Investigation of Fiber Distribution in Concrete Batches Discharged from Ready-Mix Truck
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the findings of an investigation of the fiber content variations in concrete being discharged from a ready-mix truck at the construction site. Concrete samples were extracted from the truck drums at the beginning, middle and end of discharge. Subsequently, fibers in each sample were separated from the concrete, and weighed. Presumably, synthetic macro fibers will float towards the top, i.e. towards the drum opening, of the inclined, revolving truck-drum, while, on the other hand, steel fibers will tend to gravitate towards the lower parts of the mixer drum. Accordingly, the discharge batch, containing synthetic macro fibers, will contain a higher amount of synthetic fibers per unit volume at the start of discharge than the average unit volume fiber content of the mix, and the content will gradually decrease further down the batch. The discharge batch of steel fiber concrete will contain fewer fibers per unit volume at the start of discharge than the average unit volume fiber content of the mix, and the content should gradually increase further down the batch. The correctness of the foregoing is partly confirmed. A certain percentage of the truck loads did not comply with the proposed requirements, mainly steel fiber reinforced batches, indicating the necessity of a code or guideline amendment. A change in the Norwegian shotcrete directive was made in 2011, based upon experimental research work (2010), which, in combination with the subsequent University of Life Sciences report (2012), constitutes the foundation of this article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Concrete Construction Staff. (1997). Cracks in driveways: What is Acceptable? Chicago, Il: Concrete Construction Magazine.
2. Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton (2008). Recommendations for steel fiber concrete, e. V. Dr.-Ing. Udo Wiens Budapester Straße 3110787 Berlin, Germany. www.dafstb.de .
3. Hauck, C. J., et al. (2004). Macro-synthetic fiber-reinforced ShotCrete in a Norwegian tunnel. In Bernard (Ed), ShotCrete: More engineering developments. Cairns, Australia. ISBN:041535898.
4. Nikolaisen, E. (2010). Distribution of fibers in fresh fiber reinforced concrete (Norwegian title: Fordeling av fiber i fersk fiberarmert betong). The University of Life Sciences, 1432, Ås, Norway.
5. Norwegian Concrete Association (Norsk Betongforening). (2010). Dronning Mauds gate 15, Postboks 2312 Solli, 0201 Oslo, Norway. www.betong.net .
6. Norwegian Concrete Association Publication No. 7. (2011). Sprayed concrete for rock support. In Technical specifications, guidelines and test methods (NCA Publ. No. 7 2011).
7. Sørensen, C. (2012). Factors affecting fiber distribution in concrete and the efficiency of fibers on crack reduction. In IMT-report number 47/2012, The University of Life Sciences, 1432, Ås, Norway.
8. The Concrete Society. (2013). Surrey, England, www.concrete.org.uk .
9. The Concrete Producer Magazine. (2011). Do fibers affect concrete’s workability? www.theconcreteproducer.com .
10. Van Tittelboom, K., Snoeck, D., & Gruyaert, E. (2013). Self-healing ofconcrete. The Magnel Laboratory for Concrete Research, Department of Structural Engineering, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium. http://www.ugent.be/ea/structural-engineering/en/contact .
11. W. R. Grace Co., Grace Concrete Products (2011). In Synthetic fibers for concrete, Cambridge, MA.