Slab Reinforcement Contributions to Negative Moment Strength of Reinforced Concrete T-Beam with High Strength Steel at Exterior Beam-Column Joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Previous studies have revealed that the contribution of slab reinforcement to the T-beam flexural strength in negative moment regions are not negligible for the seismic capacity design. An effective slab width (i.e., effective width of flanged section) has been proposed, within which the slab reinforcement needs to be included in the calculation of the beam nominal flexural strength in negative moment regions. These studies mainly focused on the cases using normal-strength steel in moment resisting frames. However, recently high-strength steel has been widely used in reinforced concrete moment resisting frames in high seismic regions to avoid congestion near beam-column joints. The use of high-strength steel may affect the beam stiffness due to the fact that it will require less amount of reinforcement, and result in a different normal stress distribution compared to the case with normal-strength steel. Therefore, this paper investigates the slab reinforcement contribution to the flexural strength of the reinforced concrete T-beam designed with high-strength steel in negative moment regions at exterior beam-column joints, for which nonlinear pushover analyses were conducted. Beam reinforcement grade was considered as a primary parameter with several other design variables including slab thickness, height, and span length of the beam. Analytical results show that the use of high-strength steel can result in a wider effective slab width than the case of normal-strength steel for calculating the beam nominal flexural strength under the negative moment. Based on these results, new design equations were proposed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS (2006) ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual (Version 6.6). Providence, RI: Dassault Systems SIMULIA Corporation.
2. ACI Committee 318 (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI318-19) and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
3. Alaee, P., & Li, B. (2017). High-strength concrete exterior beam-column joints with high-yield strength steel reinforcements. Engineering Structures, 145, 305–321.10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.024 ↗
4. Alavi-Dehkordi, S., Mostofinejad, D., & Alaee, P. (2019). Effects of high-strength reinforcing bars and concrete on seismic behavior of RC beam-column joints. Engineering Structures, 183, 702–719.10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.019 ↗
5. Aoyama, H. (2001). Design of modern highrise reinforced concrete structures (Vol. 3). UK: Imperial College Press.10.1142/p204 ↗
6. ASTM (2016a). Standard specification for low-alloy steel deformed and plain bars for concrete reinforcement, ASTM A706-16, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
7. ASTM (2016b). Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, ASTM A615-16, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania
8. Barbosa, A. R., Link, T., & Trejo, D. (2016). Seismic performance of high-strength steel RC bridge columns. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21(2), 04015044.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000769 ↗
9. British Standards Institution. (1996). Eurocode 8: Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. British Standards Institution.
10. Chang, B., Hutchinson, T., Wang, X., & Englekirk, R. (2014). Seismic performance of beam-column subassemblies with high-strength steel reinforcement. ACI Structural Journal, 111(6), 1329–1338.10.14359/51686997 ↗
11. Cheng, M. Y., Wibowo, L. S. B., Lequesne, R. D., & Lepage, A. (2016). Deformation capacity and strength of RC frame members with high-strength materials. James K. Wight: A Tribute for his Students and Colleagues (ACI Special Publication SP-311), 311, 6–1.
12. Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute (2016). High-Strength Reinforcing Bars. CRSI Technical Note ETN-M-8-16, Schaumburg, Illinois.
13. Durrani, A. J., & Zerbe, H. E. (1987). Seismic resistance of R/C exterior connections with floor slab. Journal of Structural Engineering, 113(8), 1850–1864.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:8(1850) ↗
14. El-Hacha, R., & Rizkalla, S. H. (2002). Fundamental material properties of MMFX steel rebars. Research Report: RD-02/04, North Carolina State University.
15. Huq, M. S. (2018). HSS bars in earthquake-resistant T-shaped concrete walls. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas].
16. Kotsovos, G. M., Vougioukas, E., & Kotsovos, M. D. (2013). Reducing steel congestion without violating seismic performance requirements. Structural Journal, 110(3), 427–436.
17. Li, Y., Cao, S., & Jing, D. (2018). Concrete columns reinforced with high-strength steel subjected to reversed cycle loading. ACI Structural Journal, 115(4).10.14359/51701296 ↗
18. Madias, J., Wright, M., Behr, O. G., & Valladares, V. (2017). Analysis of international standards on concrete reinforcing steel bar. AISTech 2017 Proceedings.10.5151/1516-392X-30263 ↗
19. Mamesh, Z. (2022). Investigation of slab reinforcement contribution to negative moment strength of reinforced concrete T-beam with high strength steel. Master Thesis, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
20. Moffatt, K. R., & Dowling, P. J. (1978). British shear lag rules for composite girders. Journal of the Structural Division, 104(7), 1123–1130.10.1061/JSDEAG.0004954 ↗
21. National Building Codes of Russia. (1997). SNiP 2.03.01-84 Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures. Printed in USA.
22. Ning, N., Qu, W., & Ma, Z. J. (2016). Design recommendations for achieving “strong column-weak beam” in RC frames. Engineering Structures, 126, 343–352.10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.053 ↗
23. NIST GCR 14-917-30 (2014). Use of high-strength reinforcement in earthquake-resistant concrete structures. NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce.
24. Panagiotou, M., Restrepo, J. I., Schoettler, M., & Kim, G. (2012). Nonlinear Cyclic Truss Model for Reinforced Concrete Walls. ACI Structural Journal, 109(2).10.14359/51683631 ↗
25. Pantazopoulou, S. J., Moehle, J. P., & Shahrooz, B. M. (1988). Simple analytical model for T-beams in flexure. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(7), 1507–1523.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:7(1507) ↗
26. Qi, C. H., Li, S., Sun, Y., et al. (2010). Effect of floor slabs on the mechanical properties of reinforced concrete frame structures. Journal of Catastrophology, 25(S0), 105–110.
27. Shahrooz, B. M., Miller R.A., Harries K.A., & Russel H.G. (2011). Design of concrete structures using HSS reinforcement (Vol. 679). Transportation Research Board.
28. Wang, M., Zhang, D., & Fu, J. (2016). Experimental evaluation of seismic response for reinforced concrete beam–column knee joints with irregular geometries. Advances in Structural Engineering, 19(12), 1889–1901.10.1177/1369433216649388 ↗
29. Zhen, S. J., Jiang, L. X., Zhang, W. P., et al. (2009). Experimental research and analysis of effective flange width of beam end section in cast-in-site concrete frames. Structural Engineers, 25(2), 134–140.
30. Zhang, D., Fleischman, R. B., Naito, C. J., & Ren, R. (2011). Experimental evaluation of pretopped precast diaphragm critical flexure joint under seismic demands. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(10), 1063–1074.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000352 ↗
31. Zhang, D., Fleischman, R., Naito, C. J., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Development of diaphragm connector elements for three-dimensional nonlinear dynamic analysis of precast concrete structures. Advances in Structural Engineering, 19(2), 187–202.10.1177/1369433215624319 ↗