journal article·2026-04Open access

Modeling of Physical–Chemical and Thermomechanical Properties of Glasses From Recycled Waste

Roberto Ercoli, Paola Stabile, Gabriele Giuliani, Michael R. Carroll, Gianluca Bianchini, Eleonora Paris

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research focuses on understanding the high‐temperature phase evolution occurring during the vitrification of heterogeneous construction and demolition wastes (CDWs). The aim of this project is to transform this widely distributed and mostly unused waste stream into a homogeneous, engineered, glass‐based material with predictable properties, valuable for the glass industry. Starting with vitrification experiments, CDW samples (< 63 µm) were heated to target temperatures ( T ) of 1100°C, 1200°C and 1300°C and held isothermally for either 2 or 8 h. The experimental products were chemically characterized by electron microprobe (EMP) analysis, and the results show that the SiO 2 ‐ and Al 2 O 3 ‐rich samples (RAS and PRO) achieved a high degree of vitrification at ∼1300°C, forming a homogeneous glassy matrix. Conversely, the high CaO content in the TAL sample hindered complete vitrification by promoting the stability of calcium‐rich crystalline phases (e.g. larnite) up to temperatures as high as 1600°C, as shown by x‐ray diffraction patterns on the treated samples. Building on these findings, the GlassNet model was employed to design a blend of PRO sample with the addition of fly ash (FA.REI) and glass waste (VF3) to improve thermomechanical performance. The model predicted an optimized mixture (Exp.a), fully composed of waste materials, for acoustic and thermal insulation applications, thus demonstrating waste recycling potential for producing new high‐performance materials with practical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Glass properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Science and Technology Geology Division University of Camerino Camerino Italy

Department of Physics and Earth Sciences University of Ferrara Ferrara Italy

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Deloitte · 2017
2. 10.3390/app710109010.3390/app7101090 ↗
3. 10.31025/2611-4135/2021.1509710.31025/2611-4135/2021.15097 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.10.02810.1016/j.wasman.2021.10.028 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1607285510.3390/ma16072855 ↗
6. 10.3390/min1311137810.3390/min13111378 ↗
7. 10.1140/epjp/s13360‐025‐06677‐310.1140/epjp/s13360‐025‐06677‐3 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.03010.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.030 ↗
9. 10.14525/jjce.9.3.307110.14525/jjce.9.3.3071 ↗
10. 10.1080/17512549.2019.170258610.1080/17512549.2019.1702586 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11524310.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115243 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.02110.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.021 ↗
13. 10.5802/crgeos.11110.5802/crgeos.111 ↗
14. 10.1007/s13369‐024‐09292‐z10.1007/s13369‐024‐09292‐z ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.05210.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.052 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.wasman.2025.11514110.1016/j.wasman.2025.115141 ↗
17. Caurant D. · 2017 · 492
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.11660210.1016/j.actamat.2020.116602 ↗
19. A Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) From Earthquake Rubble to Recycling in Clinker Production: A Chemical‐Mineralogical Study Towards Circular Economy and Sustainability
20. Putz H. · 2019
21. 10.1515/9783110417104-00310.1515/9783110417104-003 ↗
22. 10.3390/su1205205510.3390/su12052055 ↗
23. Manning D. A. C. · 1995 · 141
24. 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.09.00510.1016/j.wasman.2004.09.005 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13384910.1016/j.matlet.2023.133849 ↗
26. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818542-1.00054-010.1016/B978-0-12-818542-1.00054-0 ↗
27. 10.3390/min1106065210.3390/min11060652 ↗
28. K.Schollbach Q.Alam V.Caprai et al. “Combined Characterization of the MSWI Bottom Ash ” inProceedings of the Thirty‐Eighth International Conference On Cement Microscopy(International Cement Microscopy Association 2016).
29. 10.1134/S106377451102020910.1134/S1063774511020209 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.02610.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.026 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.saa.2018.01.01810.1016/j.saa.2018.01.018 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.11810.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.118 ↗
33. 10.3390/cryst1104039310.3390/cryst11040393 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.07110.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.071 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.04.00910.1016/j.wasman.2014.04.009 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.13062110.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130621 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12241710.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122417 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12822010.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128220 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.wasman.2025.02.03310.1016/j.wasman.2025.02.033 ↗
40. Villanueva K. A. · 2011
41. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.02.35010.1016/j.ceramint.2024.02.350 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2025.12347610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2025.123476 ↗
43. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01945.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01945.x ↗
44. Buschow K. H. J. · 2001