Mechanical Properties and Flexural Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beams Containing Waste Material as Partial Replacement for Coarse Aggregates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The volume of waste materials and by products are increasing and endangering the environment safety. Some of these waste materials can be used in the production of building materials, such as concrete. In order to study the possibility of using some waste materials as aggregate replacement for the purpose of producing structural RC members this investigation was carried out. This research describes the results of test of reinforced concrete beams containing different types of waste materials, namely crumbed rubber, granular plastic, and crushed bricks. Ten RC beams containing different percentages (0%, 5%, 10%, and 15%) of waste materials as coarse aggregate replacement have been investigated. The beams were 150 × 200 mm in size and 2000 mm in length and tested under four points loading. Mechanical properties of the concrete used for the beams were also studied. Test results indicated a reduction in compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and elastic modulus due to the inclusion of the waste materials used. The maximum loss in concrete compressive strength was recorded to be 54.95%, 50.31%, and 20.41% for concrete mix with 15% crumbed rubber, plastic waste aggregate, and 5% crushed brick, respectively. Test results of the beams showed that ultimate load capacity was reduced by 30.21% and 9.94% when 15% of crumbed rubber and granular plastic were used, respectively. The failure mode of all the tested beams was similar and followed same pattern, steel yielding followed by concrete compression failure. Finally, based on the flexural capacity of the beams tested it is recommend that gravel replacement of up to 15% of crumbed rubber, granular plastic, and crushed brick can be safely used to produce normal type of RC beams for minor structural application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Abu-Saleem, M., Zhuge, Y., Hassanli, R., Ellis, M., Rahman, M., & Levett, P. (2021). Stress–strain behaviour and mechanical strengths of concrete incorporating mixed recycled plastics. Journal of Composite Science, 5, 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs506014610.3390/jcs5060146 ↗
2. (ACI 318-19) and Commentary. (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete. American Concrete Institute.
3. Ahmad, W., Ahmad, A., Ostrowski, K., Aslam, F., & Joyklad, P. (2021). A scientometric review of waste material utilization in concrete for sustainable construction. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0068310.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00683 ↗
4. Aiello, M. A., & Leuzzi, F. (2010). Waste tyre rubberized concrete: Properties at fresh and hardened state. Waste Management, 30(8–9), 1696–1704.10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.005 ↗
5. Akinyele, J., & Ajede, A. (2018). The use of granulated plastic waste in structural concrete. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 10(2), 169–175.10.1080/20421338.2017.1414111 ↗
6. Amiri, M., Hatami, F., & Golafshani, E. (2021). Evaluating the synergic effect of waste rubber powder and recycled concrete aggregate on mechanical properties and durability of concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0063910.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00639 ↗
7. ASTM C39. (2012). Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International.
8. ASTM C33. (2016). Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM International.
9. ASTM C496. (2011). Standard Test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International.
10. ASTM C496. (2014). Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
11. Atef, M., Bassioni, G., Azab, N., & Abdellatif, M. (2021). Assessment of cement replacement with fine recycled rubber particles in sustainable cementitious composites. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 30, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2021-000710.1515/jmbm-2021-0007 ↗
12. Baciu, A., Kiss, I., Desnica, E., & Sárosi, J. (2022). Reinforcing concrete with recycled plastic wastes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2212, 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2212/1/01203110.1088/1742-6596/2212/1/012031 ↗
13. Cachim, P. B. (2009). Mechanical properties of brick aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 23(3), 1292–1297.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.07.023 ↗
14. Hassanli, R., Youssf, O., & Mills, J. (2017). The behavior of structural members made with crumbed rubber concrete. In 28th biennial national conference of the concrete institute of Australia (p. 10).10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.006 ↗
15. Ikechukwu, A., & Shabangu, C. (2021). Strength and durability performance of masonry bricks produced with crushed glass and melted PET plastics. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 14, e00542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0054210.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00542 ↗
16. Ismail, M., & Hassan, A. (2016). Performance of full-scale self-consolidating rubberized concrete beams in flexure. ACI Materials Journal, 113(2), 207–218.
17. Keihani, R., Bahadori-Jahromi, A., & Clacy, T. J. (2019). Sustainable development of medium strength concrete using polypropylene as aggregate replacement. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 13(9), 588–599.
18. Kim, S., Yi, N., Kim, H., Kim, J., & Song, Y. (2010). Material and structural performance evaluation of recycled PET fiber reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 32(3), 232–240.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.002 ↗
19. Mendis, A., Al-Deen, S., & Ashraf, M. (2017). Effect of rubber particles on the flexural behavior of reinforced crumbed rubber concrete beams. Construction and Building Materials, 154, 644–657.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.220 ↗
20. Mohammed, A. (2017). Flexural behavior and analysis of reinforced concrete beams made of recycled PET waste concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 155, 593–604.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.096 ↗
21. Mohammed, T., Das, H., Mahmood, A., Rahman, M., & Awal, M. (2017). Flexural performance of RC beams made with recycled brick aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 134, 67–74.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.135 ↗
22. Nabilah, A., Noaman, N., Nasir, N., & Safiee, N. (2019). Experimental evaluation of flexural behavior of rubberized concrete beam. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(7), 999–1005.10.1007/s42107-019-00159-5 ↗
23. Pam, H., Kwan, A., & Islam, M. (2001). Flexural strength and ductility of reinforced normal- and high-strength concrete beams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures & Buildings, 146(4), 381–389.10.1680/stbu.2001.146.4.381 ↗
24. Rahmani, E., Dehestani, M., Beygi, M., Allahyari, H., & Nikbin, M. (2013). On the mechanical properties of concrete containing waste PET particles. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 1302–1308.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.041 ↗
25. Rasheed, L., & Salih, S. (2019). The structural characteristics of lightweight aggregate concrete beams. Journal of University of Babylon for Engineering Sciences, 27(2), 64–73.10.29196/jubes.v27i2.2293 ↗
26. Saikia, N., & de Brito, J. (2014). Mechanical properties and abrasion behavior of concrete containing shredded PET bottle waste as a partial substitution of natural aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 52, 236–244.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.049 ↗
27. Sandanayake, M., Bouras, Y., Haigh, R., & Vrcelj, Z. (2020). Current sustainable trends of using waste materials in concrete—A decade review. Sustainability, 12(22), 9622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1222962210.3390/su12229622 ↗
28. Snelson, D., Kinuthia, J., Davies, P., & Chang, S. (2009). Sustainable construction: Composite use of tyres and ash in concrete. Waste Management, 29(1), 360–367.10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.007 ↗
29. Strukar, K., Sipos, T., Dosanovic, T., & Rodrigues, H. (2018). Experimental study of rubberized concrete stress–strain behavior for improving constitutive model. Materials, 11, 2245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1111224510.3390/ma11112245 ↗
30. Uddin, M., Mahmood, A., Kamal, M., Yashin, S., & Zihan, Z. (2017). Effects of maximum size of brick aggregate on properties of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 134, 713–726.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.164 ↗
31. Wang, Z. (2019). Stress–strain behaviour of confined rubberised concrete. (Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Sheffield, England).
32. Wichrowska, K., Pawluczuk, E., Bołtryk, M., Jimenez, J., Rodriguez, J., & Morales, D. (2022). The performance of concrete made with secondary products—Recycled coarse aggregates, recycled cement mortar, and fly ash-slag mix. Materials, 15, 1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1504143810.3390/ma15041438 ↗
33. Xuan, W. H., Wu, Y. H., & Chen, Y. Z. (2017). Experimental research on compressive properties of concrete with different plastics content. Advances in Engineering Research. (Vol. 120). Nova Publishers.
34. Zeghad, M., Mitterpach, J., Safi, B., Amrane, B., & Saidi, M. (2017). Reuse of refractory brick wastes (RBW) as a supplementary cementitious material in a concrete. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 61(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppci.819410.3311/ppci.8194 ↗
35. Zhang, S., & Zong, L. (2014). Properties of concrete made with recycled coarse aggregate from waste brick. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 33(4), 1283–1289.10.1002/ep.11880 ↗