journal article·2024-04-20Open access

Progressive Collapse of Typical and Atypical Reinforced Concrete Framed Buildings

Solomon Abebe Derseh, Tesfaye Alemu Mohammed, Girum Urgessa

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the progressive collapse potential of eight-story reinforced concrete framed buildings with several atypical structural configurations and compares results with a typical structural configuration. The alternative load path mechanism, the linear-static analysis procedure amplified by dynamic increase factors, and the demand capacity ratio criterion limits from the U.S. General Services Administration guideline were used to evaluate the vulnerability of the different atypical and typical framed structures. Variations in bay size, plan irregularity, and closely spaced columns were used to represent the atypical structural configurations. The extracted demand-capacity ratio (DCR) of the global structural response showed that the demand-capacity ratio for the longitudinal frame with short-span beams had a larger DCR than the transverse frame with longer beam spans with significant potential for progressive collapse. Furthermore, atypical building configurations with closely spaced columns failed by shear and showed the highest DCR limits. In addition to the global structural response, the local member end actions were also evaluated. The evaluation showed that the critical atypical frame configuration with closely spaced columns had a 91% and 127% maximum shear force and support bending moment value difference, respectively, when compared to a baseline typical frame configuration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fire effects on concrete materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. ASCE. (2007). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings: ASCE/SEI 41–06. American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/9780784408841 ↗
2. Caredda, G., Makoond, N., Buitrago, M., Sagaseta, J., Chryssanthopoulos, M., & Adam, J. M. (2023). Learning from the progressive collapse of buildings. Developments in the Built Environment. 1–2010.1016/j.dibe.2023.100194 ↗
3. Djauhari, Z., Yolanda, A., Ridwan, & Yuniarto, E. (2019). “Progressive collapse of regular and irregular reinforced concrete moment frame,” MATEC Web of Conferences. 276:0103510.1051/matecconf/201927601035 ↗
4. DOC. (2007). “Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings,” USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology-Technology Administration-U.S. Department of Commerce
5. DOD. (2009). Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse: UFC 4-023-03. Department of Defense.
6. EN. (2002). “Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings pr EN1992-1-1.” Brussels
7. Esfandiari, M., Haghighi, H., & Urgessa, G. (2023). Machine learning-based optimum reinforced concrete design for progressive collapse. Journal of Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.23364210.56748/ejse.233642 ↗
8. Esfandiari, M. J., & Urgessa, G. (2020). Progressive collapse design of reinforced concrete frames using structural optimization and machine learning. Structures, 28, 1252–1264.10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.039 ↗
9. Esfandiari, M. J., Urgessa, G., Sheikholarefin, S., & Manshadi, S. H. (2018). Optimization of reinforced concrete frames subjected to historical time-history loadings using DMPSO algorithm. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 58(5), 2119–2134.10.1007/s00158-018-2027-y ↗
10. Fu, F. (2016). Structural analysis and design to prevent disproportionate collapse. Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/b19662 ↗
11. Gagan, B. M., & Nayak, S. G. (2019). Progressive collapse analysis of atypical reinforced concrete framed structure. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 8, 532–535.
12. Garg, S., Agrawal, V., & Nagar, R. (2020). Improved progressive collapse resistance of irregular reinforced concrete flat slab buildings under different corner column failures. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1045/1/01202210.1088/1757-899X/1045/1/012022 ↗
13. Garg, S., Agrawal, V., & Nagar, R. (2020). Progressive collapse behavior of reinforced concrete flat slab buildings subject to column failures in different storeys. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.69210.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.692 ↗
14. Garg, S., Agrawal, V., & Nagar, R. (2021). Case study on strengthening methods for progressive collapse resistance of RC flat slab buildings. Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.04910.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.049 ↗
15. Garg, S., Agrawal, V., & Nagar, R. (2021). Sustainability assessment of methods to prevent progressive collapse of RC flat slabs. 28th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.12.00310.1016/j.procir.2020.12.003 ↗
16. GSA. (2003). Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. U.S. General Services Administration.
17. Haq, M., & Agarwal, A. (2019). Comparative analysis of progressive collapse of regular and irregular RC building. GCEC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8016-6_3710.1007/978-981-10-8016-6_37 ↗
18. Kazem, A., Kazem, H., & Monavari, B. (2012). Effect of progressive collapse in reinforced concrete and steel frame structures with irregularity in shape and height. WCEE, 15, 1–10.
19. Kevins, P., & Tushar, P. (2017). Effects of irregularity on progressive collapse of RCC building. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJR), 3(4), 1637–1647.
20. Khan, A. A., & Thomas, V. S. (2021). Progressive collapse performance of step back-set back building provided with secondary columns. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 08(07), 809–812.
21. Kiakojouri, F., Biagi, V. D., Chiala, B., & Sheidaii, M. R. (2020). Progressive collapse of framed building structures: Current knowledge and future prospects. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110061, pp.1–2110.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110061 ↗
22. Marchand, K. A., & Alfawakhiri, F. (2004). Blast and progressive collapse. American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.
23. Marchand, K. A., Stevens, D. J., Crowder, B., & Campbell, T. (2006). A review and update on department of defense progressive collapse guidance (pp. 34–37). Structure Magazine.
24. Obeng-Ankamah, N., Osei, J. B., & Adom-Asamoah, M. (2018). Linear static progressive collapse analysis of ductility dependent RC buildings: Case study of an 11-story building. Journal of Structural Technology, 3(2), 1–13.
25. Singh, R. S., Jamal, Y., & Khan, M. A. (2015). Progressive collapse analysis of reinforced concrete TYPmetrical and unsymmetrical framed structures by ETABS. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE), 2(12), 78–83.
26. Starossek, U. (2009). Progressive collapse of structures (1st ed.). Thomas Telford Limited.10.1680/pcos.36109 ↗
27. Sujeevan, D., & Kurminaidu, P. (2017). Progressive collapse analysis of reinforced concrete framed structures. International Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering, 06(08), 1988–1997.