Characterization of shear failure of refractory fireclay mortar joints using slant shear test at room temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Mortar joints are commonly used in industrial vessels to stabilize refractory linings. Quantification of their mechanical and thermomechanical behaviors is required for appropriate applications. In this study, slant shear tests of mortar joints using refractory–mortar–refractory sandwich structures were performed at room temperature, and the finite element method was used to explain the mechanisms that cause different types of cracking phenomena within the mortar joint. The impact of the testing configuration and surface roughness of the brick samples on load‐displacement curves and maximum loads was investigated. Maximum loads with small deviations were obtained using an improved preparation method and testing configuration. The cohesion and friction angle, which define the Mohr–Coulomb criterion at room temperature, are calculated and applied in the simulation. It was discovered that the competition between the brick‐mortar interface bonding strength and the mortar strength determined the cracking path, and their impact on the maximum load was slight.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire effects on concrete materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chair of Ceramics Montanuniversitaet Leoben Leoben Austria
LaMé Laboratory (EA 7494) Univ. Orléans, Univ. Tours, INSA CVL Orléans France
The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy Wuhan University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
Funding
China Scholarship Council
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1142/346110.1142/3461 ↗
2. Gupta OP · 2017
3. 10.1007/s11148-021-00529-010.1007/s11148-021-00529-0 ↗
4. Hashimoto K · 2023
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.11.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.11.021 ↗
6. 10.1080/1064119X.2013.82882110.1080/1064119X.2013.828821 ↗
7. Pluijmvan derR RuttenHS CeelenM.Shear behaviour of bed joints.12th International Brick/Block Masonry Conference.Madrid Spain.1993.
8. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.19110.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.191 ↗
9. MeliR.Behavior of masonry walls under lateral loads. Fifth world conference on earthquake engineering.Rome Italy.1973.
10. HamidAA.Behaviour characteristics of concrete masonry.PhD thesis.McMaster University Canada.1978.
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(56)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(56) ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.02010.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.020 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:9(2276)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:9(2276) ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000095810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000958 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11999710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119997 ↗
16. 10.4067/S0718-5073201400020000410.4067/S0718-50732014000200004 ↗
17. 10.1155/2014/24705810.1155/2014/247058 ↗
18. 10.1617/s11527-018-1215-y10.1617/s11527-018-1215-y ↗
19. 10.1016/j.sandf.2021.08.01110.1016/j.sandf.2021.08.011 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.oceram.2023.10036910.1016/j.oceram.2023.100369 ↗
21. 10.1002/nag.274510.1002/nag.2745 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10064-008-0124-710.1007/s10064-008-0124-7 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10374610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103746 ↗
24. Brulin J · 2011
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12056510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120565 ↗
26. ISO2021.ISO 13765 Refractory mortars.
27. Confinement effects on high‐strength concrete
28. Dahlem E · 2012
29. 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-210.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2 ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02842.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02842.x ↗
31. 10.1111/ijac.1488110.1111/ijac.14881 ↗