Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Tensile Performance and Failure Process of a Modified Portland Cement
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A better understanding of the tensile performance and tensile failure mechanism of cement paste is significant in preventing rock reinforcement failure. Therefore, this paper aims to reveal the tensile performance and failure mechanism of a modified Portland cement: Stratabinder HS cement. To achieve this objective, the split tensile test was conducted on specimens followed by simulating the failure mechanism numerically. The results indicated that the water–cement rate significantly influenced the tensile performance of the cement paste. When the water–cement rate increased from 0.35 to 0.42, the tensile strength declined from 1.9 MPa to 1.5 MPa. It was also observed that vertical tensile failure constantly occurred regardless of the water–cement rate. During the testing process, tensile cracks and shear cracks occurred. The increasing rate in the number of specimen cracks was dependent on the tensile stress state. Before the tensile stress reached the peak, the crack quantity increased slightly. After the peak, the crack quantity increased dramatically. During the vertical loading process, horizontal tensile stress occurred in the specimen. This horizontal tensile stress zone showed a diamond shape. The higher the tensile stress is, the larger the area of the horizontal tensile stress zone. When the tensile strength was reached, horizontal tensile stress mainly concentrated at the vertical centre of the specimen. This finally led to tensile failure of the specimen. This paper indicated that the water–cement rate was the key factor in evaluating the tensile strength of the Stratabinder HS cement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Aili, A., & Maruyama, I. (2020). Review of several experimental methods for characterization of micro- and nano-scale pores in cement-based material. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-020-00431-y10.1186/s40069-020-00431-y ↗
2. Aziz, N., Majoor, D., & Mirzaghorbanali, A. (2017). Strength properties of grout for strata reinforcement. Procedia Engineering, 191(2017), 1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.29310.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.293 ↗
3. Bayindir, F., Akyil, M., & Bayindir, Y. Z. (2009). Effect of storage pH on compressive and diametral tensile strength of adhesive luting cements. Materials Research Innovations, 13(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1179/143307509X43567310.1179/143307509X435673 ↗
4. Bitouri, Y. E., Jamin, F., & Youssoufi, M. S. E. (2017). Tensile and shear bond strength between cement paste and aggregate subjected to high temperature. Materials and Structures, 50(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1105-810.1617/s11527-017-1105-8 ↗
5. Bybee, K. (2004). Analysis of tensile-strength test methods for oilfield cement. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 56(8), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.2118/0804-0062-JPT10.2118/0804-0062-JPT ↗
6. Chen, J., & Li, D. (2022). Numerical simulation of fully encapsulated rock bolts with a tri-linear constitutive relation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 120, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.10426510.1016/j.tust.2021.104265 ↗
7. Chen, X., Wu, S., & Zhou, J. (2013). Influence of porosity on compressive and tensile strength of cement mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 40, 869–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.07210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.072 ↗
8. Chen, Y., Zuo, J., Liu, D., & Wang, Z. (2019). Deformation failure characteristics of coal-rock combined body under uniaxial compression: Experimental and numerical investigations. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78, 3449–3464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1336-010.1007/s10064-018-1336-0 ↗
9. Chen, Y., Teng, J., Bin Sadiq, R. A., & Zhang, K. (2020). Experimental study of bolt-anchoring mechanism for bedded rock mass. International Journal of Geomechanics, 20(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000156110.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001561 ↗
10. Chen, J., Zhao, Y., Zhao, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, C., & Li, D. (2021). Analytic study on the force transfer of full encapsulating rockbolts subjected to tensile force. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 13(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1142/S175882512150097610.1142/S1758825121500976 ↗
11. Chen, J., Liu, P., Liu, L., Zeng, B., Zhao, H., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., & Li, D. (2022). Anchorage performance of a modified cable anchor subjected to different joint opening conditions. Construction and Building Materials, 336, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12755810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127558 ↗
12. Fedrigo, W., Núñez, W. P., López, M. A. C., Kleinert, T. R., & Ceratti, J. A. P. (2018). A study on the resilient modulus of cement-treated mixtures of RAP and aggregates using indirect tensile, triaxial and flexural tests. Construction and Building Materials, 171, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.11910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.119 ↗
13. Gu, C., Xu, J. Y., & Meng, B. X. (2019). Effect of saturation on mechanical behavior of cement mortar based on 8-type tensile test. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 267, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/267/2/02200310.1088/1755-1315/267/2/022003 ↗
14. Jung, S., Saraswathy, V., Karthik, S., Kathirvel, P., & Kwon, S.-J. (2018). Microstructure characteristics of fly ash concrete with rice husk ash and lime stone powder. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 12(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0257-410.1186/s40069-018-0257-4 ↗
15. Li, D., Masoumi, H., & Ming, C. (2021). A constitutive model for modified cable bolts exhibiting cone shaped failure mode. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 145, 104855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.10485510.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104855 ↗
16. Liu, P., Zhou, X., Qian, Q., Berto, F., & Zhou, L. (2019). Dynamic splitting tensile properties of concrete and cement mortar. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 43(4), 757–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1316210.1111/ffe.13162 ↗
17. Masoud, G., Ali, B., & Mostafa, K. (2010). Residual mechanical properties of high-strength concretes after exposure to elevated temperatures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2010)22:1(59)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2010)22:1(59) ↗
18. Mishra, P. K., & Kantharia, M. (2021). Tensile strength investigation of cement mortar using Nano zinc oxide (ZnO). Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 7178–7180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.40210.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.402 ↗
19. Murmu, M., & Singh, S. P. (2014). Hydration products, morphology and microstructure of activated slag cement. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 8(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-013-0056-x10.1007/s40069-013-0056-x ↗
20. Němeček, J., Králíka, V., Šmilauera, V., Polívkab, L., & Jägerb, A. (2016). Tensile strength of hydrated cement paste phases assessed by micro-bending tests and nanoindentation. Cement and Concrete Composites, 73, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.07.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.07.010 ↗
21. Paknahad, A., Kucko, N. W., Leeuwenburgh, S. C. G., & Sluys, L. J. (2020). Experimental and numerical analysis on bending and tensile failure behavior of calcium phosphate cements. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 103, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.10356510.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103565 ↗
22. Rashad, A. M., Seleem, H.E.-D.H., & Shaheen, A. F. (2014). Effect of Silica Fume and Slag on Compressive Strength and Abrasion Resistance of HVFA Concrete. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 8(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-013-0051-210.1007/s40069-013-0051-2 ↗
23. Şahin, H. G., Biricik, Ö., & Mardani-Aghabaglou, A. (2022). Polycarboxylate-based water reducing admixture - clay compatibility; literature review. Journal of Polymer Research, 29(33), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02884-510.1007/s10965-021-02884-5 ↗
24. Silvestro, L., & Gleize, P. J. P. (2020). Effect of carbon nanotubes on compressive, flexural and tensile strengths of Portland cement-based materials: A systematic literature review. Construction and Building Materials, 264, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12023710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120237 ↗
25. Skrzypkowski, K. (2021). An experimental investigation into the stress-strain characteristic under static and quasi-static loading for partially embedded rock bolts. Energies, 14(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1405148310.3390/en14051483 ↗
26. Song, Z., & Zhang, J. (2022). Research on the progressive failure process and fracture mechanism of rocks with the structural evolution perspective. Journal of Structural Geology, 154, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2021.10448410.1016/j.jsg.2021.104484 ↗
27. Sun, W., & Wu, S. (2021). A study of crack initiation and source mechanism in the Brazilian test based on moment tensor. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 246, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10762210.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107622 ↗
28. Syarif, M., Sampebulu, V., & Tjaronge, M. W. (2018). Characteristic of compressive and tensile strength using the organic cement compare with portland cement. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e0017210.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00172 ↗
29. Wang, S., Chen, F., Xue, Q., & Zhang, P. (2020). Splitting tensile strength of cement soil reinforced with basalt fibers. Materials, 13(14), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1314311010.3390/ma13143110 ↗
30. Wang, Z., Wang, T., Wu, S., & Hao, Y. (2021). Investigation of microcracking behaviors in brittle rock using polygonal grain-based distinct method. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 45(13), 1871–1899. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.324610.1002/nag.3246 ↗
31. Wu, S., Chen, H., Ramandi, F. L., Hagan, P. C., Hebblewhite, B., Crosky, A., & Saydam, S. (2018). Investigation of cable bolts for stress corrosion cracking failure. Construction and Building Materials, 187, 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.066 ↗
32. Wu, S., Ramandi, H. L., Chen, H., Crosky, A., Hagan, P. C., & Saydam, S. (2019). Mineralogically influenced stress corrosion cracking of rockbolts and cable bolts in underground mines. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 119, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.04.01110.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.04.011 ↗
33. Xiong, L., & Geng, D. (2020). Scale effect of cement mortar specimens subjected to high temperatures using uniaxial compressive and splitting tensile tests. Archives of Civil Engineering, LXVI(3), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2020.13438910.24425/ace.2020.134389 ↗
34. Chen, J., Hagan, P. C., & Saydam, S. (2014). Mechanical properties of cementitious grout serving in fully grouted cable bolting systems. AusRock 2014: Third Australasian ground control in mining conference, Sydney, Australia, pp. 269–275.
35. Hyett, A. J., Bawden, W. F., & Coulson, A. L. (1992). Physical and mechanical properties of normal Portland cement pertaining to fully grouted cable bolts. In: Proceedings of the International symposium on rock support, Sudbury, Canada, pp. 341–348.
36. Rocha, V. V., & Ludvig, P. (2017). Characterization of Portland cement composites prepared by a dispersion of carbon nanotubes on cement particles. In: 12th central european congress on concrete engineering, Tokaj, Hungary, pp. 195–201.