Thermal shock resistance of silica gel‐modified magnesium carboxylate‐bonded high alumina castables
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Silica gel‐modified hydratable magnesium carboxylate (HMC) is used as the binder for refractory castables. The mechanical strength and thermal shock resistance of HMC bonded and silica gel‐modified HMC‐bonded castables were compared. When the HMC/silica gel mass ratio is 2, the cold modulus of rupture, the hot modulus of rupture, the residual strength ratio after three‐times water quenching tests, and the matrix‐specific fracture energy of the castables were increased by 300%, 124%, 44.7%, and 132%, respectively, compared with HMC‐bonded castables. The characterization of microstructure evolution of silica gel‐modified HMC‐bonded castables indicated that a small amount of liquid phase generated is conducive to improving the high‐temperature mechanical properties. The in situ alumina‐rich spinel and needle‐like mullite toughened the matrix and enhanced the thermal shock resistance of the castables by “microcrack generation” and “preventing crack propagation” mechanisms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials Science and Engineering Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology Xi'an China
Department of Architecture Engineering Sichuan Polytechnic University Deyang China
State Key Laboratory of Green Building Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology Xi'an China
College of Materials Science and Engineering Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology Luoyang China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.05.11710.1016/j.ceramint.2013.05.117 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.20410.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.204 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.02.04210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.02.042 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.01.02310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.01.023 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11148-020-00427-x10.1007/s11148-020-00427-x ↗
6. 10.1007/s11148-020-00447-710.1007/s11148-020-00447-7 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11148-020-00489-x10.1007/s11148-020-00489-x ↗
8. Colloidal alumina as a novel castable bonding system
9. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2006.01.00410.1016/j.ceramint.2006.01.004 ↗
10. 10.1111/jace.1401910.1111/jace.14019 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.30810.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.308 ↗
12. 10.1002/chin.19762301210.1002/chin.197623012 ↗
13. 10.1002/chin.19781703110.1002/chin.197817031 ↗
14. Microsilica‐gel bonded refractory castables with improved set‐behaviour and mechanical properties
15. 10.1016/j.pce.2017.02.00510.1016/j.pce.2017.02.005 ↗
16. 10.1590/S0366-6913200800010000710.1590/S0366-69132008000100007 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.05810.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.058 ↗
18. Hongp.Drying‐out behavior of cement‐free MgO based castables.International colloquium on refractories proceeding. Aachen;2021. p.76–80.
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.00110.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.001 ↗
20. 10.1111/jace.1936310.1111/jace.19363 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.12510.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.125 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb15848.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb15848.x ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.01610.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.016 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.00910.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.06610.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.066 ↗
26. 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00133-610.1016/0955-2219(95)00133-6 ↗
27. 10.1111/jace.1923210.1111/jace.19232 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10227510.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102275 ↗
29. 10.1179/09506600110152843910.1179/095066001101528439 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.02810.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.028 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2009.05.03110.1016/j.ceramint.2009.05.031 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.11010.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.110 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00115-810.1016/S0955-2219(03)00115-8 ↗
34. 10.1111/ijac.1421310.1111/ijac.14213 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb05338.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb05338.x ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.07.10110.1016/j.ceramint.2012.07.101 ↗
37. RacherRP McConnellRW BuhrA.Instructions for authors for the preparation of camera‐ready manuscripts for the proceedings of Copper 99–Cobre 99.43rd conference of metallurgists.2004. p.1–13.
38. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.17410.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.174 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.12810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.128 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.06910.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.069 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.11410.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.114 ↗