Utilization of copper slag in the fabrication of silica refractory: Characteristics and performance evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract It is urgently necessary for environmental resource utilization of copper slag with incremental quantities of stacked copper slag. In this paper, copper slag has been used as mineralizer and raw material to prepare silica refractory. The effect of copper slag on phase composition, microstructure, mechanical, and load deformation performance has been investigated. The results indicate that the components of copper slag as mineralizer promote the formation of tridymite. Simultaneously, copper slag promotes the densification of silica refractory and glass phase increases due to the mineralizer and impurities in copper slag. The increased glass phase promotes the cold crushing strength and cold modulus of rupture for silica refractory, while the hot modulus of rupture slightly decreases by 1.5 MPa for 6 wt% copper slag. In addition, the load softening temperature and high‐temperature creep attains 1632.6°C and ‐5.5%, respectively. It is estimated that the potential application of silica refractory with copper slag on upper part of copper stove (low‐temperature and low‐load region) is acceptable in consideration of environmental utilization of solid waste.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy Wuhan University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.11810.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.118 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00171-410.1016/S0921-3449(02)00171-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00164-210.1016/S0956-053X(02)00164-2 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.06.00810.1016/j.resconrec.2008.06.008 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mineng.2017.02.00610.1016/j.mineng.2017.02.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00171-410.1016/S0921-3449(02)00171-4 ↗
7. Wastes as resources: update on recovery of valuable metals from copper slags
8. 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.02.04610.1016/j.powtec.2019.02.046 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0304-386X(02)00138-X10.1016/S0304-386X(02)00138-X ↗
10. 10.1016/j.minpro.2015.08.00810.1016/j.minpro.2015.08.008 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.minpro.2013.05.00910.1016/j.minpro.2013.05.009 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.minpro.2013.07.00910.1016/j.minpro.2013.07.009 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12554110.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125541 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.26410.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.264 ↗
15. The research on using dispersant agent to iron recovery in copper slag
16. 10.1080/00084433.2016.118131310.1080/00084433.2016.1181313 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11837-017-2410-y10.1007/s11837-017-2410-y ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12284510.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122845 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.05610.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.056 ↗
20. Use of copper slag microparticles in self‐consolidating concrete
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11858010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118580 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.10985110.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109851 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.07010.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.070 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12465310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124653 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.07110.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.071 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.04510.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.045 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10351610.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103516 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10695010.1016/j.measurement.2019.106950 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11244-020-01346-410.1007/s11244-020-01346-4 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.scp.2022.10061410.1016/j.scp.2022.100614 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11286710.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112867 ↗
32. Research progress on resource utilization of copper slag
33. ISO10081‐1: Classification of dense shaped refractory products–Part 1: alumina‐silica products. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization;2005.
34. Effects of xonotlite additive and forming pressure on the properties of the SiO2‐based nanoporous thermal insulation materials
35. 10.1063/1.46119810.1063/1.461198 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15615810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156158 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.08.01510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.08.015 ↗
38. 10.1007/BF0020268110.1007/BF00202681 ↗