An Accurate Numerical Model Simulating Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns Irrespective of Types of Loading Protocols
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In older reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, columns are fragile elements that can induce collapse of entire buildings during earthquakes. An accurate assessment of the seismic vulnerability of RC buildings using nonlinear response history analyses requires an accurate numerical model. The peak-oriented hysteretic rule is often used in existing numerical models to simulate the hysteretic behavior of RC members, with predefined backbone curves and cyclic deterioration. A monotonic backbone curve is commonly constructed from a cyclic envelope. Because cyclic envelope varies according to loading protocols, particularly in a softening branch, it is difficult to obtain a unique backbone curve irrespective of loading protocols. In addition, cyclic deterioration parameters irrespective of loading protocols cannot be found because these parameters are estimated with respect to the backbone curves. Modeling parameters of existing numerical models can also vary with respect to loading protocol. The objective of this study is to propose a loading protocol-independent numerical model that does not require estimates of modeling parameters specifically tuned for a certain loading protocol. The accuracy of the proposed model is verified by comparing the simulated and measured cyclic curves of different sets of identical RC column specimens under various loading protocols.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. ASCE. (2017). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. ASCE 41–17, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
2. ATC. (2010). Modeling and acceptance criteria for seismic design and analysis of tall buildings. ATC 72–1. Applied Technology Council, CA.
3. Berry, M., Parrish, M., & Eberhard, M. (2004). PEER Structural Performance database user’s manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center: University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
4. Chowdhury, S. R., & Orakcal, K. (2012). An analytical model for reinforced concrete columns with lap splices. Engineering Structures, 43, 180–193.10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.019 ↗
5. Clough, R.W., Johnston, S.B. (1966). Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements. Proceedings of Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Tokyo.
6. Eads, L., Miranda, E., Krawinkler, H., & Lignos, D. G. (2013). An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dyannmics, 42(1), 25–41.10.1002/eqe.2191 ↗
7. Elkady, A., & Lignos, D. G. (2014). Modeling of the composite action in fully restrained beam-to-column connections: implications in the seismic design and collapse capacity of steel special moment frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dyannmics, 43(13), 1935–1954.10.1002/eqe.2430 ↗
8. El-Sokkary, H., & Galal, K. (2009). Analytical investigation of the seismic performance of RC frames rehabilitated using different rehabilitation techniques. Engineering Structures, 31(9), 1955–1966.10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.048 ↗
9. Elwood, K. J., & Moehle, J. P. (2005). Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement. Earthquake Spectra, 21(1), 71–89.10.1193/1.1849774 ↗
10. FEMA P440A. (2009). Effects of strength and stiffness degradation on seismic response. FEMA P440A. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, D.C.
11. FEMA 440. (2005). Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. FEMA 440. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
12. Galanis, P. H., & Moehle, J. P. (2015). Development of collapse indicators for risk assessment of older-type reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 31(4), 1991–2006.10.1193/080613EQS225M ↗
13. Ghannoum, W. M., & Moehle, J. R. (2012). Dynamic collapse analysis of a concrete frame sustaining column axial failures. ACI Structural Journal, 109(3), 403–412.
14. Goulet, C. A., Haselton, C. B., Mitrani-Reiser, J., Beck, J. L., Deierlein, G. G., Porter, K. A., & Stewart, J. P. (2007). Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building—from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dyannmics, 36(13), 1973–1997.10.1002/eqe.694 ↗
15. Han, S. W., Koh, H., & Lee, C. S. (2019). Accurate and efficient simulation of cyclic behavior of diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams. Earthquake Spectra, 35(1), 361–381.10.1193/060717EQS108M ↗
16. Han, S. W., Kwon, O.-S., & Lee, L.-H. (2004). Evaluation of the seismic performance of a three-story ordinary moment-resisting concrete frame. Earthquake engineering and structural dyannmics, 33(6), 669–685.10.1002/eqe.367 ↗
17. Haselton, C. B., Liel, A. B., Deierlein, G. G., Dean, B. S., & Chou, J. H. (2011). Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings i: assessment of ductile moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 137(4), 481–491.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000318 ↗
18. Haselton, C.B., Liel, A.B., Lange, S.T., Deierlein, G.G. (2007). Beam-Column Element Model Calibrated for Predicting Flexural Response Leading to Global Collapse of RC Frame Buildings. PEER Report 2007/03. University of California, Berkeley, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
19. Ibarra, L. F., Medina, R. A., & Krawinkler, H. (2005). Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dyannmics, 34(12), 1489–1511.10.1002/eqe.495 ↗
20. Krajcinovic, D. (1983). Constitutive equations for damaging materials. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 50(2), 355–360.10.1115/1.3167044 ↗
21. Krawinkler, H.(2009). Loading histories for cyclic tests in support of performance assessment of structural components. Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering (3AESE), San Francisco, CA.
22. LeBorgne, M. R., & Ghannoum, W. M. (2014a). Calibrated analytical element for lateral-strength degradation of reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Structures, 81, 35–48.10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.030 ↗
23. Lee, C. S., & Han, S. W. (2018). Computationally effective and accurate simulation of cyclic behaviour of old reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Structures, 173, 892–907.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.020 ↗
24. Li, Y., & Sanada, Y. (2017). Seismic strengthening of existing RC beam-column joints by wing walls. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dyannmics, 46(12), 1987–2008.10.1002/eqe.2890 ↗
25. Liao, W.-C., Perceka, W., & Wang, M. (2017). Experimental study of cyclic behavior of high-strength reinforced concrete columns with different transverse reinforcement detailing configurations. Engineering Structures, 153, 290–301.10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.011 ↗
26. Liel, A. B., Haselton, C. B., & Deierlein, G. G. (2011). Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. II: comparative assessment of nonductile and ductile moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 37(4), 492–502.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000275 ↗
27. Lignos, D. G., Hikino, T., Matsuoka, Y., & Nakashima, M. (2013). Collapse assessment of steel moment frames based on e-defense full-scale shake table collapse tests. Journal of structural engineering, ASCE, 139(1), 120–132.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000608 ↗
28. Lignos, D. G., & Krawinkler, H. (2011). Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 137(11), 1291–1302.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376 ↗
29. Lignos, D. G., Putman, C., & Krawinkler, H. (2015). Application of simplified analysis procedures for performance-based earthquake evaluation of steel special moment frames. Earthquake Spectra, 31(4), 1949–1968.10.1193/081413EQS230M ↗
30. LeBorgne, M.R., Ghannoum, W. M. (2014). Analytical Element for Simulating Lateral-Strength Degradation in Reinforced Concrete Columns and Other Frame Members. Journal of structural engineering, ASCE, 140(7), 04014038 04014031–04014012.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000925 ↗
31. Lowes, L.N., Altoontash, A.(2003). Modeling reinforced-concrete beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. Journal of structural engineering ASCE, 129(12), 1686–1697.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1686) ↗
32. Lynn, A. C., Moehle, J. P., Mahin, S. A., & Holmes, W. T. (1996). Seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete building columns. Earthquake Spectra, 12(4), 715–739.10.1193/1.1585907 ↗
33. Maison, B. F., & Speicher, M. S. (2016). Loading protocols for ASCE 41 backbone curves. Earthquake Spectra., 32(4), 2513–2532.10.1193/010816EQS007EP ↗
34. Mahin, S. A., & Bertero, V. V. (1976). Nonlinear seismic response of a coupled wall system. Journal of Structure Division, ASCE, 102(9), 1759–1780.10.1061/JSDEAG.0004428 ↗
35. Moon, K. H., Han, S. W., & Lee, C. S. (2017). Seismic retrofit design method using friction damping systems for old low- and mid-rise regular reinforced concrete buildings. Enginering Structures, 146, 105–117.10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.031 ↗
36. NIST. (2010). Nonlinear structural analysis for seismic design. NIST GCR 10–917–5, vol. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
37. Nojavan, A., Schultz, A. E., Haselton, C., Simathathien, S., Liu, X., & Chao, S.-H. (2015). A new data set for full-scale reinforced concrete columns under collapse-consistent loading protocols. Earthquake Spectra, 31(2), 1211–1231.10.1193/040314EQS047 ↗
38. Park, Y. J., & Ang, A. H. S. (1985). Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 111(4), 722–739.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722) ↗
39. Park, R., Paulay, T.(1975) Reinforced Concrete Structures. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470172834 ↗
40. PEER. (2017). Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings, version 2.03. CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center.
41. Pujol, S., Sozen, M. A., & Ramirez, J. A. (2006). Displacement history effects on drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns. ACI Materials Journal, 103(2), 253–262.
42. Ronagh, H. R., & Baji, H. (2014). On the FE modeling of frp-retrofitted beam-column subassemblies. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 8, 141–155.10.1007/s40069-013-0047-y ↗
43. Sae-Long, W., Limkatanyu, S., Prachasaree, W., Horpibulsuk, S., & Panedpojaman, P. (2019). Nonlinear frame element with shear-flexure interaction for seismic analysis of non-ductile reinforced concrete columns. International Journal of Conmcrete Structure and Materials, 13, 1–19.10.1186/s40069-018-0311-2 ↗
44. Sezen, H., & Chowdhury, T. (2009). Hysteretic model for reinforced concrete columns including the effect of shear and axial load failure. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 135(2), 139–146.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(139) ↗
45. Sezen, H., & Moehle, J. R. (2006). Seismic tests of concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement. ACI Structural Journal, 103(6), 842–849.
46. Takemura, H., & Kawashima, K. (1997). Effect of hysteresis on ductility capacity of reinforced concrete bridge piers. Journal of Structural Engineering (JSCE), 43A, 849–858.
47. Tothong, P., & Luco, N. (2007). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures. Earthquake Enigneering and Structural Dynamics, 36(13), 1837–1860.10.1002/eqe.696 ↗
48. Wen, Y. K., Collins, K. R., Han, S. W., & Elwood, K. J. (1996). Dual-level designs of buildings under seismic loads. Structural Safety, 18(2–3), 195–224.10.1016/0167-4730(96)00011-2 ↗
49. Yue, J., Qian, J., & Beskos, D. E. (2016). A generalized multi-level seismic damage model for RC framed structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 80, 25–39.10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.10.005 ↗