Simplified Constitutive and Damage Plasticity Models for UHPFRC with Different Types of Fiber
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, several simplified constitutive models and a damage plasticity model for ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete(UHPFRC)material with micro and hooked ends steel fibers, Bekaert Dramix 5D steel fiber, and Forta-Ferro synthetic fiber had been developed. Later, these constitutive and damage plasticity models were applied as analytical model to numerically simulate the concrete members with different fibers, and to evaluate the behavior of the concrete sections. The constitutive models for UHPFRC of three mix designs were obtained experimentally by conducting uniaxial compression and tensile tests on both cylinder and dog-bone specimens. Next, a comparison was made among the three mix designs based on the outcomes retrieved from uniaxial compression and tensile stress–strain. These results were validated by numerically analyzing three hollow circular columns via finite element method. The numerical results revealed that the proposed material model possessed appropriate tensile strain-hardening behavior and uniaxial compression strengths of UHPFRC with different types of fiber. The lateral resistance responses of the tested hollow sections, which were obtained by using developed constitutive and damage plasticity models, displayed exceptional agreement with the experimental outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM. (2002). Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression; Annual Book of ASTM Standards (p. 469). West Conshohocken: ASTM.
2. Aydın, S., & Baradan, B. (2013). The effect of fiber properties on high performance alkali-activated slag/silica fume mortars. Compos Part B-Eng,45(1), 63–69.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.080 ↗
3. Bofang, Z. (2013). Thermal stresses and temperature control of mass concrete. Butterworth-Heinemann.10.1016/B978-0-12-407723-2.00017-8 ↗
4. El-Dieb, A. S. (2009). Mechanical, durability and microstructural characteristics of ultra-high-strength self-compacting concrete incorporating steel fibers. Mater Design,30(10), 4286–4292.10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.024 ↗
5. Farzad, M., Fancy, S. F., Azizinamini, A., Lau, K. (2019, May). Effect of concrete moisture on Macrocell development in repair of reinforced concrete substructure with UHPC. In: Corrosion 2019. NACE International.10.21838/uhpc.9682 ↗
6. Ferrara, L., Ozyurt, N., & Di Prisco, M. (2011). High mechanical performance of fibre reinforced cementitious composites: The role of “casting-flow induced” fibre orientation. Materials and Structures,44(1), 109–128.10.1617/s11527-010-9613-9 ↗
7. Grassl, P., Xenos, D., Nyström, U., Rempling, R., & Gylltoft, K. (2013). CDPM2: A damage-plasticity approach to modelling the failure of concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures,50(24), 3805–3816.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.008 ↗
8. Graybeal, B. A. (2006). Material property characterization of ultra-high performance concrete (No. FHWA-HRT-06-103).
9. Hassan, A. M. T., Jones, S. W., & Mahmud, G. H. (2012). Experimental test methods to determine the uniaxial tensile and compressive behaviour of ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). Construction and Building Materials,37, 874–882.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.030 ↗
10. Hillerborg, A. (1985). The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energy G F of concrete. Materials and Structures,18(4), 291–296.10.1007/BF02472919 ↗
11. Hognestad, E. (1951). Study of combined bending and axial load in reinforced concrete members. Engineering Experiment Station. Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, College of Engineering.
12. Kent, D.C., Park, R. (1971). Flexural members with confined concrete. J struct div.10.1061/JSDEAG.0002957 ↗
13. Kim, D., Naaman, A. E., El-Tawil, S. (2008). High tensile strength strain-hardening FRC composites with less than 2% fiber content. In: Proceedings of second international symposium on ultra high performance concrete, Kassel, Germany (pp. 169–176).
14. Lankard DR (1972) Prediction of the flexural strength properties of steel fibrous concrete. In: Proceedings, CERL Conference on Fibrous Concrete, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign (pp. 101–123).
15. Li, V. C. (2012). Tailoring ECC for special attributes: A review. Int J Concr Struct M,6(3), 135–144.10.1007/s40069-012-0018-8 ↗
16. Lu, X., & Hsu, C. T. T. (2006). Behavior of high strength concrete with and without steel fiber reinforcement in triaxial compression. Cement Concrete Research,36(9), 1679–1685.10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.021 ↗
17. Mahmud, G. H., Yang, Z., & Hassan, A. M. (2013). Experimental and numerical studies of size effects of ultra high performance steel fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) beams. Construction and Building Materials,48, 1027–1034.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.061 ↗
18. Naaman, A. E., Wille, K. (2012). The path to ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHP-FRC): five decades of progress. In: Proceedings of Hipermat, 3–15.
19. Ng TS, Htut TNS, Foster SJ (2016) Steel fibre reinforced concrete: From X-ray imaging observation to modelling. In: The second international conference on science, engineering and environment (pp. 407–414).
20. Richard, P., & Cheyrezy, M. (1995). Composition of reactive powder concretes. Cement and Concrete Research,25(7), 1501–1511.10.1016/0008-8846(95)00144-2 ↗
21. Rossi, P. (2008). Ultra high performance concretes. Concrete International,30(02), 31–34.
22. Rossi, P. (2013). Influence of fibre geometry and matrix maturity on the mechanical performance of ultra high-performance cement-based composites. Cement Concrete Comp,37, 246–248.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.005 ↗
23. Rossi, P., Arca, A., Parant, E., & Fakhri, P. (2005). Bending and compressive behaviours of a new cement composite. Cement and Concrete Research,35(1), 27–33.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.043 ↗
24. Wille, K., El-Tawil, S., & Naaman, A. E. (2014). Properties of strain hardening ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHP-FRC) under direct tensile loading. Cement Concrete Compound,48, 53–66.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.12.015 ↗
25. Wuest, J., EPF C. E., Brühwiler, E., ETH, D. C. E. (2008). Model for predicting the UHPFRC tensile hardening. In: Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC): Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete, Kassel, Germany, March 05-07, 2008 (No. 10, p. 153). Kassel University press GmbH.
26. Yang, S. L., Millard, S. G., Soutsos, M. N., Barnett, S. J., & Le, T. T. (2009). Influence of aggregate and curing regime on the mechanical properties of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). Construction and Building Materials,23(6), 2291–2298.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.012 ↗
27. Yoo, D. Y., Kang, S. T., Lee, J. H., & Yoon, Y. S. (2013a). Effect of shrinkage reducing admixture on tensile and flexural behaviors of UHPFRC considering fiber distribution characteristics. Cement and Concrete Research,54, 180–190.10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.09.006 ↗
28. Yoo, D. Y., Lee, J. H., & Yoon, Y. S. (2013b). Effect of fiber content on mechanical and fracture properties of ultra high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Composite Structures,106, 742–753.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.033 ↗
29. Yu, R., Spiesz, P., & Brouwers, H. J. H. (2015). Development of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC): Towards an efficient utilization of binders and fibres. Construction and Building Materials,79, 273–282.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.050 ↗
30. Yunsheng, Z., Wei, S., Sifeng, L., Chujie, J., & Jianzhong, L. (2008). Preparation of C200 green reactive powder concrete and its static–dynamic behaviors. Cement Concrete Comp,30(9), 831–838.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.06.008 ↗