Experimental and Numerical Studies on the Mechanical Performance of a Wall-beam-strut Joint with Mechanical Couplers for Prefabricated Underground Construction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates the nonlinear behavior of wall-beam-strut joints with mechanical couplers, which are proposed for prefabricated underground constructions, under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions using full-scale experimental tests and three-dimensional finite element modelings. The nonlinear behavior of the joint is discussed in terms of the load–displacement curves, concrete cracking distributions, and strains in the reinforcements obtained from both the experimental tests and the numerical modeling. The comparison indicates that the trends of both load–displacement curves are similar, although the cracking, yield and ultimate loads of the joints determined by the numerical modeling are 2.5% lower, 2.6% higher and 3.8% higher, respectively, than those determined by the experimental tests. The numerical simulation can capture the concrete cracking process in the joint in the early loading stage but cannot accurately model the crack distribution in later stages. Moreover, the reinforcement strains and the skeleton curve from the numerical modeling show the same tendency as those from the experimental test, but it is difficult to compare their exact values, especially after yielding. The differences are believed due to the fact that the numerical modeling idealizes the materials and fails to model the slippage between the reinforcements and concrete after the concrete cracking. On the basis of the experimental and numerical investigations, it is concluded that the proposed wall-beam-strut joint has not only an ultimate bearing capacity that is at least 3 times higher than the design load but also a good ductility. Therefore, the design of the wall-beam-strut joint satisfies the requirements for the prefabricated underground construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual 6.14-3. (2016) Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence.
2. Ameli, M. J., & Pantelides, C. P. (2017). Seismic analysis of precast concrete bridge columns connected with grouted splice sleeve connectors. Journal of Structural Engineering,143(2), 04016176.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001678 ↗
3. Ameli, M. J., et al. (2015). Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for reinforced precast concrete column-to-cap beam joints in accelerated bridge construction. PCI Journal,60(2), 80–103.10.15554/pcij.03012015.80.103 ↗
4. Ameli, M. J., et al. (2016). Seismic column-to-footing connections using grouted splice sleeves. ACI Structural Journal,113(5), 1021.10.14359/51688755 ↗
5. Behnam, H., Kuang, J. S., & Samali, B. (2018). Parametric finite element analysis of RC wide beam-column connections. Computers & Structures,205, 28–44.10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.04.004 ↗
6. Bompa, D. V., & Elghazouli, A. Y. (2017). Ductility considerations for mechanical reinforcement couplers. In Structures (Vol. 12, pp. 115–119). Elsevier.10.1016/j.istruc.2017.08.007 ↗
7. Bompa, D. V., & Elghazouli, A. Y. (2018). Monotonic and cyclic performance of threaded reinforcement splices. In Structures (Vol. 16, pp. 358–372). Elsevier.10.1016/j.istruc.2018.11.009 ↗
8. Bompa, D. V., & Elghazouli, A. Y. (2019). Inelastic cyclic behaviour of RC members incorporating threaded reinforcement couplers. Engineering Structures,180, 468–483.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.053 ↗
9. Chidambaram, R. S., & Agarwal, P. (2018). Performance evaluation of innovative hybrid rebar coupler in reinforced concrete beams subjected to monotonic loading. Structural Concrete,19(3), 892–903.10.1002/suco.201700083 ↗
10. dos Santos, L. R., de Sousa Cardoso, H., Caldas, R. B., & Grilo, L. F. (2020). Finite element model for bolted shear connectors in concrete-filled steel tubular columns. Engineering Structures,203, 109863.10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109863 ↗
11. Genikomsou, A. S., & Polak, M. A. (2015). Finite element analysis of punching shear of concrete slabs using damaged plasticity model in ABAQUS. Engineering Structures,98, 38–48.10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.016 ↗
12. Haber, Z. B., Saiidi, M. S., & Sanders, D. H. (2014). Seismic performance of precast columns with mechanically spliced column-footing connections. ACI Structural Journal,111(3), 639–650.10.14359/51686624 ↗
13. Kazemi, M., Li, J., Harehdasht, S. L., Yousefieh, N., Jahandari, S., & Saberian, M. (2020). Non-linear behaviour of concrete beams reinforced with GFRP and CFRP bars grouted in sleeves. In Structures (Vol. 23, pp. 87–102). Elsevier.10.1016/j.istruc.2019.10.013 ↗
14. Liu, M., Jia, S., & Liu, X. (2019a). Evaluation of mitigation potential of GHG emissions from the construction of prefabricated subway station. Journal of Cleaner Production,236, 117700.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117700 ↗
15. Liu, J., Peng, Q., Chen, J., & Yin, Y. (2019b). Connectivity reliability on an urban rail transit network from the perspective of passenger travel. Urban Rail Transit,6, 1–14.10.1007/s40864-019-00117-z ↗
16. Liu, T., Lu, J. et al. (2020) Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior of wall-beam-strut joints of a prefabricated underground construction. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials(Under Review)10.1186/s40069-020-00441-w ↗
17. Lu, L. H., Wang, W. T., Wang, G. F., Xu, Q. W., & Wang, Y. J. (2018). Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties and Deformation Characteristics of Prefabricated Concrete Square Pile. In GeoShanghai International Conference pp. 520–527). Springer, Singapore.10.1007/978-981-13-0131-5_56 ↗
18. Nana, W. S. A., Bui, T. T., Limam, A., & Abouri, S. (2017). Experimental and numerical modelling of shear behaviour of full-scale RC slabs under concentrated loads. In Structures (Vol. 10, pp. 96–116). Elsevier.10.1016/j.istruc.2017.02.004 ↗
19. Sidoroff, F. (1981). Description of anisotropic damage application to elasticity. In Physical Non-Linearities in Structural Analysis (pp. 237–244). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-81582-9_35 ↗
20. Wang, H., Marino, E. M., & Pan, P. (2019). Design, testing and finite element analysis of an improved precast prestressed beam-to-column joint. Engineering Structures,199, 109661.10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109661 ↗
21. Wosatko, A., Winnicki, A., Polak, M. A., & Pamin, J. (2019). Role of dilatancy angle in plasticity-based models of concrete. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering,19(4), 1268–1283.10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.003 ↗
22. Wu, R.-Y., & Pantelides, C. P. (2018). Concentrated and distributed plasticity models for seismic repair of damaged RC bridge columns. Journal of Composites for Construction,22(5), 04018044.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000879 ↗
23. Xiu, C. H., Li, H., Wang, W. X., & Xu, Q. W. (2018). Study on the Force and Deformation Characteristics of Prefabricated Pile-Wall Compound Structure and Its Application in Foundation Pit Engineering. In GeoShanghai International Conference (pp. 503–510). Springer, Singapore.10.1007/978-981-13-0131-5_54 ↗
24. Yang, X., Huang, M., & Lin, F. (2019a) Research strategies on new prefabricated technology for underground metro stations. Urban Rail Transit, 1–10.10.1007/s40864-019-0106-z ↗
25. Yang, X., Shi, Z., & Lin, F. (2019b). Research on shear capacity and checking method of MT·G-joint for application in prefabricated underground structures. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019.10.1155/2019/4065301 ↗
26. Zhang, L., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2019). Carbon emission reduction potential of urban rail transit in China based on electricity consumption structure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,142, 113–121.10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.019 ↗