Experimental Evaluation of Shape Memory Alloy Retrofitting Effect for Circular Concrete Column Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The seismic performance of a concrete column retrofitted with an iron-based shape memory alloy (Fe-SMA) was evaluated under cyclic loading. In addition to structural behavior, internal damage was monitored using an ultrasonic pulse velocity test. The round shapes of three reinforced concrete (RC) columns were tested: a non-retrofitted RC column as a control, a carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) column, and an Fe-SMA retrofitted column. During the cyclic loading test, the degradation of the column was defined based on the decrease in compressional wave velocities. The experimental results demonstrated a maximum improvement of 175% in seismic performance of the Fe-SMA retrofitted RC column compared with the controlled column. This is primarily owing to the active constraints of the SMA, which were quantified based on ultrasonic velocities. Furthermore, the surface degradation process was identified using external cracks, which were not visible in the CFRP retrofitted RC column.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Akguzel, U., & Pampanin, S. (2012). Assessment and design procedure for the seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete beam-column joints using FRP composite materials. Journal of Composites for Construction, 16(1), 21–34.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000242 ↗
2. American Concrete Institute. (2014). Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary (ACI 374.1-05, Reapproved 2014) (pp. 1–9). Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
3. American Concrete Institute. (2017). Guide for the design construction of externally bonded frp systems for strengthening concrete structures (ACI 440.2R-2017). Farmington Hills, MI, USA: ACI.
4. Architectural Institute of Korea (2018), A study on the earthquake disaster prevention for earthquake vulnerable buildings including piloti-type buildings, AIK-R-2018–848, pp. 7–8
5. ASTM. (2016), Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete, ASTM C597–02. West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
6. California Department of Transportation. (2013). Seismic design criteria version 1.7. California Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
7. Chekroun, M., Le Marrec, L., Abraham, O., Durand, O., & Villain, G. (2009). Analysis of coherent surface wave dispersion and attenuation for non-destructive testing of concrete. Ultrasonics, 49(8), 743–751.10.1016/j.ultras.2009.05.006 ↗
8. Choi, E., Chung, Y. S., Choi, D. H., & DesRoches, R. (2012). Seismic protection of lap-spliced RC columns using SMA wire jackets. Magazine of Concrete Research, 64(3), 239–252.10.1680/macr.10.00181 ↗
9. Cladera, A., Weber, B., Leinenbach, C., Czaderski, C., Shahverdi, M., & Motavalli, M. (2014). Iron-based shape memory alloys for civil engineering structures: An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 63, 281–293.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.032 ↗
10. Czaderski, C., Shahverdi, M., Brönnimann, R., Leinenbach, C., & Motavalli, M. (2014). Feasibility of iron-based shape memory alloy strips for prestressed strengthening of concrete structures. Construction and Building Materials, 56, 94–105.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.069 ↗
11. Di Sarno, L., Elnashai, A. S., & Nethercot, D. A. (2006). Seismic retrofitting of framed structures with stainless steel. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62(1–2), 93–104.10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.05.007 ↗
12. Elnashai, A. S., & Di Sarno, L. (2008). Fundamentals of earthquake engineering10.1002/9780470024867 ↗
13. Hong, K., Lee, S., Han, S., & Yeon, Y. (2018a). Evaluation of Fe-based shape memory alloy (Fe-SMA) as strengthening material for reinforced concrete structures. Applied Sciences, 8(5), 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/app805073010.3390/app8050730 ↗
14. Hong, K., Lee, S., Yeon, Y., & Jung, K. (2018b). Flexural response of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with near-surface-mounted Fe-based shape-memory alloy strips. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0279-y10.1186/s40069-018-0279-y ↗
15. Hong, K., Yeon, Y., Shim, W., & Kim, D. (2020). Recovery behavior of fe-based shape memory alloys under different restraints. Applied Sciences, 10(10), 3441.10.3390/app10103441 ↗
16. Janke, L., Czaderski, C., Motavalli, M., & Ruth, J. (2005). Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures—Overview, limits and new ideas. Materials and Structures, 38(5), 578–592.10.1007/BF02479550 ↗
17. Ji, S. W., Yeon, Y. M., & Hong, K. N. (2020). Compression behavior of concrete laterally confined by Fe-based shape memory alloy spiral reinforcement. Journal of the Korean Society for Advanced Composites Structures., 11(6), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.11004/kosacs.2020.11.6.06310.11004/kosacs.2020.11.6.063 ↗
18. Jung, D., Wilcoski, J., & Andrawes, B. (2018). Bidirectional shake table testing of RC columns retrofitted and repaired with shape memory alloy spirals. Engineering Structures, 160, 171–185.10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.046 ↗
19. Kim, S., Moon, T., & Kim, S. J. (2020). Effect of uncertainties in material and structural detailing on the seismic vulnerability of RC frames considering construction quality defects. Applied Sciences, 10(24), 8832.10.3390/app10248832 ↗
20. Ma, C. K., Apandi, N. M., Sofrie, C. S. Y., Ng, J. H., Lo, W. H., Awang, A. Z., & Omar, W. (2017). Repair and rehabilitation of concrete structures using confinement: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 133, 502–515.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.100 ↗
21. Naik, T., Malhotra, V., & Popovics, J. (2004). The ultrasonic pulse velocity method. In Handbook on nondestructive testing of concrete. CRC Press.
22. Ohdaira, E., & Masuzawa, N. (2000). Water content and its effect on ultrasound propagation in concrete—the possibility of NDE. Ultrasonics, 38(1–8), 546–552.10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00158-4 ↗
23. Rojob, H., & El-Hacha, R. (2017). Self-prestressing using iron-based shape memory alloy for flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal, 114(2), 523.10.14359/51689455 ↗
24. Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R., & Li, M. W. (1994). Strength and ductility of concrete columns externally reinforced with fiber composite straps. Structural Journal, 91(4), 434–447.
25. Saffar, S., & Abdullah, A. (2013). Longitudinal wave propagation in multi cylindrical viscoelastic matching layers of airborne ultrasonic transducer: New method to consider the matching layer’s diameter (frequency< 100 kHz). Ultrasonics, 53(6), 1174–1184.10.1016/j.ultras.2013.01.016 ↗
26. Seible, F., Priestley, M. N., Hegemier, G. A., & Innamorato, D. (1997). Seismic retrofit of RC columns with continuous carbon fiber jackets. Journal of Composites for Construction, 1(2), 52–62.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(52) ↗
27. Shahverdi, M., Czaderski, C., & Motavalli, M. (2016). Iron-based shape memory alloys for prestressed near-surface mounted strengthening of reinforced concrete beams. Construction and Building Materials, 112, 28–38.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.174 ↗
28. Shehata, I. A., Carneiro, L. A., & Shehata, L. C. (2002). Strength of short concrete columns confined with CFRP sheets. Materials and Structures, 35(1), 50–58.10.1007/BF02482090 ↗
29. Shin, M., & Andrawes, B. (2010). Experimental investigation of actively confined concrete using shape memory alloys. Engineering Structures, 32(3), 656–664.10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.012 ↗
30. Shin, M., & Andrawes, B. (2011). Lateral cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete columns retrofitted with shape memory spirals and FRP wraps. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(11), 1282–1290.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000364 ↗
31. Suhail, R., Amato, G., & McCrum, D. P. (2020). Active and passive confinement of shape modified low strength concrete columns using SMA and FRP systems. Composite Structures, 251, 112649.10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112649 ↗
32. Vahidpour, M., Kheyroddin, A., & Kioumarsi, M. (2022). Experimental Investigation on Flexural Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with 3D-Fiberglass, CFRP and GFRP. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 16(1), 1–20.10.1186/s40069-022-00508-w ↗
33. Xiao, Y., & Wu, H. (2003). Retrofit of reinforced concrete columns using partially stiffened steel jackets. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(6), 725–732.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:6(725) ↗
34. Yahiaoui, D., Saadi, M., & Bouzid, T. (2022). Compressive Behavior of Concrete Containing Glass Fibers and Confined with Glass FRP Composites. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 16(1), 1–19.10.1186/s40069-022-00525-9 ↗
35. Zerbe L, Reda M, Dawood M, Belarbi A, Senouci A, Gencturk B, Michel J. (2017). Behavior of retrofitted concrete members using iron-based shape memory alloys [Conference presentation]. Fourth Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures.
36. Zhao, J., Shen, F., Si, C., Sun, Y., & Yin, L. (2020). Experimental investigation on seismic resistance of RC shear walls with CFRP bars in boundary elements. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 14(1), 1–20.10.1186/s40069-019-0377-5 ↗