, Bloemfontein, South Africa, 16–18 March 2008 (pp. 158–167).
17. O’Connor, J. T., & Miller, S. J. (1995). Overcoming barriers to successful constructability implementation efforts. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 9(2), 117–128.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1995)9:2(117) ↗
18. Oh, J. W., Song, K. R., & Ahn, Y. S. (2002). A study on the application of constructability in construction project process. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 18(12), 157–164.
19. Othman, A. A. E. (2011). Improving building performance through integrating constructability in the design process. Organization, Technology & Management in Construction: an International Journal, 3(2), 333–347.
20. Park, J. S., Hyun, C. T., Hong, T. H., Park, S. H., & Moon, H. S. (2009). Development of checklist for improving constructability in steel structure construction. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 25(12), 197–206.
21. Park, M. S., Cho, J. Y., Lee, H. S., Kwon, S. K., & Ahn, S. J. (2012). BIM design management process using the dependency structure matrix at the introduction phase. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 28(1), 37–45.
22. Park, M., Ham, Y., Lee, H. S., & Kim, W. Y. (2010). Development of design process management model using dependency structure matrix for constructability. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 11(5), 65–74.10.6106/KJCEM.2010.11.5.65 ↗
23. Poh, P. S. H., & Chen, J. (2010). The Singapore buildable design appraisal system: A preliminary review of the relationship between buildability, site productivity and cost. Construction Management & Economics, 16(6), 681–692.10.1080/014461998371971 ↗
24. Pulaski, M. H., & Horman, M. J. (2005). Organizing constructability knowledge for design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(8), 911–919.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:8(911) ↗
25. Shon, Y. J. (2013). Improving constructability of apartment building projects on design process innovation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Hanyang University of Seoul.
26. Steward, D. (1965). Partitioning and tearing systems of equations. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Series B: Numerical Analysis, 2(2), 345–365.10.1137/0702028 ↗
27. Steward, D. (1981). The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 28(3), 71–74.10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589 ↗
28. Yoon, H., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). Analysis of constructability factors affecting on the productivity of tall building construction: With focused on the area of steel work. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 15(4), 30–38.10.6106/KJCEM.2014.15.4.030 ↗