journal article·2024-05

Effects of particle size and content of cladding powder on in situ synthesized WC‐reinforced Ni‐based cladding layers

Cong‐xiao Zhang, Wan‐chang Sun, Er‐yong Liu, Yu‐wan Liu, Jing‐pei Liu, Bo Zhang, Meng‐ran Zhou, Yi‐fan Xu, Ya‐peng Jia

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Laser cladding technology can obtain a cladding layer with good metallurgical bonding with the substrate and excellent performance. In situ growth of hard phase can effectively solve the problem of uneven distribution of reinforcements directly doped with hard particles. In this paper, 45# steel was adopted as the matrix material, WO 3 , B 4 C, Al, and Ni60 powder were used to prepare laser cladding and in situ synthesized WC (Tungsten Carbide) hard phase reinforced Ni‐based cladding layers. The effects of different laser cladding parameters, powder particle size, hard phase content on the microstructures and electrochemical properties of in situ synthesized WC hard phase reinforced Ni‐based cladding layer were analyzed. The results revealed that when the (WO 3 + B 4 C + Al) mixed powder content was 25%, the bulk particles of WC phase in the cladding layer were most uniformly distributed in the cladding layer, which enhances the mechanical properties of the cladding layer. When the B 4 C particle size was 5 μm, the microhardness of the cladding layer was significantly higher than other cladding layers, and the enhancement mechanism of hardness by B 4 C is due to the Orowan strengthening caused by too small particle size of B 4 C.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Materials Science and Engineering Xi'an University of Science and Technology Xi'an P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.08210.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.082 ↗
2. 10.3390/coatings812045110.3390/coatings8120451 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12682910.1016/j.matlet.2019.126829 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12587610.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125876 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15498510.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154985 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00170-019-04893-710.1007/s00170-019-04893-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.13710.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.137 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.11410.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.114 ↗
9. 10.3390/app710106510.3390/app7101065 ↗
10. Effects of Nb and Mo on the microstructure and properties of 420 stainless steel processed by laser‐powder bed fusion
11. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.01.01710.1016/j.optlastec.2019.01.017 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00339-016-9905-110.1007/s00339-016-9905-1 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14621410.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146214 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.23510.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.235 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14422610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144226 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12734110.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127341 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11665-021-06167-410.1007/s11665-021-06167-4 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.09.01110.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.09.011 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.36410.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.364 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16614310.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166143 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.22610.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.226 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2005.09.00210.1016/j.ijrmhm.2005.09.002 ↗
23. 10.1108/0144515101107577110.1108/01445151011075771 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00024-310.1016/S0927-796X(00)00024-3 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.03610.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.036 ↗
26. DA S · 2017
27. Upadhyaya GS · 1998
28. 10.1007/s11665-013-0646-410.1007/s11665-013-0646-4 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00173-910.1016/S0921-5093(02)00173-9 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.06.04610.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.06.046 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.12.01710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.12.017 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.06210.1016/j.msea.2016.08.062 ↗