journal article·2018-12Open access

Effect of Loading and Beam Sizes on the Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Beams Under and After Fire

Eunmi Ryu, Yeongsoo Shin, Heesun Kim

Abstract

Performance-based fire resistance design needs consideration of various influencing parameters of structures such as load levels and cross-sectional size. Therefore, the studies of fire damaged reinforced concrete (RC) structures are performed experimentally and analytically. Twelve RC beams with different load levels and cross sections are exposed to high temperatures following the ISO 834 standard time temperature. After the fire test, the fire-damaged beams are loaded using four-point loading to obtain its residual strength. In addition, ABAQUS 6.10-3 is used to preform structural analyses of the ductility of the fire-damaged beams. The results indicate that the temperature, stiffness and ductility of the fire-damaged beams are significantly influenced by the load level, cross-sectional size and time exposed to fire. Also, the ductility of the fire-damaged beam can be predicted using an analytical method, which is not easy to otherwise determine experimentally.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fire effects on concrete materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Ashour, S. A. (2000). Effect of compressive strength and tensile reinforcement ratio on flexural behavior of high-strength concrete beams. Engineering Structures, 22(5), 413–423.10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00135-7 ↗
2. Cheng, F. P., Kodur, V. K. R., & Wang, T. C. (2004). Stress-strain curves for high strength concrete at elevated temperatures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 16(1), 84–90.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:1(84) ↗
3. Choi, J., Haj-Ali, R., & Kim, H. S. (2012). Integrated fire dynamic and thermomechanical modeling of a bridge under fire. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 42(6), 815–829.10.12989/sem.2012.42.6.815 ↗
4. Choi, J., Kim, H., & Haj-ali, R. (2010). Integrated fire dynamics and thermomechanical modeling framework for steel-concrete composite structures. Steel and Composite Structures, 10(2), 129–149.10.12989/scs.2010.10.2.129 ↗
5. European Committee. (1995). Eurocode2: Design of concrete structures-Part 1-2: General rules-Structural fire design. EN 1992-1-2.
6. Harmathy, T. Z. (1970). Thermal properties of concrete at elevated temperatures. Journal of Materials, 5(1), 47–74.
7. Harmathy, T. Z. (1993). Fire safety design and concrete, Scientific and Technical.
8. Hawileh, R. A., & Naser, M. Z. (2012). Thermal-stress analysis of RC beams reinforced with GFRP bars. Composites Part B Engineering, 43(5), 2135–2142.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.004 ↗
9. Hawileh, R. A., Naser, M., & Rasheed, H. A. (2011). Thermal-Stress finite element analysis of CFRP strengthened concrete beam exposed to top surface fire loading. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 18(3), 172–180.10.1080/15376494.2010.499019 ↗
10. Hawileh, R. A., Naser, M., Zaidan, W., & Rasheed, H. A. (2009). Modeling of insulated CFRP-strengthened reinforced concrete T-beam exposed to fire. Engineering Structures, 31(12), 3072–3079.10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.008 ↗
11. Hsu, J. H., Lin, C. S., & Huang, C. B. (2006). Modeling the effective elastic modulus of RC beams exposed to fire. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 14(2), 102–108.
12. ISO 834. (1999). Fire resistance tests—elements of building construction. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
13. Jau, W. C., & Huang, K. L. (2008). A study of reinforced concrete corner columns after fire. Cement and Concrete Composites, 30(7), 622–638.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.09.009 ↗
14. Kang, J., Yoon, H., Kim, W., Kodur, V., Shin, Y., & Kim, H. (2016). Effect of wall thickness on thermal behaviors of RC walls under fire conditions. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 10(3), 19–31.10.1007/s40069-016-0164-5 ↗
15. Kodur, V. K. R., & Sultan, M. A. (2003). Effect of temperature on thermal properties of high-strength concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 15(2), 101–107.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:2(101) ↗
16. Lamont, S., Usmani, A. S., & Drysdale, D. D. (2001). Heat transfer analysis of the composite slab in the Cardington frame fire tests. Fire Safety Journal, 36(8), 815–839.10.1016/S0379-7112(01)00041-8 ↗
17. Rashid, M. A., & Mansur, M. A. (2005). Reinforced high-strength concrete beams in flexure. Structural Journal, 102(3), 462–471.
18. Ryu, E. M., An, A. Y., Kang, J. Y., Shin, Y. S., & Kim, H. S. (2015). Investigation of rehabilitation effects on fire damaged high strength concrete beams. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9(7), 898–904.
19. Shin, Y. S., Park, J. E., Mun, J. Y., & Kim, H. S. (2011). experimental studies on the effect of various design parameters on thermal behaviors of high strength concrete columns under high temperatures. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 23(3), 377–384.10.4334/JKCI.2011.23.3.377 ↗
20. Sullivan, T. J., Calvi, G. M., & Priestley, M. J. N. (2004). Initial stiffness versus secant stiffness in displacement based design. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2888.
21. Wu, B., Xiong, W., & Wen, B. (2014). Thermal fields of cracked concrete members in fire. Fire Safety Journal, 66, 15–24.10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.04.003 ↗