journal article·2021-12Open access

Investigation of Diagonal Strut Actions in Masonry-Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frames

Seung-Jae Lee, Tae-Sung Eom, Eunjong Yu

Abstract

Abstract This study analytically investigated the behavior of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills. For the analysis, VecTor2, a nonlinear finite element analysis program that implements the Modified Compression Field Theory and Disturbed Stress Field Model, was used. To account for the slip behavior at the mortar joints in the masonry element, the hyperbolic Mohr–Coulomb yield criterion, defined as a function of cohesion and friction angle, was used. The analysis results showed that the lateral resistance and failure mode of the infilled frames were significantly affected by the thickness of the masonry infill, cohesion on the mortar joint–brick interface, and poor mortar filling (or gap) on the masonry boundary under the beam. Diagonal strut actions developed along two or three load paths on the mortar infill, including the backstay actions near the tension column and push-down actions near the compression columns. Such backstay and push-down actions increased the axial and shear forces of columns, and ultimately affect the strength, ductility, and failure mode of the infilled frames.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Building materials and conservation · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 318. (2014). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI 318–14. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
2. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1998), Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings – Basic Procedures Manual, FEMA 306, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
3. Al-Chaar, G. (2002), Evaluating Strength and Stiffness of Unreinforced Masonry Infill Structures. Report No. ERDC/CERL TR-02–1, US Army Corps of Engineers.10.21236/ADA407072 ↗
4. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) / Structural Engineering Institute (SEI). (2017). Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI 41–17. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers.
5. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
6. Angelillo, M., Lourenco, P. B., and Milani, G. (2014). "Masonry behaviour and modelling", Mechanics of Masonry Structures (Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series, (CISM, 551).10.1007/978-3-7091-1774-3 ↗
7. Architectural Institute of Korea (AIK). (2016). Korean Building Code – Structural (KBC 2016). Seoul, Korea: Architectural Institute of Korea.
8. Atkinson, R. H., Amadei, B. P., Saeb, S., & Sture, S. (1989). Response of masonry bed joints in direct shear. Journal Structural Engineering, 115(9), 2276–2296.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:9(2276) ↗
9. Crisafulli, F.J. (1997), Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
10. Dolsek, M., & Fajfar, P. (2002). Mathematical modelling of an infilled RC frame structure based on the results of pseudo-dynamic tests. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(6), 1215–1230.10.1002/eqe.154 ↗
11. El-Dakhakhni, W. W., Mohamed, E., & Hamid, A. A. (2003). Three-strut model for concrete masonry-infilled steel frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(2), 127–185.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(177) ↗
12. European Committee for Standardization (ECS) (2005). Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures, Part 1.1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures. Belgium, 2005.
13. Facconi, L., Fausto, M., & Vecchio, F. J. (2018). Predicting Uniaxial Cyclic Compressive Behavior of Brick Masonry: New Analytical Model. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144, 2.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001961 ↗
14. Facconi, L., Plizzari, G., & Vecchio, F. J. (2014). Disturbed stress field model for unreinforced masonry. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140, 4.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000906 ↗
15. Kim, C., Yu, E., & Kim, M. (2016). Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete masonry infilled frames with different masonry wall thickness subjected to in-plane loading. Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, 29(1), 85–93.10.7734/COSEIK.2016.29.1.85 ↗
16. Lourenco, P. B., & Rots, J. G. (1997). Multisurface interface model for analysis of masonry structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(7), 660–668.
17. Lourenco, P. B., Rots, J. G., & Blaauwendraad, J. (1998). Continuum model for masonry: Parameter estimation and validation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124(6), 642–652.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:6(642) ↗
18. Mehrabi, A. B., & Shing, P. B. (1997). Finite element modeling of masonry-infilled RC frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(5), 604–613.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(604) ↗
19. Park, J. H., Jeon, S. H., & Kang, K. S. (2012). Seismic performance evaluation of masonry-infilled frame structures using equivalent strut models. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 16(1), 47–59.10.5000/EESK.2012.16.1.047 ↗
20. Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. USA: Wiley.10.1002/9780470172841 ↗
21. Rahman, A., & Ueda, T. (2014). Experimental investigation and numerical modeling of peak shear stress of brick masonry mortar joint under compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26, 9.
22. Rots, J. G. (1997). Structural Masonry: An Experimental/Numerical Basis for Practical Design Rules. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Balkema.
23. Stafford-Smith, B. (1966). Behavior of square infilled frames. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 92(1), 381–404.10.1061/JSDEAG.0001387 ↗
24. Stavridis, A., & Shing, P. B. (2010). Finite-element modeling of nonlinear behavior of masonry-infilled RC frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136(3), 285–296.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.116 ↗
25. Wong, P. S., Vecchio, F. J., & Trommels, H. (2013). VecTor2 & FormWorks User’s Manual (Second Edition) (p. 318). Department of Civil Engineering: University of Toronto, Toronto.
26. Yu, E. J., Kim, M. J., & Jung, D. G. (2016). A comparative study of equivalent strut models for seismic performance evaluation of masonry-infilled frame. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 18(2), 79–87.10.5000/EESK.2014.18.2.079 ↗
27. Zhai, C., Wang, X., Kong, J., Li, S., & Xie, L. (2017). Numerical simulation of masonry-infilled RC frames using XFEM. Journal of Structural Engineering, 143, 10.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001886 ↗