Mechanical Properties of Energy Efficient Concretes Made with Binary, Ternary, and Quaternary Cementitious Blends of Fly Ash, Blast Furnace Slag, and Silica Fume
Source abstract
Abstract
When the energy performance of concrete is substantially higher than that of normal type concrete, such concrete is regarded as energy efficient concrete (WBSCSD 2009). An experimental study was conducted to investigate mechanical properties of energy efficient concrete with binary, ternary and quaternary admixture at different curing ages. Slump test for workability and air content test were performed on fresh concretes. Compressive strength, splitting tensile strength were made on hardened concrete specimens. The mechanical properties of concrete were compared with predicted values by ACI 363R-84 Code, NZS 3101-95 Code, CSA A23.3-94 Code, CEB-FIP Model, EN 1991, EC 2-02, AIJ Code, JSCE Code, and KCI Code. The use of silica fume increased the compressive strengths, splitting tensile strengths, modulus of elasticities and Poisson’s ratios. On the other hand, the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength decreased with increasing fly ash.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 318-11. (2011). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318-11), Farmington Hills, MI.
2. ACI Committee 363, “State-of-the-Art Report on High-Strength Concrete (ACI 363R-84),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1984.
3. American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA; 2004. Official ASTM Standards. http://www.astm.org .
4. CEB-FIP. (1993). CEB-FIP Model code 1990: Design code. Comite Euro-international du Beton (CEB), Federation international de la Precontrainte (FIP), Tomas Telford, London, UK.
5. Carrasquillo, R. L., Nilson, A. H., & Slate, F. O. (1981). Properties of high-strength concrete subject to short-term loads. In Proceedings of America Concrete Institute (vol. 78, No. 3, 171–178).
6. CSA Technical Committee. (2004). Reinforced concrete design. A23.3-04. Design of concrete structures. Rexdale, Canada: Canadian Standard Association.
7. EN 1991. (1991) Designers’ guides to the eurocodes. 1991.
8. European committee for standardization, European Standard. (2002). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures.
9. Gao, J. M., Qian, C. X., Liu, H. F., Wang, B., & Li, L. (2005). ITZ microstructure of concrete containing GGBS. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(7), 1299–1304.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.042 ↗
10. Hassoun, J., & Choo, B. S. (2003). Advanced concrete technology: Concrete properties (pp. 4/1–6/22). New York, NY: Elsevier.
11. Japan Society of Civil Engineers. (2008). Concrete engineering series 82. 212 pp. (in Japanese)
12. KCI Committee (KCI-11). (2011). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (KCI-11), KCI. (in Korean)
13. Kim, S. W., Park, W. S., Jang, Y. I., Yun, S. H., Yun, H. D., & Kim, D. G. (2015). The effect of mineral admixture on the compressive strength development of concrete. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 8(13), 541–547.10.12988/ces.2015.53126 ↗
14. Limbachiya, M., Meddah, M. S., & Ouchagour, R. (2012). Use of recycled concrete aggregate in fly-ash concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 27, 439–449.
15. Liu, H., Bu, Y., Nazari, A., Sanjayan, J. G., & Shen, Z. (2016). Low elastic modulus and expansive well cement system: The application of gypsum microsphere. Construction and Building Materials, 106, 27–34.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.105 ↗
16. Nevile, A. (1997). Properties of concrete (pp. 269–311). New York, NY: Wiley.
17. New Zealand Standard. (1995). Concrete structures standard NZS 3101 1995. The design of concrete structures, Wellington, New Zealand.
18. Power, T. C., & Brownyard, T. L. (1946). Studies of physical properties of hardened portland cement paste. ACI Journal, 43, 101–132.
19. Vilanova, A., Fernandez-Gomez, J., & Landsbetger, G. A. (2011). Evaluation of the mechanical properties of self compacting concrete using current estimating models: Estimating the modulus of elasticity, tensile strength, and modulus of rupture of self compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25(8), 3417–3426.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.033 ↗
20. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)/International Energy Agency (IEA). (2009a). Cement technology roadmap 2009—Carbon emissions reductions up to 2050. www.iea.org/papers/2009/Cement_Roadmap.pdfS .
21. Zain, M. F. M., Mahmud, H. B., Ilhan, A., & Faizal, M. (2002). Prediction of splitting strength of high-performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 32, 1251–1258.10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00768-8 ↗