Advanced proof testing for structural ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Proof testing is used to remove weak ceramic components from a manufactured batch in turn truncating the lower end of the strength‐failure probability distribution. With proof testing, components are subjected to stresses comparable to those observed during service load histories resulting in the remaining ones having assured minimum reliabilities. The degree to which the reliability of the remaining parts is assured depends on the proof test protocol, which includes multiple variables such as stress level, realistic sampling of flaws, complex geometries, multiaxial stresses, transient loading histories, time‐dependent damage due to slow crack growth and/or fatigue, and change in material behavior due to temperature and/or environmental conditions. This paper advances the early work done on proof test theory, which was limited to simple stress states, to include general stress and material states. The theory introduced in this paper takes into account practical conditions often encountered in industrial applications. This advanced proof test theory was coded into the CARES/Life code (Ceramics Analysis and Reliability Evaluation of Structures/Life). Examples are provided to demonstrate the theory.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering University of North Florida Jacksonville Florida USA
NASA Cleveland Ohio USA
Connecticut Reserve Technologies, Inc. Cleveland Ohio USA
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. EvansAG WiederhornSM.Proof testing of ceramic materials – an analytical basis for failure prediction. Department of the Navy NSBIR 73‐147. March1973.10.6028/NBS.IR.73-147 ↗
2. RitterJE OatsPB.Proof testing of ceramics: I. Experiment. National Bureau of Standards NSBIR 79‐1934. December1979.
3. 10.1007/BF0055231710.1007/BF00552317 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0055231810.1007/BF00552318 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10501.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10501.x ↗
6. 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00091-410.1016/S0109-5641(01)00091-4 ↗
7. NemethNN JadaanOM GyekenyesiGP.Lifetime reliability prediction of ceramic structures under transient thermomechanical loads. NASA/TP 2005‐212505.2005.
8. Ceramics analysis and reliability evaluation of structures/life connecticut reserve technologies. Available fromhttp://www.ceramicreliability.com/software/cares.html
9. 10.1115/1.401033710.1115/1.4010337 ↗
10. BarnettRL.Fracture of brittle materials under transient mechanical and thermal loading. AFFDL−TR−66−220.1967.10.21236/AD0649978 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.342331010.1115/1.3423310 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1978.tb09327.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1978.tb09327.x ↗
13. 10.1007/978-1-4615-7014-1_1210.1007/978-1-4615-7014-1_12 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0003549910.1007/BF00035499 ↗
15. 10.1016/0025-5416(75)90009-910.1016/0025-5416(75)90009-9 ↗