journal article·2025-11-04

A novel approach to normalize the environmental impacts of textile products to support decision making

Qianwen Huang, Xin Li, Ying Zhang, Xiaofang Xu, Laili Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Purpose While various regional evaluation models are available for life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), there is often a lack of systematic and reliable normalization approaches. This issue is particularly relevant for the textile industry in China, known for its significant production and environmental burden. Design/methodology/approach Normalization, a crucial step in LCIA, is frequently affected by uncertainty and subjectivity. This study addresses these issues by proposing a per-capita baseline normalization method specifically for textile products in China. Using 2019 as the reference year, the study evaluates three endpoint impact categories: 7.61 × 10–2 DALY for human health, 1.57 × 10–4 species.yr for ecosystem impacts and 1.38 × 103 USD for resource availability. Findings These localized baselines reflect the unique aspects of textile production, allowing for precise calculations of environmental impacts, including pollutant emissions, energy consumption and resource use. The model was applied to a case study of silk apparel LCIA, revealing that resource availability had the highest impact score, followed by ecosystem and human health impacts. The sensitivity of the model to variations in normalization baselines highlights its precision. Originality/value This sector-specific approach improves localization and accuracy in environmental impact assessments, facilitating comparability among local textile products and supporting informed decision-making.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Sustainable Supply Chain Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Fashion Design and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University , ,

Hubei Provincial Fibre Inspection Bureau , ,

Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Digital Fashion and Data Governance, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University , Hangzhou,

State Key Laboratory of Bio-based Fiber Materials , ,

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Life cycle assessment in wastewater treatment: influence of site-oriented normalization factors, life cycle impact assessment methods, and weighting methods10.1039/C7RA01016H ↗
2. TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.010.1007/s10098-010-0338-9 ↗
3. Development of the method and U.S. normalization database for life cycle impact assessment and sustainability metrics10.1021/es052494b ↗
4. Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.007 ↗
5. CSYD (2017), available at: https://data.cnki.net/yearBook/single?id=N2017050140 (accessed 7 July 2024).
6. Representativeness of environmental impact assessment methods regarding life cycle inventories10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.102 ↗
7. Goedkoop · 2001
8. Assessing environmental impact of NOX and SO2 emissions in textiles production with chemical footprint10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154961 ↗
9. The mixing triangle: correlation and graphical decision support for LCA-based comparisons10.1162/108819899569584 ↗
10. ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y ↗
11. Enhancing pavement design selection by incorporating normalization into life cycle impact assessments10.1061/9780784479926.074 ↗
12. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) · 2006
13. An endpoint model for life cycle impact assessment in China and preliminary normalization values: a case study of vehicles10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140326 ↗
14. Is normalization in Life Cycle Assessment sustainable? Alternative approach based on natural constraints10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141234 ↗
15. A critical review and normalization of the life cycle assessment outcomes in the naval sector. Articles description10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133476 ↗
16. National Bureau of Statistics (2020a), available at: https://data.cnki.net/yearBook/single?id=N2021050066 (accessed 7 July 2024).
17. National Bureau of Statistics (2020b), available at: https://data.cnki.net/yearBook/single?id=N2021020054 (accessed 7 July 2024).
18. The requirement for congruence in normalization10.1007/BF02977843 ↗
19. The formulation of life cycle impact assessment framework for Malaysia using Eco-indicator10.1007/s11367-010-0219-9 ↗
20. Normalisation and weighting in life cycle assessment: quo vadis?10.1007/s11367-016-1199-1 ↗
21. On the feasibility and interest of applying territorial Life Cycle Assessment to determine subnational normalisation factors10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.126 ↗
22. A region-specific environmental analysis of technology implementation of hydrogen energy in Japan based on life cycle assessment10.1111/jiec.12973 ↗
23. Pollutant payback time and environmental impact of Chinese multi-crystalline photovoltaic production based on life cycle assessment10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.290 ↗
24. Methodology of life cycle impact assessment for Chinese products10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2001.02.022 ↗
25. Water footprint assessment of silk apparel in China10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121050 ↗