journal article·2024-02-01Open access

Experimental and Numerical Study on the Behavior of RC Members under Combined Loads

Sangwoo Kim, Yeongseok Jeong, Minho Kwon, Jinsup Kim

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we present an investigation of the performance of reinforced concrete (RC) columns under combined bending loads and various axial forces using a finite element method (FEM) model developed with the ABAQUS finite element program, verified with actual experimental values. In the experimental study, we applied combined bending loads and various axial forces to four RC members. Two RC members were subjected to vertical cyclic loads using displacement control with 0% axial force, while the other two were tested with vertical cyclic loads, one with 10% axial force, and the other with 20% axial force. The axial force load was applied using a specially designed setup. The experimental results of the RC members include observations of final failure mode, ductility, and axial load–bending moment interaction curves (P–M correlation curves). The experimental study confirmed that as the axial force increased, cracks in the RC columns concentrated at the center of the column. The yield strength increased by 55% when the axial force ratio was 10%, and 106% when the axial force ratio was 20%. The maximum strength increased by 28% with a 10% axial force ratio, and 50% with a 20% axial force ratio. However, ductility tended to decrease as the axial force increased, reducing by 26% with a 10% axial force ratio and 60% with a 20% axial force ratio. The analytical study produced results consistent with the experimental research, showing similar numerical trends. Finally, when comparing theoretical values, experimental results, and analytical results using P–M correlation curves, we found that the experimental value has a safety rate of 18% compared to the theoretical value. The experimental and theoretical result values were similar. Therefore, it has been demonstrated experimentally and analytically that the current design has a safety value of about 18% for the performance of the actual structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS. (2011). Theory and user’s manual. Pawtucket (Rhode Island, USA): Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen Inc.
2. Akguzel, U., & Pampanin, S. (2010). Effects of variation of axial load and bidirectional loading on seismic performance of GFRP retrofitted reinforced concrete exterior beam-column joints. Journal of Composites for Construction, 14, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2010)14:1(94)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2010)14:1(94) ↗
3. Ali, R., & Umer, R. (2021). Efficiency of GFRP bars and hoops in recycled aggregate concrete columns: Experimental and numerical study. Composite Structures, 255, 112986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11298610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112986 ↗
4. American Concrete Institute. (2012). Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318). Michigan, USA: Farmington Hills.
5. Bechtoula, H., Kono, S., & Watanabe, F. (2005). Experimental and analytical investigations of seismic performance of cantilever reinforced concrete columns under varying transverse and axial loads. J Asian Archit Build Eng, 4, 467–474. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.4.46710.3130/jaabe.4.467 ↗
6. Carlo, F. D., Meda, A., & Rinaldi, Z. (2017). Numerical evaluation of the corrosion influence on the cyclic behaviour of RC columns. Engineering Structures, 153, 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.02010.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.020 ↗
7. Gautham, A., & Sahoo, D. R. (2022). Performance of SRC column-RC beam joints under combined axial and cyclic lateral loadings. Engineering Structures, 260, 114218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11421810.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114218 ↗
8. Ghasem, P., & Majid, G. (2019). Evaluation of concrete filled steel tube column confined with FRP. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 48(6), 4343–4354.
9. Ghasem, P., Majid, G., & Amin, M. (2020). An Experimental Study on Cyclic Performance of the Geometrically Prismatic Concrete-Filled Double Skin Steel Tubular (CFDST) Columns. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering., 45, 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00410-z10.1007/s40996-020-00410-z ↗
10. Ghasem, P., Majid, G., & Amin, M. (2021). Impact of temperature rise on the seismic performance of concrete-filled double skin steel columns with prismatic geometry. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 49(4), 20200037. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE2020003710.1520/JTE20200037 ↗
11. Kaish, A. B. M. A., Jamil, M., Raman, S. N., Zain, M. F. M., & Nahar, L. (2018). (2018) Ferrocement composites for strengthening of concrete columns: a review. Construction Build Materials., 160, 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.05410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.054 ↗
12. Kim, J. K., & Lee, S. S. (2000). The behaviour of reinforced concrete columns subjected to axial force and biaxial bending. Engineering Structures, 23, 1518–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00090-510.1016/S0141-0296(99)00090-5 ↗
13. Lee, J., & Fenves, G. L. (1998). (1998) Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124(8), 892–900. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399124:8(892)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399124:8(892) ↗
14. Li, L., Mander, J. B., & Dhakal, R. P. (2008). Bidirectional cyclic loading experiment on a 3D beam-column joint designed for damage avoidance. Journal of the Structural Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, 134, 1733–1742. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:11(1733)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:11(1733) ↗
15. Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S., & Onate, E. (1989). A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 25(3), 229–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-410.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
16. Mohamed, H. E. O., & Ali, R. (2021). Data-driven analysis of concrete-filled steel-tube CFRP-confined NSC columns. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 29(27), 5667–5688. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.196195310.1080/15376494.2021.1961953 ↗
17. Mohammadmahdi, E., Masoume, H., Milad, S., Fatemeh, A., Mohammad, Y., & Ghasem, P. (2021). Experimental investigation of residual flexural capacity of damaged reinforced concrete beams exposed to elevated temperatures. Engineering Structures, 240, 112388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11238810.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112388 ↗
18. Monti, G., & Nuti, C. (1992). Nonlinear cyclic behavior of reinforcing bars including buckling. J Struct Eng-ASCE, 118, 3268–3284. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:12(3268)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:12(3268) ↗
19. Qiu, F., Li, W., Pan, P., & Qian, J. (2002). Experimental tests on RC columns under biaxial quasi-static loading. Engrg Structures, 24, 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00108-010.1016/S0141-0296(01)00108-0 ↗
20. Rodrigues, H., Arêde, A., Varum, H., & Costa, A. G. (2013). Experimental evaluation of rectangular reinforced concrete column behaviour under biaxial cyclic loading. Earthquake Eng Struc, 42(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.220510.1002/eqe.2205 ↗
21. Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., Arêde, A., & Costa, A. (2012a). A comparative analysis of energy dissipation and equivalent viscous damping of RC columns subjected to uniaxial and biaxial loading. Engineering Structures, 35, 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.01410.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.014 ↗
22. Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., Arêde, A., & Costa, A. (2012b). Comparative efficiency analysis of different nonlinear modelling strategies to simulate the biaxial response of RC columns. Earthq Eng Eng Vibrat, 11, 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-012-0141-110.1007/s11803-012-0141-1 ↗
23. Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., & Costa, A. (2010). Simplified macro-model for infill masonry panels. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14, 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363246090308604410.1080/13632460903086044 ↗
24. Saatcioglu, M., & Ozcebe, G. (1989). Response of reinforced concrete columns to simulated seismic loading. ACI Structural Journal, 86, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.14359/260710.14359/2607 ↗
25. Selmy, Y. M., & El-Salakawy, E. F. (2022). Numerical investigation on the seismic behaviour of GFRP-reinforced concrete rectangular columns. Engineering Structures, 262, 114355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11435510.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114355 ↗
26. Shao, Y., Kuo, C. W., & Hung, C. C. (2021). Seismic performance of full-scale UHPC-jacket-strengthened RC columns under high axial loads. Engineering Structures, 243, 112657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11265710.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112657 ↗
27. Swesi, A. O., Cotsovos, D. M., & Dimitri, V. V. (2022). Effect of CFRP strengthening on response of RC columns to lateral static and impact loads. Composite Structures, 287, 115356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11535610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115356 ↗
28. Thamer, A., Ali, R., & Nabil, B. K. (2021). Experiments and numerical simulations of glass fiber reinforced polymers in structural fibers RC members. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures., 29(27), 6891–6906. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.198687010.1080/15376494.2021.1986870 ↗
29. Thermou, G. E., Papanikolaou, V. K., & Hajirasouliha, I. (2021). Structural performance of RC columns retrofitted with steel-reinforced grout jackets under combined axial and lateral loading. Engineering Structures, 245, 112946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11294610.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112946 ↗
30. Zulkifli, S., Hisbany, M. M., Ismail, R., Zakwan, F., Hazrina, A., & Ismail, B. N. (2020). Application of shape memory alloys (SMA) as a retrofit and strengthening component on reinforced concrete columns. Journal of Physics: Conference Series: IOP Publishing, 2020, 042104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/4/04210410.1088/1742-6596/1529/4/042104 ↗