Homogeneity of melt‐rocked Ge–Se glasses and the effect of impurities
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The impact of glass synthesis methods on the properties of Ge–Se glasses is investigated. The homogeneity of a GeSe 4 glass produced by mechanical convection in a rocking oven for 12 h at 950°C is characterized by Raman spectroscopy and Electron Microprobe analysis. It is found that the melt‐rocked glass is chemically and structurally homogeneous at all length scales investigated. In order to compare the effect of synthesis methods, another glass is produced following a static synthesis for 192 h. Their physical, structural, and dynamic properties are then characterized for comparative analysis. The molar volume and structure of both glasses are found to be identical when subjected to the same thermal history. The structural dynamics of GeSe 4 investigated by heat capacity spectroscopy is identical for the static and rocked glass and also compared with that of GeSe 9 and GeSe 3 . Overall, the two synthesis methods do not lead to any difference in measured properties. Finally, the effect of impurities is investigated in three glasses. The presence of water and oxygen impurities up to 30 ppm levels is shown to have no significant effect on physical and structural properties. Hence, the presence of water impurities cannot be attributed to mismatch in physical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Glass properties and applications · Material Dynamics and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA
Science and Technology Division Corning Incorporated Corning NY USA
Univ Rennes CNRS ISCR (Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes)‐UMR 6226 Rennes France
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.optmat.2015.06.03410.1016/j.optmat.2015.06.034 ↗
2. 10.1016/0022-3093(79)90033-410.1016/0022-3093(79)90033-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/0022-3093(83)90424-610.1016/0022-3093(83)90424-6 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.307716810.1063/1.3077168 ↗
5. Topological constraint theory of glass
6. 10.1111/j.2041-1294.2012.00093.x10.1111/j.2041-1294.2012.00093.x ↗
7. 10.1063/1.482646310.1063/1.4826463 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.2041-1294.2012.00092.x10.1111/j.2041-1294.2012.00092.x ↗
9. 10.1016/0022-3093(78)90141-210.1016/0022-3093(78)90141-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.01.04910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.01.049 ↗
11. 10.1016/0022-3093(83)90667-110.1016/0022-3093(83)90667-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/0022-3093(83)90429-510.1016/0022-3093(83)90429-5 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.505470410.1063/1.5054704 ↗
14. 10.3389/fmats.2019.0013310.3389/fmats.2019.00133 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp101414310.1021/jp1014143 ↗
16. Viscosity of oxygen‐free vitrified systems. II. Study of the viscosity of glasses in the selenium‐arsenic system
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.01420210.1103/PhysRevB.78.014202 ↗
18. A new moldable infrared glass for thermal imaging and low cost sensing
19. 10.1038/srep4054710.1038/srep40547 ↗
20. 10.3389/fmats.2017.0003210.3389/fmats.2017.00032 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.optmat.2009.07.02410.1016/j.optmat.2009.07.024 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.481148810.1063/1.4811488 ↗
23. 10.1021/jp202174x10.1021/jp202174x ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.267410.1103/PhysRevLett.54.2674 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.14410710.1103/PhysRevB.85.144107 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0054450110.1007/BF00544501 ↗
27. 10.1016/0022-3093(76)90059-410.1016/0022-3093(76)90059-4 ↗
28. Physicochemical analysis of Group IV element‐selenium binary liquid systems