Investigation on Acoustic Emission Parameters due to Fatigue Damage of Concrete Beams with Variable Notched Depth
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Acoustic Emission (AE) application for Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) has undergone a swift advance through research and innovation in recent times. The AE monitoring is widely exploited as a tool for damage detection in materials research and structure monitoring. Various advantages of the AE, such as the potential use in large and complex structures, high-sensitivity, real-time monitoring capability, and potential application across a wide range of field study, has given the technique an edge over other approaches. Nevertheless, most of the reported studies had focused on the interpretation of the results in both quantitative and qualitative perspectives to extend the capabilities and application of AE for damage detection strategy. Eventually, the quantification of the damage level of the concrete structure relative to fatigue loading remained unanswered. Therefore, this study presented the experimental investigation of four types of plain concrete beams with a fixed dimension of 100 × 200 × 600 mm in the different notch-to-depth ratios under cyclic loading. A setup of the instrument consisting of four AE sensors type R6I was employed on each concrete beam sample to ensure a precise measurement for the three-point bending test. The b-value, improved b-value (Ib-value), severity, and intensity analysis methods were applied to quantify the damage level of the concrete structure under fatigue loading. Based on the results, the AE analysis successfully classified the damage levels following the observation made during the increasing cyclic loading on the notched concrete beams, the initiation of cracks, the steady growth of cracks, and beam failure. Valuable insights were recorded throughout the observation, including the progression of the fatigue failure mechanism from the Ib-value results, the intensity chart patterns from the intensity analysis, and the increased severity due to the increased loading cycles from the severity analysis. Conclusively, this study would enable researchers to understand the trend in monitoring the damage level under fatigue loading using the AE technique as well as providing fresh insights for further research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Aggelis, D. G. (2011). Classification of cracking mode in concrete by acoustic emission parameters. Mechanics Research Communications, 38(3), 153–157.10.1016/j.mechrescom.2011.03.007 ↗
2. Angelis, T. G., Shiotani, T., Momoki, S., & Hirama, A. (2009). Acoustic emission and ultrasound for damage characterization of concrete elements. ACI Materials Journal, 106(6), 1–6.
3. Antonaci, P., Bocca, P., & Masera, D. (2012). Fatigue crack propagation monitoring by Acoustic Emission signal analysis. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 81, 26–32.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.09.017 ↗
4. American Society for Testing and Material. (2006). ASTM E 2478:2006. Standard practice for determining damage-based design stress for fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) materials using acoustic emission. West 203 Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International, p. 6.
5. Baqersad, J., Niezrecki, C., & Avitabile, P. (2015). Full-field dynamic strain prediction on a wind turbine using displacements of optical targets measured by stereophotogrammetry. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 62, 284–295.10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.03.021 ↗
6. Basri, S. R., Bunnori, N. M., Kudus, S. A., Shahiron, S., Jamil, M. N. M., & Noorsuhada, M. N. (2013). Applications of acoustic emission technique associated with the fracture process zone in concrete beam—A review. Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publication., 626, 147–151.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.626.147 ↗
7. Bruck, H. A., McNeill, S. R., Sutton, M. A., & Peters, W. H. (1989). Digital image correlation using Newton-Raphson method of partial differential correction. Experimental Mechanics, 29(3), 261–267.10.1007/BF02321405 ↗
8. Bunnori, M. N. (2008). Acoustic emission technique for the Damag assessment of reinforced concrete structures. Ph.D Thesis, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
9. Bunnori, N., Nor, N., Jiun, K., & Kudus, S. (2016). Analysis of failure mechanisms in fatigue test of reinforced concrete beam utilizing acoustic emission. The International Journal of Multiphysics, 8(4).10.1260/1750-9548.8.4.349 ↗
10. Bunnori, M. N., Lark, R. J., & Holford, K. M. (2011). The use of acoustic emission for the early detection of cracking in concrete structures. Magazine of Concrete Research, 63(9), 683–688.10.1680/macr.2011.63.9.683 ↗
11. Carey S. (1991). Damage detection and characterization in CFRP composites using acoustic emission and acousto-ultrasonics. Ph.D Thesis, University of South Carolina.
12. Carpinteri, A., Lacidogna, G., Corrado, M., & Di Battista, E. (2016). Cracking and crackling in concrete-like materials: A dynamic energy balance. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 155, 130–144.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.01.013 ↗
13. Carpinteri, A., Lacidogna, G., & Niccolini, G. (2009). Fractal analysis of damage detected in concrete structural elements under loading. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 42(4), 2047–2056.10.1016/j.chaos.2009.03.165 ↗
14. Chotickai, P. (2001). Acoustic emission monitoring of prestressed bridge girders with premature concrete deterioration. M.Sc Thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
15. Colombo, I. S., Main, I. G., & Forde, M. C. (2003). Assessing damage of reinforced concrete beam using “b-value” analysis of acoustic emission signals. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 15(3), 280–286.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(280) ↗
16. Croxford, A. J., Wilcox, P. D., Drinkwater, B. W., & Konstantinidis, G. (2007). Strategies for guided-wave structural health monitoring. Proceedings of the Royal Society a: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 463(2087), 2961–2981.10.1098/rspa.2007.0048 ↗
17. Degala S. (2008). Acoustic emission monitoring of reinforced concrete systems retrofitted with CFRP [Master’s Thesis]. University of Pittsburgh.
18. Degala, S., Rizzo, P., Ramanathan, K., & Harries, K. A. (2009). Acoustic emission monitoring of CFRP reinforced concrete slabs. Construction and Building Materials, 23(5), 2016–2026.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.026 ↗
19. Eskandari, H., Muralidhara, S., Raghuprasad, B. K., & Reddy, B. V. V. (2010). Size effect in self consolidating concrete beams with and without notches. Sadhana, 35, 303–317.10.1007/s12046-010-0012-2 ↗
20. Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2012). Structural health monitoring: A machine learning perspective. Wiley.10.1002/9781118443118 ↗
21. Finlayson, R. D., Firesel, M., Carlos, M., Cole, P., & Lenain, J. C. (2001). Health monitoring of aerospace structures with acoustic emission and acousto-ultrasonics. Insight, 43(3), 1–4.
22. Glišić, B., & Inaudi, D. (2007). Fibre optic methods for structural health monitoring (p. 276). Wiley.10.1002/9780470517819 ↗
23. Golaski, L., Pawel, G., & Kanji, O. (2002). Diagnostic of reinforced concrete bridge by acoustic emission. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 20(1), 83–98.
24. Gostautas, R. S., Ramirez, G., Peterman, R. J., & Meggers, D. (2005). Acoustic emission monitoring and analysis of glass fiber-reinforced composites bridge decks. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10(6), 713–721.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:6(713) ↗
25. Holford, K. M., Davies, A. W., Pullin, R., & Carter, D. C. (2001). Damage location in steel bridges by acoustic emission. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 12(8), 567–576.10.1177/10453890122145311 ↗
26. Im, S. B., Hurlebaus, S., & Kang, Y. J. (2013). Summary review of GPS technology for structural health monitoring. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(10), 1653–1664.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000475 ↗
27. Kaphle, M., Tan A. C. C., Thambiratnam, D. P., & Chan, T. H. T. (2011). Damage Quantification Techniques in Acoustic Emission Monitoring. WCEAM 2011 Sixth World Congress on Engineering Asset Management, Cincinnati, OH, USA, p. 1–6.
28. Karihaloo, B. L. (1995). Fracture mechanics and structural concrete, Longman Scientific & Technical, England.
29. Kim, S., Pakzad, S., Culler, D., Demmel, J., Fenves, G., Glaser, S., & Turon, M. (2006). Wireless sensor networks for structural health monitoring. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems (pp. 427–428).10.1145/1182807.1182889 ↗
30. Kudus, S. A. (2014). Study on fatigue damage of concrete beams with variable notched depth using acoustic emission technique (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia).
31. Kurz, J. H., Finck, F., Grosse, C. U., & Reinhardt, H. W. (2006). Stress drop and stress distribution in concrete quantified over time by the b-value analysis. Structural Health Monitoring, 5(1), 69–81.10.1177/1475921706057983 ↗
32. Lacidogna, G., Piana, G., Accornero, F., & Carpinteri, A. (2020). Multi-technique damage monitoring of concrete beams: acoustic emission, digital image correlation, dynamic identification. Construction and Building Materials, 242, 118114.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118114 ↗
33. López-Higuera, J. M., Cobo, L. R., Incera, A. Q., & Cobo, A. (2011). Fiber optic sensors in structural health monitoring. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 29(4), 587–608.10.1109/JLT.2011.2106479 ↗
34. Lovejoy, S. C. (2008). Acoustic emission testing of beams to simulate SHM of vintage reinforced concrete deck girder highway bridges. Structural Health Monitoring, 7(4), 329.10.1177/1475921708090567 ↗
35. Lynch, J. P. (2007). An overview of wireless structural health monitoring for civil structures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851), 345–372.10.1098/rsta.2006.1932 ↗
36. Lynch, J. P., & Loh, K. J. (2006). A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock and Vibration Digest, 38(2), 91–130.10.1177/0583102406061499 ↗
37. Mitra, M., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2016). Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review. Smart Materials and Structures, 25(5), 053001.10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/053001 ↗
38. Nagayama, T., & Spencer, B. F., Jr. (2007). Structural health monitoring using smart sensors. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
39. Nair, A., & Cai, C. S. (2010). Acoustic emission monitoring of bridges: Review and case studies. Engineering Structures, 32(6), 1704–1714.10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.020 ↗
40. Ohno, K., & Ohtsu, M. (2010). Crack classification in concrete based on acoustic emission. Construction and Building Materials, 24(12), 2339–2346.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.05.004 ↗
41. Pollock, A. A. (1981). Acoustic emission amplitude distributions. International Advances in Nondestructive Testing, 7, 215–239.
42. Prashanth, M. H., Singh, P., & Kishen, J. C. (2019). Role of longitudinal reinforcement on the behavior of under reinforced concrete beams subjected to fatigue loading. International Journal of Fatigue, 125, 271–290.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.047 ↗
43. Proverbio, E., Venturi, V. & Campanella, G. (2009). Damage assessment in post-tensioned concrete viaduct by b- and Ib- value analysis of AE signal. Proceeding Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering. 30 June–3 July, Nantes, France.
44. Proverbio, E. (2011). Evaluation of deterioration in reinforced concrete structures by AE technique. Materials and Corrosion, 62, 161–169.10.1002/maco.201005735 ↗
45. Raghavan, A. (2007). Guided-wave structural health monitoring (Doctoral dissertation).10.1177/0583102406075428 ↗
46. Rao, M. V. M. S., & Lakshmi, K. J. P. (2005). Analysis of b-value and improved b-value of acoustic emissions accompanying rock fracture. Current Science, 89, 1577–1582.
47. RILEM. (1991). TC 89-FMT Fracture mechanics of concrete–test methods. Materials and Structures, 23, 461–465.
48. Rteil, A. (2007). Fatigue Bond Behaviour of Corroded Reinforcement and CFRP Confined Concrete. Ph.D Thesis University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
49. Sagar, R. V., Prasad, B. K. R., & Kumar, S. S. (2012). An experimental study on cracking evolution in concrete and cement mortar by the b-value analysis of acoustic emission technique. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(8), 1094–1104.10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.05.003 ↗
50. Shah, S. G., & Chandra Kishen, J. M. (2010). Fracture behavior of concrete–concrete interface using acoustic emission technique. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 77(6), 908–924.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.01.018 ↗
51. Shahidan, S., Muhamad Bunnori, N., Md Nor, N. & Basri, S. R. (2012). Health index evaluation on acoustic emission signal for concrete structure by intensity analysis method. Advanced Materials Research, 403–408.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.403-408.3729 ↗
52. Shiotani, T., Shigeishi, M., & Ohtsu, M. (1999). Acoustic emission characteristics of concretepiles. Construction and Building Materials, 13(1), 73–85.10.1016/S0950-0618(99)00010-0 ↗
53. Worden, K., & Manson, G. (2007). The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851), 515–537.10.1098/rsta.2006.1938 ↗
54. Yu, J., Ziehl, P., Matta, F., & Pollock, A. (2013). Acoustic emission detection of fatigue damage in cruciform welded joints. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 86, 85–91.10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.03.017 ↗
55. Yuan, F. G., Zargar, S. A., Chen, Q., & Wang, S. (2020). Machine learning for structural health monitoring: challenges and opportunities. In Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2020 (Vol. 11379, p. 1137903). International Society for Optics and Photonics.10.1117/12.2561610 ↗
56. Yuyama, S., Li, Z. W., Yoshizawa, M., Tomokiyo, T., & Uomoto, T. (2001). Evaluation of fatigue damage in reinforced concrete slab by acoustic emission. NDT & E International, 34(6), 381–387.10.1016/S0963-8695(01)00004-4 ↗