journal article·2023-05Open access

Stress rupture of SiC/SiC composite tubes under high‐temperature steam

Takaaki Koyanagi, Omer Karakoc, Charles Hawkins, Edgar Lara‐Curzio, Christian Deck, Yutai Katoh

Abstract

Abstract SiC‐fiber–reinforced SiC matrix composite cladding for light water reactor fuel elements must withstand high‐temperature steam oxidation in a loss‐of‐coolant accident scenario (LOCA). Current composite designs include an outer monolithic SiC layer, in part, to increase steam oxidation resistance. However, it is not clear how such a structure would behave under high‐temperature steam in the case when the monolithic layer cracks and carbon interphases and SiC fibers are exposed to the environment. To fill this knowledge gap, stress‐rupture tests of prototypic SiC composite cladding at 1000°C under steam and inert environments were conducted. The applied stress was ∼120 MPa, which was beyond the initial cracking stress. The failure lifetime under steam was 400–1300 s, while 75% of the composite specimens did not fail after 3 h of total exposure under inert gases. Microstructural observations suggest that steam oxidation activated slow crack growth in the fibers, which led to failure of the composite. The results from this study suggest that stress rupture in steam environments could be a limiting factor of the cladding under reactor LOCA conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA

Nuclear Technologies and Materials Division General Atomics Electromagnetic Systems San Diego California USA

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.12.04310.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.12.043 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.00510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.005 ↗
3. 10.1111/jace.1309410.1111/jace.13094 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.00410.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.004 ↗
5. Overview of general atomics SiGAtm SiC–SiC composite development for accident tolerant fuel
6. 10.1111/jace.1796110.1111/jace.17961 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.07.00110.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.07.001 ↗
8. 10.1111/jace.1679910.1111/jace.16799 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.04.02910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.04.029 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.009 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.11.11710.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.11.117 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02810.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02810.x ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03266.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03266.x ↗
14. 10.1023/A:101852821277310.1023/A:1018528212773 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.280699610.1115/1.2806996 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00148-110.1016/S1359-835X(98)00148-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.013 ↗
18. 10.1111/jace.1683810.1111/jace.16838 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmps.2021.10460810.1016/j.jmps.2021.104608 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03180.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03180.x ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0035594610.1007/BF00355946 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.04.04710.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.04.047 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00041-X10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00041-X ↗
24. 10.1111/jace.1408610.1111/jace.14086 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.04610.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.046 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.12310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.123 ↗
27. 10.1111/jace.1576310.1111/jace.15763 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.dib.2020.10667610.1016/j.dib.2020.106676 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.15321710.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153217 ↗
30. 10.1016/0022-3115(78)90039-910.1016/0022-3115(78)90039-9 ↗