journal article·2024-11

Self‐defending mechanism of C/TaC‒SiC composites under 2100°C cyclic ablation environment

Mingde Tong, Xinhao Shi, Tao Feng, Ying Dai, Pengfei He

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract To achieve the repeatability of aerospace thermal components, C/TaC‒SiC composites were fabricated. Cycle ablation and bending tests were carried out. After 3 × 60 s of ablation beyond 2100°C, the mechanical property retention rate was 80.9%. Interestingly, a reaction similar to “ouroboros ring,” in which the cyclic reactions of “TaC being oxidized to Ta 2 O 5 and Ta 2 O 5 being reduced to TaC,” occurred in the central ablation region of C/TaC‒SiC composites. On the one hand, the continuous generation of TaC could prevent liquid state Ta 2 O 5 from being blown off central ablation region, playing a similar role in “water and soil conservation.” On the other hand, liquid Ta 2 O 5 covered the surface of C/TaC‒SiC composites during ablation process, contributing to block the inward permeation of oxidized gases. In addition, novel “Grotto” structures were detected in the transitional ablation region of C/TaC‒SiC composites. The formation reason of the “Grotto” structure has also been discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Clean and Efficient Turbomachinery Power Equipment School of Mechanics Civil Engineering & Architecture Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an China

School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics Tongji University Shanghai China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Science and Technology Major Project

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.10.01410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.10.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11101510.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111015 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11083110.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110831 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.corsci.2023.11122310.1016/j.corsci.2023.111223 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.corsci.2023.11107710.1016/j.corsci.2023.111077 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.11710.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.117 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.wear.2021.20410110.1016/j.wear.2021.204101 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ast.2016.02.00510.1016/j.ast.2016.02.005 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.06.04710.1016/j.actaastro.2020.06.047 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11049610.1016/j.corsci.2022.110496 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10882910.1016/j.corsci.2020.108829 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmat.2020.03.00110.1016/j.jmat.2020.03.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11076610.1016/j.corsci.2022.110766 ↗
14. 10.1111/ijac.1451910.1111/ijac.14519 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.03810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.038 ↗
16. 10.1111/ijac.1402010.1111/ijac.14020 ↗
17. 10.1111/ijac.1433910.1111/ijac.14339 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11070710.1016/j.corsci.2022.110707 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.08.00110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.08.001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.02.05910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.02.059 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.04310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.043 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.11.05410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.11.054 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.07.04710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.07.047 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11021510.1016/j.corsci.2022.110215 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.07.04510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.07.045 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11042610.1016/j.corsci.2022.110426 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.08.04510.1016/j.jmst.2022.08.045 ↗
28. 10.12442/j.issn.1002‐185X.2021050410.12442/j.issn.1002‐185X.20210504 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.09.00810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.09.008 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.02510.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.025 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12342810.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123428 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.01710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.017 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.31710.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.317 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.12.01510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.12.015 ↗
35. 10.15541/jim2023009110.15541/jim20230091 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.10.06310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.10.063 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.07.03610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.07.036 ↗
38. 10.3390/jcs612035910.3390/jcs6120359 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10697410.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106974 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.11330610.1016/j.matchar.2023.113306 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.04.02610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.04.026 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.06.00710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.06.007 ↗
43. 10.3390/ma1520718210.3390/ma15207182 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.06.00710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.06.007 ↗
45. National Standard Committee of China. GJB323A‐96: measurement standard of ablation properties of materials. 1996.
46. International Standard Test Methods for America.ASTM‐C1421‐01b: determination of fracture toughness of advanced ceramics at ambient temperature.2002.
47. 10.1111/jace.1627110.1111/jace.16271 ↗
48. Effect of oxide additions on the polymorphism of tantalum pentoxide. III. “Stabilization” of the low temperature structure type
49. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.03110.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.031 ↗
50. 10.6028/jres.072A.01810.6028/jres.072A.018 ↗