Evaluation method of dynamic indentation behavior of glass based on electromagnetic induction phenomena
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Contact damage of glass is one of the most crucial issues for glass products. To develop strong and tough glass products and to compare damage resistance among glass compositions, a simple method for evaluating the mechanical response of glass during contact is required not only for glass mechanists but also for glass customers and suppliers. Although it is well known that the quasi‐static Vickers indentation test is one of the simplest and most useful methods to evaluate hardness and brittleness in glass, the indentation response of glass under the indenter at higher impact velocities remains to be quantitively understood because of the difficulty of measurement and limited experimental works. In this study, therefore, the dynamic indentation behavior of soda‐lime glass is evaluated by using a lab‐made free‐drop indentation set‐up with the coils for detecting electromotive forces (EMFs). The cono‐spherical indenter made of tungsten carbide attached with a neodymium magnet was employed to generate the EMFs when the indenter passed through the coils located near the glass sample. The impact load versus indentation depth curve during the impact within a few tens of microseconds was successfully obtained both for an elastic contact and for an inelastic contact. Under an elastic condition, where no residual indent nor any cracks were left on the glass surface after the test, it is confirmed that there is almost no hysteresis in the impact load versus indentation depth curve and that the curve can be reproduced by the Hertzian analytical solution. Under an inelastic condition, on the other hand, it is found that the hysteresis in the impact load versus indentation depth curve stems from inelastic phenomena, such as plastic deformation (shear flow and/or permanent densification) and cracking. These results suggest that the dynamic indentation technique based on electromagnetic induction phenomena is a useful and effective tool for evaluating the mechanical responses of glasses during the impact.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Laser Material Processing Techniques · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Integration Laboratories AGC Inc. Yokohama Japan
Innovative Technology Laboratories AGC Inc. Yokohama Japan
Department of Mechanical Engineering Toyohashi University of Technology Toyohashi Japan
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20210902910.1002/adma.202109029 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02649.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02649.x ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10083410.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100834 ↗
4. 10.1111/ijag.1654910.1111/ijag.16549 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.nocx.2018.10000710.1016/j.nocx.2018.100007 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.nocx.2019.10000910.1016/j.nocx.2019.100009 ↗
7. 10.2109/jcersj2.2010410.2109/jcersj2.20104 ↗
8. The diamond pyramid hardness of glass in relation to the strength and structure of glass
9. 10.1016/0022-3093(82)90176-410.1016/0022-3093(82)90176-4 ↗
10. Crack resistance of glass on Vickers indentation
11. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.07.01510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.07.015 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.03410.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.034 ↗
13. Driving force for indentation cracking in glass: composition, pressure and temperature dependence
14. 10.1016/0022-3093(70)90188-210.1016/0022-3093(70)90188-2 ↗
15. 10.1016/0022-3093(79)90154-610.1016/0022-3093(79)90154-6 ↗
16. 10.1557/jmr.2005.041810.1557/jmr.2005.0418 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.340755910.1063/1.3407559 ↗
18. 10.1007/BF0072484810.1007/BF00724848 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.35997310.1063/1.359973 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00364-610.1016/S0043-1648(99)00364-6 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.01.00210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.01.002 ↗
22. 10.3389/fmats.2017.0000410.3389/fmats.2017.00004 ↗
23. 10.3389/fmats.2017.0000510.3389/fmats.2017.00005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.04510.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.045 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.12031310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120313 ↗
26. 10.1080/14786435.2010.48558510.1080/14786435.2010.485585 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.07.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.07.002 ↗
28. Adachi T · 2019 · 1
29. 10.1007/s11340-021-00750-510.1007/s11340-021-00750-5 ↗
30. Development of impact micro‐indentation testing machine for evaluation of surface fracture
31. 10.1016/S0022-3093(99)00348-810.1016/S0022-3093(99)00348-8 ↗
32. 10.1007/978-3-319-07806-910.1007/978-3-319-07806-9 ↗
33. 10.1007/978-0-387-68188-710.1007/978-0-387-68188-7 ↗