Impact testing of screen protectors for mobile devices
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The mechanical damage resistance of phone components, particularly screens, is crucial for ensuring the longevity and functionality of modern smartphones. This study investigates the impact resistance of screen protector materials consisting of chemically strengthened glass and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) using a developed punch drop test method. The screen protectors were applied to ultra‐thin glass (UTG) samples, serving as surrogates for phone screens. The impact resistance was assessed by measuring the average fracture drop height of UTG breakage beneath a screen protector for various punch tip diameters. This outcome was summarized in a parameter termed “protectability”. The results indicate that glass screen protectors exhibit superior protection against sharp impacts due to their high stiffness, while the plastic screen protectors provide comparable protection against blunt impacts. Finite element simulations of glass and TPU screen protectors corroborate the experimental findings, highlighting the importance of material stiffness and thickness in enhancing protectability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Bioscience Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark
PanzerGlass A/S Hinnerup Denmark
Department of Engineering Mechanics Southeast University Nanjing China
Funding
Innovationsfonden
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-319-93728-1_4510.1007/978-3-319-93728-1_45 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-3-319-98392-910.1007/978-3-319-98392-9 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20210902910.1002/adma.202109029 ↗
4. PereiraS JocelynE LerouxP.Scratch resistance of cell phone screen protectors.2019. [Online]. Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335724333
5. 10.3390/mi1307103210.3390/mi13071032 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat311510.1038/nmat3115 ↗
7. 10.1080/02533839.2011.56561010.1080/02533839.2011.565610 ↗
8. Ashby MF · 2017
9. 10.1111/jace.1874110.1111/jace.18741 ↗
10. VepakommaKHandGlaesemannGS.Ball impact testing of glass: regarding assessment of glass strength. Corning Inc.2021. Accessed: May 23 2025. [Online]. Available:https://www.corning.com/worldwide/en/products/display‐glass/resources/technical‐papers.html
11. International Electrotechnical Commission.Liquid crystal display devices—Part 40–3: Mechanical testing of display cover glass for mobile devices—Biaxial flexural energy to failure (ball drop).Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission;2015.
12. International Electrotechnical Commission.Durability test methods for electronic displays—Part 3–5: Mechanical tests—Surface durability.Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission;2020.
13. 10.1007/978-3-319-93728-1_810.1007/978-3-319-93728-1_8 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.finmec.2021.10004710.1016/j.finmec.2021.100047 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1518384310.3390/polym15183843 ↗
16. 10.1155/2019/583836110.1155/2019/5838361 ↗
17. 10.1063/5.009685510.1063/5.0096855 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nocx.2018.10000710.1016/j.nocx.2018.100007 ↗
19. 10.1002/9781118433010.ch810.1002/9781118433010.ch8 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0301‐679X(98)00014‐010.1016/S0301‐679X(98)00014‐0 ↗
21. 10.1007/s40870‐016‐0052‐810.1007/s40870‐016‐0052‐8 ↗
22. 10.1557/jmr.2010.028710.1557/jmr.2010.0287 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.12211110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.122111 ↗
24. 10.1063/5.001355510.1063/5.0013555 ↗
25. 10.1007/978-3-319-93728-1_710.1007/978-3-319-93728-1_7 ↗
26. 10.1111/jace.1229810.1111/jace.12298 ↗
27. 10.1007/s40940‐016‐0019‐010.1007/s40940‐016‐0019‐0 ↗