Effect of aggregate type on the mechanical properties and slag resistance of Al 2 O 3 ‐SiC‐C hot metal ladle bricks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Aggregates are important factors that determine the performance of refractory materials. To explore the influence of aggregate types on refractory material properties, Al 2 O 3 ‐SiC‐C bricks were prepared using bauxite, fused brown corundum, tabular corundum, fused white corundum, and microporous corundum with particle sizes of 5–3, 3–1, and ≤1 mm as aggregates, fused white corundum (≤.075 mm), SiC (≤.075 mm), or flake graphite (≤.15 mm) as the matrix, and a thermoset phenolic resin as the binder. Understanding the effects of the aggregate type on the mechanical properties and slag resistance of Al 2 O 3 ‐SiC‐C bricks provides a theoretical basis for the selection of different aggregates during production. The results showed that the Al 2 O 3 ‐SiC‐C brick had good high‐temperature mechanical properties and slag resistance when tabular corundum was used as an aggregate, owing to its high density and low content of cracks and impurity phases. When bauxite was used as an aggregate, its high‐temperature mechanical properties and slag resistance were poor, owing to its high porosity and impurity content.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy Wuhan University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
Wuhan Research Institute of Metallurgy Construction Co. Ltd of MCC Group Wuhan China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10538410.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105384 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11663-022-02437-110.1007/s11663-022-02437-1 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15803610.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158036 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.20110.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.201 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.10.02110.1016/j.msea.2008.10.021 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.05210.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.052 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0955-2219(97)00164-710.1016/S0955-2219(97)00164-7 ↗
8. 10.1111/ijac.1322310.1111/ijac.13223 ↗
9. 10.1080/21870764.2022.215534110.1080/21870764.2022.2155341 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.02210.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.022 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.16810.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.168 ↗
12. 10.1111/jace.1348710.1111/jace.13487 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.03310.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.033 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.21810.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.218 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.12.06710.1016/j.ceramint.2016.12.067 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.32610.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.326 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.16310.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.163 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.07.02210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.07.022 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.20610.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.206 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.1022910.1002/pc.10229 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.32710.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.327 ↗
22. 10.1111/ijac.1449610.1111/ijac.14496 ↗