Evaluation of oxidation resistance of MgO‐C bricks in oxy‐combustion and air‐combustion
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract There are important advantages in oxy‐fuel technology over conventional combustion, such as the reduction in fuel consumption and gaseous emissions. However, before its use in the steel industry, it is essential to know that the alteration of the firing system can lead to an increase in the wear of the oxide‐carbon refractories. In the present work, four types of MgO‐C bricks were fired under oxy‐fuel and air‐fuel conditions in a semi‐industrial furnace, simulating the heating of a steelmaking ladle. The fired bricks were evaluated in terms of weight loss, thickness of the decarburized layer, and phases and microstructure formed in this layer. The results indicated few differences in the properties of the bricks fired in the two systems. The brick with 12% carbon and Al antioxidant showed the highest oxidation resistance among all bricks investigated. The most important factor for the use of the oxy‐fuel system was the correct selection of the refractory microstructural properties, including the utilization of antioxidant additives.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Federal University of Rio Grande Sul ‐ DEMAT/UFRGS Porto Alegre RS Brazil
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Evaluation of the wear of refractories used in steel refining, Proceedings of 48 Annual Meeting of Braz
2. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.05610.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.056 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.16910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.169 ↗
4. Characterization and evaluation of the wear of magnesian refractory bricks employed in different regions of a steel making
5. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2005.03.00810.1016/j.ceramint.2005.03.008 ↗
6. 10.1179/09679780068083910.1179/096797800680839 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01391.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01391.x ↗
8. 10.1080/1042691080238197510.1080/10426910802381975 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11015-010-9335-910.1007/s11015-010-9335-9 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.05.02010.1016/j.ijggc.2011.05.020 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.01010.1016/j.energy.2014.10.010 ↗
12. 10.1111/jace.1438010.1111/jace.14380 ↗
13. Rashad A · 2013
14. Refractory corrosion behavior under air‐fuel and oxy‐fuel Environments
15. Investigations and measures to reduce emissions and energy consumption during the preheating of steel ladles
16. 10.1002/sca.2000910.1002/sca.20009 ↗
17. 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50021-510.1016/B978-008044704-9/50021-5 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.12310.1016/j.proci.2006.08.123 ↗
19. Lee WE · 2004
20. 10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00308-310.1016/S0955-2219(00)00308-3 ↗
21. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000045599.84988.9e10.1023/B:JMSC.0000045599.84988.9e ↗
22. Corrosion of refractories used in steel metallurgy. Part III: Characterization of commercial refractories
23. 10.1590/S0366-6913201400020001210.1590/S0366-69132014000200012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.08610.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.086 ↗