Effects of morphology on the electrochemical performance of NiFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles with battery‐type behavior
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We report the synthesis of NiFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles by the complexation EDTA‐citrate method under acidic (pH = 3) and basic (pH = 9) conditions. The structural, optical, vibrational, magnetic, and electrochemical properties were studied. The samples have crystallite sizes of 21 nm (pH 3) and 73 nm (pH 9), with rounded particles and layered structures. The 57 Fe Mössbauer spectra at 12 K showed that both samples had an inverse spinel cation distribution. At 5 K, the sample prepared at pH 9 showed saturation magnetizations of about 50 emu/g. Raman spectra showed typical bands of NiFe 2 O 4 phase. The materials were tested as electrodes under alkaline condition. The cyclic voltammetry and charge‐discharge experiments indicated a battery‐type behavior, with maximun capacities of 65 and 5 C/g (at specific currents of 3 and 10 A/g) for samples prepared at pH 9 and 3, respectively. This work offers a route for obtaining NiFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles with different morphologies and sizes tuned by the synthesis conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
UFRN Natal Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
Department of Physics Federal University of Paraíba João Pessoa Paraíba Brazil
UFPB João Pessoa Paraíba Brazil
Department of Theoretical and Experimental Physics UFRN Natal Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
Department of Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics UFERSA Mossoró Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jscs.2013.03.00310.1016/j.jscs.2013.03.003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.06610.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.066 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.04.11010.1016/j.matlet.2018.04.110 ↗
4. 10.1007/s40145-020-0396-310.1007/s40145-020-0396-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.00110.1016/j.energy.2016.11.001 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.489086310.1063/1.4890863 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11706-012-0167-310.1007/s11706-012-0167-3 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.18410810.1103/PhysRevB.63.184108 ↗
9. 10.18178/JOCET.2018.6.1.43510.18178/JOCET.2018.6.1.435 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apt.2019.11.01510.1016/j.apt.2019.11.015 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.06.03310.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.06.033 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10853-011-6115-210.1007/s10853-011-6115-2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.00310.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.01.04510.1016/j.rinp.2018.01.045 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.partic.2017.12.00110.1016/j.partic.2017.12.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.partic.2016.06.00310.1016/j.partic.2016.06.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12420710.1016/j.cej.2020.124207 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10853-006-0383-210.1007/s10853-006-0383-2 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.03.01710.1016/j.jmmm.2011.03.017 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10904-018-0813-z10.1007/s10904-018-0813-z ↗
21. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.07.04810.1016/j.molstruc.2014.07.048 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)00846-610.1016/S1359-6462(01)00846-6 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11664-018-6295-510.1007/s11664-018-6295-5 ↗
24. Microstructure investigation of a CoFe2O4/lauric acid/DDS‐Na/H2O ferrofluid
25. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.10.12410.1016/j.jmmm.2017.10.124 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.09.01210.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.09.012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.02.01610.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.02.016 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.10.10510.1016/j.ceramint.2016.10.105 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.05.01310.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.05.013 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.12.11810.1016/j.jallcom.2006.12.118 ↗
31. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-009210.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0092 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.08710.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.087 ↗
33. Synthesis of the perovskite‐type BaCe0.8Pr0.05Cu0.15O3‐δ via EDTA‐citrate
34. 10.3390/catal402007710.3390/catal4020077 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.09.03610.1016/j.cattod.2012.09.036 ↗
36. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.02.01510.1016/j.powtec.2011.02.015 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.10291610.1016/j.rinp.2019.102916 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.09.01010.1016/j.materresbull.2011.09.010 ↗
40. 10.1002/jrs.279110.1002/jrs.2791 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.00510.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.005 ↗
42. 10.1039/C2DT32687F10.1039/C2DT32687F ↗
43. 10.1887/075030578910.1887/0750305789 ↗
44. 10.1002/adma.20060007210.1002/adma.200600072 ↗
45. 10.1039/c3cs60166h10.1039/c3cs60166h ↗
46. 10.1039/c1ce05181d10.1039/c1ce05181d ↗
47. 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.12.00910.1016/j.elecom.2013.12.009 ↗
48. 10.1007/978-3-540-88428-610.1007/978-3-540-88428-6 ↗
49. 10.1007/978-94-009-5697-110.1007/978-94-009-5697-1 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRev.183.38310.1103/PhysRev.183.383 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRev.187.74710.1103/PhysRev.187.747 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.17443110.1103/PhysRevB.74.174431 ↗
53. 10.1093/oso/9780198517764.001.000110.1093/oso/9780198517764.001.0001 ↗
54. Cullity BD · 2009
55. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.07110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.071 ↗
56. 10.1039/C8RA07471B10.1039/C8RA07471B ↗
57. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0191410.1021/acsnano.8b01914 ↗
58. 10.1126/science.124962510.1126/science.1249625 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0005110.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00051 ↗
60. 10.1117/1.JPE.7.01200910.1117/1.JPE.7.012009 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.03210.1016/j.cej.2016.06.032 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.09210.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.092 ↗
63. 10.1039/C8RA02559B10.1039/C8RA02559B ↗
64. 10.1039/c4ta00492b10.1039/c4ta00492b ↗
65. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.22210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.222 ↗
66. 10.1002/aenm.20190200710.1002/aenm.201902007 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.04010.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.040 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12184710.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121847 ↗
69. 10.1002/cctc.20170037610.1002/cctc.201700376 ↗
70. 10.1039/C5RA20331G10.1039/C5RA20331G ↗
71. Journal of environmental chemical engineering a symmetric aqueous rechargeable battery based on NiFe2O4 derived from industrial efluents