Critical Grain Size of Fine Aggregates in the View of the Rheology of Mortar
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this research was to investigate the validity of the Krieger–Dougherty model as a quantitative model to predict the viscosity of mortar depending on various aggregate sizes. The Krieger–Dougherty model reportedly predicted the viscosity of a suspension, which includes cement-based materials. Concrete or mortar incorporates natural resources, such as sand and gravel, referred to as aggregates, which can make up as much as 80% of the mixture by volume. Cement paste is a suspending medium at fresh state and then becomes a binder to link the aggregate after its hydration. Both the viscosity of the suspending medium and the characteristics of the aggregates, therefore, control the viscosity of the cement-based materials. In this research, various sizes and gradations of fine aggregate samples were prepared. Workability and rheological properties were measured using fresh-state mortar samples and incorporating the various-sized fine aggregates. Yield stress and viscosity measurements were obtained by using a rheometer. Based on the packing density of each fine aggregate sample, the viscosity of the mortar was predicted with the Krieger–Dougherty model. In addition, further adjustments were made to determine the water absorption of fine aggregates and was transferred from successful experiment to simulation for more accurate prediction. It was also determined that both yield stress and viscosity increase when the fine aggregate mean size decreases throughout the mix. However, when the mean size of the fine aggregates is bigger than 0.7 mm, the yield stress is not affected by the size of the fine aggregate. Additionally, if aggregate grains get smaller up to 0.3 mm, their water absorption is critical to the rheological behavior.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM International. (2006). ASTM C136, standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregate. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. doi: 10.1520/C0136 .10.1520/C0136 ↗
2. ASTM International. (2010). ASTM C1611, standard test method for slump flow of self-consolidating concrete. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
3. ASTM International. (2012). ASTM C150, standard specification for Portland cement. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
4. ASTM International. (2015). ASTM C128, standard test method for density, relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. doi: 10.1520/C0128-15.2 .10.1520/C0128-15.2 ↗
5. Bairagi, N., Vidyadhara, H., & Ravande, K. (1990). Mix design procedure for recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 4, 188–193.10.1016/0950-0618(90)90039-4 ↗
6. Bentz, D. P., Ferraris, C. F., Galler, M. A., Hansen, A. S., & Guynn, J. M. (2012). Influence of particle size distributions on yield stress and viscosity of cement–fly ash pastes. Cement and Concrete Research, 42, 404–409. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.11.006 .10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.11.006 ↗
7. de Larrard, F., & Sedran, T. (2002). Mixture-proportioning of high-performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 32, 1699–1704. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00861-X .10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00861-X ↗
8. Erdem, K., Khayat, K. H., & Yahia, A. (2010). Correlating rheology of self-consolidating concrete to corresponding concrete-equivalent mortar. ACI Materials Journal, 106, 154–160.
9. Erdoğan, S., & Fowler, D. (2005). Determination of aggregate shape properties using X-ray tomographic methods and the effect of shape on concrete rheology (No. ICAR 106-1), Austin, TX.
10. Ferron, R., Gregori, A., Sun, Z., & Shah, S. (2007). Rheological method to evaluate structural buildup in self-consolidating concrete cement pastes. ACI Materials Journal, 104, 242–250.
11. George, H., & Qureshi, F. (2013). Newton’s law of viscosity. Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids: Encyclopedia Tribology. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_143 .10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_143 ↗
12. Goltermann, P., & Johansen, V. (1997). Packing of aggregates: an alternative tool to determine the optimal aggregate mix. ACI Materials Journal, 94, 435–443.
13. Hidalgo, J., Chen, C., & Struble, L. J. (2009). Correlation between paste and concrete flow behavior. ACI Materials Journal, 106, 281–288.
14. Khayat, K. (1995). Effects of antiwashout admixtures on fresh concrete properties. ACI Materials Journal, 92, 164–171.
15. Khodakov, G. (2004). On suspension rheology. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 38, 400–439.10.1023/B:TFCE.0000036973.95412.a3 ↗
16. Kim, J. H., Jang, H. R., & Yim, H. J. (2015). Sensitivity and accuracy for rheological simulation of cement-based materials. Computers and Concrete, 15, 903–919. doi: 10.12989/cac.2015.15.6.903 .10.12989/cac.2015.15.6.903 ↗
17. Kim, J. H., Lee, J. H., Shin, T. Y., & Yoon, J. Y. (2017). Rheological method for alpha test evaluation of developing superplasticizers’ performance: Channel flow test. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. doi: 10.1155/2017/4214086 .10.1155/2017/4214086 ↗
18. Kim, J., Yim, H., & Kwon, S. (2014). Quantitative measurement of the external and internal bleeding of conventional concrete and SCC. Cement and Concrete Composites, 54, 34–39.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.05.006 ↗
19. Koehler, E., & Fowler, D. (2004). Development of a Portable rheometer for fresh Portland cement concrete (No. ICAR 105-3F), Austin, TX.
20. Krieger, I. M., & Dougherty, T. J. (1959). A mechanism for non-newtonian flow in suspensions of rigid spheres. Transactions Society of Rheology, 3, 137–152. doi: 10.1122/1.548848 .10.1122/1.548848 ↗
21. Kwan, A. K. H., Li, L. G., & Fung, W. W. S. (2012). Wet packing of blended fine and coarse aggregate. Materials and Structures, 45, 817–828.10.1617/s11527-011-9800-3 ↗
22. Mahmoodzadeh, F., & Chidiac, S. (2013). Rheological models for predicting plastic viscosity and yield stress of fresh concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 49, 1–9.10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.004 ↗
23. Nanthagopalan, P., & Santhanam, M. (2011). Fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete produced with manufactured sand. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33, 353–358.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.11.005 ↗
24. Park, T., Noh, M., & Park, C. (2004). Characterization of rheology on the multi-ingredients paste systems mixed with mineral admixtures. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 16, 241–248.10.4334/JKCI.2004.16.2.241 ↗
25. Quiroga, P., & Fowler, D. (2004). The effects of aggregates characteristics on the performance of Portland cement concrete (No. ICAR 104-1F), Austin, TX.
26. Roussel, N., Lemaître, A., Flatt, R., & Coussot, P. (2010). Steady state flow of cement suspensions: A micromechanical state of the art. Cement and Concrete Research, 40, 77–84.10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.026 ↗
27. Song, C., Wang, P., & Makse, H. A. (2008). A phase diagram for jammed matter. Nature, 453, 629–632. doi: 10.1038/nature06981 .10.1038/nature06981 ↗
28. Toutou, Z., & Roussel, N. (2006). Multi scale experimental study of concrete rheology: from water scale to gravel scale. Materials and Structures, 39, 189–199. doi: 10.1617/s11527-005-9047-y .10.1617/s11527-005-9047-y ↗
29. Wallevik, O. H., & Wallevik, J. E. (2011). Rheology as a tool in concrete science: The use of rheographs and workability boxes. Cement and Concrete Research, 41, 1279–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.01.009 .10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.01.009 ↗
30. Westerholm, M., Lagerblad, B., Silfwerbrand, J., & Forssberg, E. (2008). Influence of fine aggregate characteristics on the rheological properties of mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 30, 274–282.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.08.008 ↗
31. Wildemuth, C. R., & Williams, M. C. (1984). Viscosity of suspensions modeled with a shear-dependent maximum packing fraction. Rheologica Acta, 23, 627–635. doi: 10.1007/BF01438803 .10.1007/BF01438803 ↗