Seismic Performance of Special Structural Walls Using Overlapping Hoops Instead of Closed Hoops
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study repeated cyclic loading tests were carried out on seven shear wall specimens, which were fabricated in a real scale. The purpose of these experiments is to investigate the difference on the seismic performance of the wall depending on two methods of confining longitudinal bars at the wall boundaries and propose relaxed bar arrangement details that could be used in a moderate to high seismicity zone. The results showed that the seismic performance of special shear walls using overlapping loops as transverse reinforcement of the boundary element was similar to that of special shear walls using a closed hoop in strength, stiffness, and energy dissipation. This means the former can serve as an alternative for rational seismic design for moderate to high seismicity zones using overlapping hoops.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 318. (2014). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14) and commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
2. ACI Innovation Task Group 1 and Collaborators. (2001). Acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural testing (ACI ITG/T1.1-01) and commentary (ACI ITG/T1.1R-01). Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
3. Applied Technology Council. (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC-40). Redwood City: Applied Technology Council.
4. Architectural Institute of Japan. (2010). AIJ standard for structural calculation of reinforced concrete structures. Tokyo: Architectural Institute of Japan.
5. Architectural Institute of Korea. (2011). Seismic performance evaluation of shear wall structural system with relaxed reinforcement details. Seoul: Architectural Institute of Korea.
6. Architectural Institute of Korea. (2013). Experimental study for revising provisions for special structural walls. Seoul: Architectural Institute of Korea.
7. Architectural Institute of Korea. (2016). Korean building code-structure: KBCS. Seoul: Architectural Institute of Korea.
8. ASCE. (2006). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 41-06. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers.
9. British Standards Institution. (2004). European Standard EN 1998-1:2004: Eurocode8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. London: British Standards Institution.
10. Chun, Y.-S., Kim, S.-Y., & Lee, W.-C. (2011). Development of relaxed reinforcement detail for special structural wall to mitigate height restrictions. Daejeon: Land and Housing Institute.
11. Chun, Y.-S., Lee, K.-H., Lee, H.-W., Park, Y.-E., & Song, J.-K. (2013). Seismic performance of special shear wall structural system with effectively reduced reinforcement detail. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 25(3), 271–281.10.4334/JKCI.2013.25.3.271 ↗
12. Computers and Structures, Inc. (2006). PERFORM-3D; Nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3D structures. Berkeley, CA: Computers and Structures Inc.
13. Korea Concrete Institute. (2015). Experimental study for nonlinear model calibration of structural wall and coupling beam. Seoul: Korea Concrete Institute.
14. Song, J.-W. (2017). Seismic performance of special shear wall with special boundary elements confined by U bar and cross tie. Gwangju: Chonnam National University Publisher.