journal article·2022-12Open access

Effect of the Cement-to-Water Ratio and Fractal Granular Model on the Prediction of Concretes Compressive Strength

Mhammed Abdeldjalil, Kaddour Chouicha

Abstract

Abstract The main objective of this work was to highlight the contribution of cement-to-water $$\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{W}$$ ratio and the fractal dimension $$\mathrm{FD}$$ model to the prediction of the compressive strength of concrete. In particular, the fractal dimension $$\mathrm{FD}$$ concept relative to the size distribution of the granular mixtures provided an insight into the fineness and compactness of the granular mixtures. The unconventional fractal granular model $${\mathrm{FGM}}_{\mathrm{g}}$$ also effectively contributed to highlight the correlation between cement-to-water ratio and compressive strength $${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{C}28}$$ of concretes. Initially, 99 granular mixtures of concretes composition available in literature were investigated and for which the granular distributions by means of the fractal dimension $$\mathrm{FD}$$ model and the granular range $$\mathrm{D}/\mathrm{d}$$ were we determined. Then, 36 concrete mixtures endowed with different granular mixtures were elaborated and analysed. These enabled to validate and evaluate the reliability of the basic granular fractal model $${\mathrm{FGM}}_{\mathrm{g}}$$ and the influence of cement–water $$\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{W}$$ ratio of concretes mixtures when predicting the concretes compressive strength $${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{C}28}.$$ The analytical model provided a close correlation with the experimental values of the compressive strength $${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{C}28}$$ of all the concretes. The correlation highlighted the relevance of including fractal granular model $${\mathrm{FGM}}_{\mathrm{g}}$$ that denoted the skeleton of the concretes and the cement–water $$\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{W}$$ ratio that referred to the binders into concretes mixtures when predicting $${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{C}28}$$. The theoretical approach whose effectiveness was highlighted using a "limited" number of real case studies may pave the way for further studies, when selecting the two key-factors for the prediction of concretes compressive strength $${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{C}28}$$.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Abdeldjalil, M., & Yousfi, S. (2020). Identification of sands of dune and concretes using a granular model—case of arid region. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 13, e00458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e0045810.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00458 ↗
2. Abrams, AD. (1918). Design of concrete mixtures. Bulletin No. 1, Structural Materials Research. Laboratory, Lewis Institute
3. AFNOR NF EN 197–1. (2012). Ciment - Partie 1 : Composition, spécifications et critères de conformité des ciments courants. Avril 2012
4. AFNOR NF EN 206 + A1 (2016). Classification index November concrete - Specification, performance, production and conformity. P 18–325, ICS: 91.080.40; 91,100.30 AFNOR Paris
5. Benouis, A., & Grini, A. (2011). Effect of concrete mixtures on estimation of porosity by ultrasonic velocity. In O. Güneş & Y. Akkaya (Eds.), Nondestructive testing of materials and structures, RILEM Bookseries (Vol. 6). Springer, Dordrecht, ISBN 978-94-007-0722-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0723-8_4410.1007/978-94-007-0723-8_44 ↗
6. Benouis, A., & Mehamdia, A. (2018). The use of ultrasonic pulse velocity to estimate the water permeability of concretes. MATEC Web of Conferences, 149, 01065. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20181490106510.1051/matecconf/201814901065 ↗
7. Bolomey, J. (1936). Granulation et prévision de la résistance probable des bétons, Bulletin technique de la Suisse romand, 7, No. 62, 73–78. [viewed on 2016]. https://www.shf-lhb.org/fr/articles/lhb/pdf/1936/04/lhb1936017.pdf.
8. Boukli, H.M.A., Ghomari, F., Khelidj, A. (2009). Compressive strengths of concrete formulated with algerian local materials. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 3, 103-117. [March 29, 2019]. https://jjce.just.edu.jo/issues/paper.php?p=75.pdf.
9. Boukli, H. M. A., Ghomari, F., & Khelidj, A. (2014). Probabilistic modelling of compressive strength of concrete using response surface methodology and neural networks. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39(6), 4451–4460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1139-y10.1007/s13369-014-1139-y ↗
10. Boutiba, A., Chaid, R., Laurent, M.L., Jauberthie, R. (2014). Effect of sulfur aggregates on mechanical resistance and durability for SFRHPC with the addition of slag, MATEC Web of Conferences. 11 03005 CC BY 4.0. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/2014110300510.1051/matecconf/20141103005 ↗
11. Chidiac, S. E., Moutassem, F., & Mahmoodzadeh, F. (2013). Compressive strength model for concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research., 65(9), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.12.0016710.1680/macr.12.00167 ↗
12. Chouicha, K. (2006). La dimension fractale et l’étendue granulaire comme paramètres d’identification des mélanges granulaires. Materials and Structures., 39, 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9113-010.1617/s11527-006-9113-0 ↗
13. Dan, L., Ditao, N., Qiang, F., & Daming, L. (2020). Fractal characteristics of pore structure of hybrid basalt–polypropylene fibre-reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites., 109, 103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10355510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103555 ↗
14. Derabla, R., & Benmalek, M. L. (2014). Characterization of heat-treated self-compacting concrete containing mineral admixtures at early age and in the long term. Construction and Building Materials., 66, 787–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.02910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.029 ↗
15. Di, Z., Weidong, S., Jianxin, F., Gaili, X., Jiajian, L., & Shuai, C. (2020). Research on mechanical characteristics, fractal dimension and internal structure of fiber reinforced concrete under uniaxial compression. Construction and Building Materials., 258(20), 120351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12035110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120351 ↗
16. Féret, R. (1892). Sur la compacité des mortiers hydrauliques. Ann. Ponts et Chaussées, Mém. Doc. Série 7,4 (2), 5–164
17. Guemmadi, Z., Resheidat, M., Chabil, H. and Toumi, B. (2009). [viewed on 2016] “Modeling the influence of limestone filler on concrete: a novel approach for strength and cost”, Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 3(2), 158–171. [viewed on 2016]. https://jjce.just.edu.jo/issues/paper.php?p=79.pdf
18. American Concrete Institute ACI 211.1–91 (1991). Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight and mass concrete. Farmington Hills Michigan
19. De Larrard, F. (2000). Structures granulaires et formulation des bétons. LCPC Nantes.
20. Lecomte, A., & Thomas, A. (1992). Caractère fractal des mélanges granulaires pour bétons de haute compacité. Materials and Structures, 25(5), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0247266610.1007/BF02472666 ↗
21. Mehamdia A., Benouis A. (2018). Influence of the size and frequency of contact transducers on the determination of concrete permeability by ultrasonic velocity and attenuation. Journal of Materials and Environmental Sciences, 9(3), pp 730–740.
22. Mennaai, A. (2008). Contribution à l’étude rhéologique d’un béton à hautes performances (BHP) local. Université de Skikda.
23. Moutassem, F., & Chidiac, S. E. (2016). Assessment of concrete compressive strength prediction models. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(1), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0722-410.1007/s12205-015-0722-4 ↗
24. Peng, Z., Zhen, G., Yan, S., Yuqiang, L., & Jiazheng, L. (2020). Effect of large broken stone content on properties of roller compacted concrete based on fractal theory. Construction and Building Materials, 30, 120821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12082110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120821 ↗
25. Qing, L., Qingli, Q., Jun, Z., Jiyang, W., & Qiang, Z. (2019). Fractal dimension of concrete incorporating silica fume and its correlations to pore structure, strength and permeability. Construction and Building Materials, 228(20), 116986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11698610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116986 ↗
26. Rezaie, A., Mauron, A. J. P., & Beyer, K. (2020). Sensitivity analysis of fractal dimensions of crack maps on concrete and masonry walls. Automation in Construction, 117, 103258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10325810.1016/j.autcon.2020.103258 ↗
27. Rouibi, M., & Chouicha, K. (2021). Porosity assessment of granular mixtures intended for concrete using the fractal model of particle-size distribution. Construction and Building Materials, 293, 123492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12349210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123492 ↗
28. Saadani, S. (2000). Comportement des bétons à base de granulats recyclent. Université de Constantine.
29. Sebsadji, S. K., & Chouicha, K. (2012). Determining periodic representative volumes of concrete mixtures based on the fractal analysis. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 49, 2941–2950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.01710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.017 ↗
30. Turcotte, D.L. (1997). Fractales et chaos en géologie et géophysique. University Press, Cambridge. ISBN-13 978 0521567336. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978113917469510.1017/CBO9781139174695 ↗
31. Xuang, Y., & Mingzhi, W. (2021). Fractal dimension analysis of aggregate packing process: A numerical case study on concrete simulation. Construction and Building Materials, 270(8), 121376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12137610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121376 ↗
32. Yves Petit, J., Wirquin, E., & Helnan-Moussa, B. (2011). Effect of W/C and superplasticizer type on rheological parameters of SCC repair mortar for gravitational or light pressure injection. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33, 1050–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.07.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.07.002 ↗